COVID-19大流行期间个人物品之间的社会距离。

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
F1000Research Pub Date : 2025-02-05 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.12688/f1000research.130662.3
Wen Guo, Ayumi Ikeda, Kaito Takashima, Yoshitaka Masuda, Kohei Ueda, Atsunori Ariga, Kyoshiro Sasaki, Yuki Yamada
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间个人物品之间的社会距离。","authors":"Wen Guo, Ayumi Ikeda, Kaito Takashima, Yoshitaka Masuda, Kohei Ueda, Atsunori Ariga, Kyoshiro Sasaki, Yuki Yamada","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.130662.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has led to instructions and suggestions from governments and experts to maintain social (physical) distance between people to prevent aerosol transmission of the virus, which is now becoming the norm. Thus, we examined whether the pandemic extended the distance between personal belongings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 68 university students and instructed them to place their belongings on a long table following another participant (i.e., confederate). We measured the physical distance between the two belongings (i.e., the participant's and the confederate's). We collected data between June 10, 2022 and January 23, 2023. Pre-pandemic data was from Ariga (2016). Analysis was completed with one-tailed <i>t</i>-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the pre-pandemic results, via one-tailed <i>t</i>-test, the distance between the two belongings during the pandemic was significantly longer. Our results supported the hypothesis that the psychological framework for processing people's belongings has dramatically changed during this pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This change may have been driven by social distancing practices or an increase in perceived vulnerability to disease. Our results provide new implications for future public spatial design, in other words, not only the distance between people, but also the distance between their belongings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12260,"journal":{"name":"F1000Research","volume":"12 ","pages":"199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11822249/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social distancing between personal belongings during the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Wen Guo, Ayumi Ikeda, Kaito Takashima, Yoshitaka Masuda, Kohei Ueda, Atsunori Ariga, Kyoshiro Sasaki, Yuki Yamada\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/f1000research.130662.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has led to instructions and suggestions from governments and experts to maintain social (physical) distance between people to prevent aerosol transmission of the virus, which is now becoming the norm. Thus, we examined whether the pandemic extended the distance between personal belongings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 68 university students and instructed them to place their belongings on a long table following another participant (i.e., confederate). We measured the physical distance between the two belongings (i.e., the participant's and the confederate's). We collected data between June 10, 2022 and January 23, 2023. Pre-pandemic data was from Ariga (2016). Analysis was completed with one-tailed <i>t</i>-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the pre-pandemic results, via one-tailed <i>t</i>-test, the distance between the two belongings during the pandemic was significantly longer. Our results supported the hypothesis that the psychological framework for processing people's belongings has dramatically changed during this pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This change may have been driven by social distancing practices or an increase in perceived vulnerability to disease. Our results provide new implications for future public spatial design, in other words, not only the distance between people, but also the distance between their belongings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"F1000Research\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"199\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11822249/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"F1000Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.130662.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.130662.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:COVID-19大流行导致政府和专家的指示和建议,保持人与人之间的社会(物理)距离,以防止病毒的气溶胶传播,这现在正在成为常态。因此,我们研究了大流行是否延长了个人物品之间的距离。方法:我们招募了68名大学生,并指示他们将自己的物品放在一张长桌子上,跟着另一个参与者(即同伙)。我们测量了两件物品之间的物理距离(即,参与者和同伙的)。我们收集了2022年6月10日至2023年1月23日之间的数据。大流行前的数据来自Ariga(2016年)。采用单尾t检验完成分析。结果:通过单尾t检验,与大流行前的结果相比,大流行期间两件物品之间的距离明显变长。我们的研究结果支持了这样的假设,即在这次大流行期间,处理人们物品的心理框架发生了巨大变化。结论:这一变化可能是由保持社会距离的做法或对疾病的易感性增加所驱动的。我们的研究结果为未来的公共空间设计提供了新的启示,换句话说,不仅是人与人之间的距离,还有他们的物品之间的距离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social distancing between personal belongings during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to instructions and suggestions from governments and experts to maintain social (physical) distance between people to prevent aerosol transmission of the virus, which is now becoming the norm. Thus, we examined whether the pandemic extended the distance between personal belongings.

Methods: We recruited 68 university students and instructed them to place their belongings on a long table following another participant (i.e., confederate). We measured the physical distance between the two belongings (i.e., the participant's and the confederate's). We collected data between June 10, 2022 and January 23, 2023. Pre-pandemic data was from Ariga (2016). Analysis was completed with one-tailed t-tests.

Results: Compared with the pre-pandemic results, via one-tailed t-test, the distance between the two belongings during the pandemic was significantly longer. Our results supported the hypothesis that the psychological framework for processing people's belongings has dramatically changed during this pandemic.

Conclusion: This change may have been driven by social distancing practices or an increase in perceived vulnerability to disease. Our results provide new implications for future public spatial design, in other words, not only the distance between people, but also the distance between their belongings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
F1000Research
F1000Research Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1646
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: F1000Research publishes articles and other research outputs reporting basic scientific, scholarly, translational and clinical research across the physical and life sciences, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities. F1000Research is a scholarly publication platform set up for the scientific, scholarly and medical research community; each article has at least one author who is a qualified researcher, scholar or clinician actively working in their speciality and who has made a key contribution to the article. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research is suitable irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we welcome confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies. F1000Research publishes different type of research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others. Reviews and Opinion articles providing a balanced and comprehensive overview of the latest discoveries in a particular field, or presenting a personal perspective on recent developments, are also welcome. See the full list of article types we accept for more information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信