基于两个可穿戴传感器的实时观看距离和环境光照测量验证。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1111/opo.13457
Samrat Sarkar, Sieu K Khuu, Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz, Pauline Kang
{"title":"基于两个可穿戴传感器的实时观看距离和环境光照测量验证。","authors":"Samrat Sarkar, Sieu K Khuu, Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz, Pauline Kang","doi":"10.1111/opo.13457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To report the repeatability and accuracy of viewing distance and ambient illumination measured with the Vivior and Clouclip wearable sensors in a controlled laboratory setting and while young adults performed different near visual tasks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For Study 1, viewing distance and ambient illumination were measured repeatedly for 2 days with two sensors mounted on a mannequin. Results were compared with standard measures (ruler, lux meter) using linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis. In Study 2, viewing distances were captured in 13 young adults while they performed four near tasks for 20 min each (reading a printed article, reading an article on an iPad, typing on a laptop or watching videos on an iPad) under three illuminations (500, 250 and 25 lux). Results were compared between the devices and with a standard ruler and differences tested statistically using ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparison tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Study 1, a positive linear relationship was observed between viewing distances measured by each sensor and the standard ruler (mean [SD] difference of -0.12 cm [0.23] for Vivior, -0.18 cm [0.51] for Clouclip), with good repeatability (mean [SD] difference between 2 days was 0.02 cm [0.24] for Vivior, -0.14 cm [0.35] for Clouclip). A positive linear relationship was also observed between illumination measured by each sensor and the luxmeter (mean [SD] difference of -16.85 lux [325.5] for Vivior, 39.12 lux [335.6] for Clouclip). In Study 2, the viewing distances during the four near tasks were not significantly different between the three methods used. Shorter working distances were measured with all methods when reading a printed article compared to typing on a laptop and watching a video on the iPad (all p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vivior and Clouclip are recommended for real-time capture of near vision duration, distance and light exposure in future studies aiming to understand the effect of habitual visual environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19522,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","volume":" ","pages":"820-833"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of real-time viewing distance and ambient illumination measurement with two wearable sensors.\",\"authors\":\"Samrat Sarkar, Sieu K Khuu, Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz, Pauline Kang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/opo.13457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To report the repeatability and accuracy of viewing distance and ambient illumination measured with the Vivior and Clouclip wearable sensors in a controlled laboratory setting and while young adults performed different near visual tasks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For Study 1, viewing distance and ambient illumination were measured repeatedly for 2 days with two sensors mounted on a mannequin. Results were compared with standard measures (ruler, lux meter) using linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis. In Study 2, viewing distances were captured in 13 young adults while they performed four near tasks for 20 min each (reading a printed article, reading an article on an iPad, typing on a laptop or watching videos on an iPad) under three illuminations (500, 250 and 25 lux). Results were compared between the devices and with a standard ruler and differences tested statistically using ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparison tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Study 1, a positive linear relationship was observed between viewing distances measured by each sensor and the standard ruler (mean [SD] difference of -0.12 cm [0.23] for Vivior, -0.18 cm [0.51] for Clouclip), with good repeatability (mean [SD] difference between 2 days was 0.02 cm [0.24] for Vivior, -0.14 cm [0.35] for Clouclip). A positive linear relationship was also observed between illumination measured by each sensor and the luxmeter (mean [SD] difference of -16.85 lux [325.5] for Vivior, 39.12 lux [335.6] for Clouclip). In Study 2, the viewing distances during the four near tasks were not significantly different between the three methods used. Shorter working distances were measured with all methods when reading a printed article compared to typing on a laptop and watching a video on the iPad (all p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vivior and Clouclip are recommended for real-time capture of near vision duration, distance and light exposure in future studies aiming to understand the effect of habitual visual environment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"820-833\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13457\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13457","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:报告Vivior和Clouclip可穿戴传感器在受控实验室环境中测量的观看距离和环境光照的可重复性和准确性,同时年轻人执行不同的近视任务。方法:在研究1中,使用安装在人体模型上的两个传感器重复测量观看距离和环境光照2天。结果与标准测量(直尺、勒克斯计)采用线性回归和Bland-Altman分析进行比较。在研究2中,13名年轻人在三种照明(500、250和25勒克斯)下执行四项近距离任务,每次20分钟(阅读印刷文章、在iPad上阅读文章、在笔记本电脑上打字或在iPad上观看视频),同时记录了他们的观看距离。用标准尺比较两种设备之间的结果,并采用方差分析和Tukey多重比较检验对差异进行统计学检验。结果:在研究1中,每个传感器测量的观察距离与标准尺之间存在正线性关系(viviv的平均[SD]差为-0.12 cm [0.23], Clouclip的平均[SD]差为-0.18 cm[0.51]),具有良好的重复性(viviv的2天平均[SD]差为0.02 cm [0.24], Clouclip的-0.14 cm[0.35])。每个传感器测量的照度与luxmeter之间也观察到正线性关系(Vivior的平均[SD]差为-16.85 lux [325.5], Clouclip的平均[SD]差为39.12 lux[335.6])。在研究2中,四种近距离任务的观察距离在三种方法之间没有显著差异。与在笔记本电脑上打字和在iPad上观看视频相比,在阅读印刷文章时,使用所有方法测量的工作距离都更短(均p)结论:在未来旨在了解习惯性视觉环境影响的研究中,建议使用Vivior和Clouclip来实时捕获近视力持续时间、距离和光照。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of real-time viewing distance and ambient illumination measurement with two wearable sensors.

Purpose: To report the repeatability and accuracy of viewing distance and ambient illumination measured with the Vivior and Clouclip wearable sensors in a controlled laboratory setting and while young adults performed different near visual tasks.

Methods: For Study 1, viewing distance and ambient illumination were measured repeatedly for 2 days with two sensors mounted on a mannequin. Results were compared with standard measures (ruler, lux meter) using linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis. In Study 2, viewing distances were captured in 13 young adults while they performed four near tasks for 20 min each (reading a printed article, reading an article on an iPad, typing on a laptop or watching videos on an iPad) under three illuminations (500, 250 and 25 lux). Results were compared between the devices and with a standard ruler and differences tested statistically using ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparison tests.

Results: In Study 1, a positive linear relationship was observed between viewing distances measured by each sensor and the standard ruler (mean [SD] difference of -0.12 cm [0.23] for Vivior, -0.18 cm [0.51] for Clouclip), with good repeatability (mean [SD] difference between 2 days was 0.02 cm [0.24] for Vivior, -0.14 cm [0.35] for Clouclip). A positive linear relationship was also observed between illumination measured by each sensor and the luxmeter (mean [SD] difference of -16.85 lux [325.5] for Vivior, 39.12 lux [335.6] for Clouclip). In Study 2, the viewing distances during the four near tasks were not significantly different between the three methods used. Shorter working distances were measured with all methods when reading a printed article compared to typing on a laptop and watching a video on the iPad (all p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Vivior and Clouclip are recommended for real-time capture of near vision duration, distance and light exposure in future studies aiming to understand the effect of habitual visual environment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.80%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, first published in 1925, is a leading international interdisciplinary journal that addresses basic and applied questions pertinent to contemporary research in vision science and optometry. OPO publishes original research papers, technical notes, reviews and letters and will interest researchers, educators and clinicians concerned with the development, use and restoration of vision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信