利用三维射线追踪OCT数据研究角膜上皮对角膜能量的影响。

Achim Langenbucher, Nóra Szentmáry, Alan Cayless, Peter Hoffmann, Jascha Wendelstein
{"title":"利用三维射线追踪OCT数据研究角膜上皮对角膜能量的影响。","authors":"Achim Langenbucher, Nóra Szentmáry, Alan Cayless, Peter Hoffmann, Jascha Wendelstein","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2025.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To study the effects of corneal imaging and focusing using a raytracing simulation with 2 and 3 surface corneal models based on customized surface representations of corneal tomography data .</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Raytracing simulation using surface data for the epithelium (S1), stroma (S2) and endothelium (S3) extracted from MS-39 anterior segment tomographer CSV export files. Customized surface representations were derived using Gaussian Process Predictors, and rays traced through the cornea and a 3.5 mm aperture stop located 3.66 mm behind the corneal apex. 4 clinical examples were evaluated: A) after hyperopic LASIK, B) after myopic LASIK, C) keratoconus, and D) after PRK with postoperatively developed Salzmann nodules.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The raytracing based bundle focus and wavefront focus distances of the 2 surface (S1 and S3) and 3 surface cornea models (S1, S2 and S3) were comparable, whereas the paraxial focus derived from a 1 surface cornea (S1), 2 (S1 and S3) or 3 surface cornea (S1, S2 and S3) using floating best fit sphere representations for S1, S1 and S3 showed systematically lower / higher focal distance with B) / C) indicating an overestimation / underestimation of corneal power with paraxial calculations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The clinical examples in this study exhibited only minor differences between the mono- and dual layer cornea models. We recommend verification in a larger clinical study. Three surface corneal raytracing models could be of clinical relevance in intraocular lens calculations and LASIK ablation nomograms, offering potential improvements over paraxial calculations especially in cases with surface irregularities.</p>","PeriodicalId":101315,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the corneal epithelium on the corneal power using 3D raytracing with OCT data.\",\"authors\":\"Achim Langenbucher, Nóra Szentmáry, Alan Cayless, Peter Hoffmann, Jascha Wendelstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.zemedi.2025.01.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To study the effects of corneal imaging and focusing using a raytracing simulation with 2 and 3 surface corneal models based on customized surface representations of corneal tomography data .</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Raytracing simulation using surface data for the epithelium (S1), stroma (S2) and endothelium (S3) extracted from MS-39 anterior segment tomographer CSV export files. Customized surface representations were derived using Gaussian Process Predictors, and rays traced through the cornea and a 3.5 mm aperture stop located 3.66 mm behind the corneal apex. 4 clinical examples were evaluated: A) after hyperopic LASIK, B) after myopic LASIK, C) keratoconus, and D) after PRK with postoperatively developed Salzmann nodules.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The raytracing based bundle focus and wavefront focus distances of the 2 surface (S1 and S3) and 3 surface cornea models (S1, S2 and S3) were comparable, whereas the paraxial focus derived from a 1 surface cornea (S1), 2 (S1 and S3) or 3 surface cornea (S1, S2 and S3) using floating best fit sphere representations for S1, S1 and S3 showed systematically lower / higher focal distance with B) / C) indicating an overestimation / underestimation of corneal power with paraxial calculations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The clinical examples in this study exhibited only minor differences between the mono- and dual layer cornea models. We recommend verification in a larger clinical study. Three surface corneal raytracing models could be of clinical relevance in intraocular lens calculations and LASIK ablation nomograms, offering potential improvements over paraxial calculations especially in cases with surface irregularities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2025.01.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2025.01.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究基于自定义角膜断层数据表面表示的2面和3面角膜模型的光线追踪模拟对角膜成像和聚焦的影响。方法:利用MS-39前段断层成像仪CSV导出文件中提取的上皮(S1)、间质(S2)和内皮(S3)表面数据进行光线追踪模拟。使用高斯过程预测器(Gaussian Process Predictors)导出定制的表面表示,光线通过角膜追踪,位于角膜顶点后3.66 mm处的3.5 mm孔径光圈。对4例临床病例进行评价:A)远视LASIK术后,B)近视LASIK术后,C)圆锥角膜术后,D) PRK术后并发Salzmann结节。结果:基于射线束焦点和波前集中2表面的距离(S1和S3)和3表面角膜模型(S1, S2和S3)是类似的,而近轴集中来自1表面角膜(S1)、2 (S1和S3)或3表面角膜(S1, S2和S3)使用浮动最适合领域为S1表示,S1和S3显示系统低/高焦距与B / C)指示的高估或低估和近轴计算角膜权力。结论:本研究的临床实例显示单层和双层角膜模型之间只有微小的差异。我们建议在更大的临床研究中进行验证。三种角膜表面光线追踪模型在人工晶状体计算和LASIK消融图中具有临床意义,特别是在表面不规则的情况下,对近轴计算提供了潜在的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of the corneal epithelium on the corneal power using 3D raytracing with OCT data.

Purpose: To study the effects of corneal imaging and focusing using a raytracing simulation with 2 and 3 surface corneal models based on customized surface representations of corneal tomography data .

Methods: Raytracing simulation using surface data for the epithelium (S1), stroma (S2) and endothelium (S3) extracted from MS-39 anterior segment tomographer CSV export files. Customized surface representations were derived using Gaussian Process Predictors, and rays traced through the cornea and a 3.5 mm aperture stop located 3.66 mm behind the corneal apex. 4 clinical examples were evaluated: A) after hyperopic LASIK, B) after myopic LASIK, C) keratoconus, and D) after PRK with postoperatively developed Salzmann nodules.

Results: The raytracing based bundle focus and wavefront focus distances of the 2 surface (S1 and S3) and 3 surface cornea models (S1, S2 and S3) were comparable, whereas the paraxial focus derived from a 1 surface cornea (S1), 2 (S1 and S3) or 3 surface cornea (S1, S2 and S3) using floating best fit sphere representations for S1, S1 and S3 showed systematically lower / higher focal distance with B) / C) indicating an overestimation / underestimation of corneal power with paraxial calculations.

Conclusions: The clinical examples in this study exhibited only minor differences between the mono- and dual layer cornea models. We recommend verification in a larger clinical study. Three surface corneal raytracing models could be of clinical relevance in intraocular lens calculations and LASIK ablation nomograms, offering potential improvements over paraxial calculations especially in cases with surface irregularities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信