通过插入/删除的数字PCR定量造血嵌合:针对不同嵌合状态的个性化选择。

IF 2.4
Dai-Yang Li, Pei-Li Xiao, Ye-Mo Li, Lin An, Ning-Juan Wang, Zhi-Yang Yuan, Ke-Ming Du, Zheng Zhong-Zheng
{"title":"通过插入/删除的数字PCR定量造血嵌合:针对不同嵌合状态的个性化选择。","authors":"Dai-Yang Li, Pei-Li Xiao, Ye-Mo Li, Lin An, Ning-Juan Wang, Zhi-Yang Yuan, Ke-Ming Du, Zheng Zhong-Zheng","doi":"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical decision-making after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is partially based on hematopoietic chimerism analysis. Short tandem repeat (STR), the current gold standard for quantitative chimerism analysis, has limited sensitivity. Digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) offers precise quantification and high reproducibility with excellent sensitivity (usually ≤0.1%) across a wide measurement range. However, the reported dPCR-based chimerism detection methods were developed in non-Chinese cohorts and may not be directly applicable to the Chinese population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To improve sensitivity and accuracy, we first screened out 14 insertions/deletions (indel) loci with high individual recognition rates in Asian populations based on literature and NCBI data. Then, we established a dPCR detection system for routine chimerism assessment (\"dPCR-chimerism system\") in Chinese transplant recipients. We compared the concordance between STR and dPCR in patient samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The newly developed dPCR-chimerism system covers all 12 pairs of autosomes, achieves a sensitivity of 0.01%, and demonstrates excellent linearity from 0.016% to 50%. For dual-donor samples, there was a strong correlation between STR and dPCR-chimerism detection values ( R2 = 0.9974). The R2 of the dPCR results was higher than STR when the theoretical chimerism rate of the single recipient was ≤5%. Clinical validation in 44 HSCT patients showed strong overall concordance between STR and dPCR (mean difference: 0.68%), although discrepancies were noted in some cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our newly developed system demonstrates excellent repeatability and sensitivity, particularly in detecting. It is expected to show good applicability in Chinese transplant patients. Selecting between dPCR and STR testing based on individual chimerism status can facilitate sensitive and accurate analysis, enable timely therapeutic intervention, and support effective relapse monitoring in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":94115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","volume":" ","pages":"298-306"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital polymerase chain reaction quantification of hematopoietic chimerism by insertion/deletion: A personalized selection for different chimerism status.\",\"authors\":\"Dai-Yang Li, Pei-Li Xiao, Ye-Mo Li, Lin An, Ning-Juan Wang, Zhi-Yang Yuan, Ke-Ming Du, Zheng Zhong-Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical decision-making after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is partially based on hematopoietic chimerism analysis. Short tandem repeat (STR), the current gold standard for quantitative chimerism analysis, has limited sensitivity. Digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) offers precise quantification and high reproducibility with excellent sensitivity (usually ≤0.1%) across a wide measurement range. However, the reported dPCR-based chimerism detection methods were developed in non-Chinese cohorts and may not be directly applicable to the Chinese population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To improve sensitivity and accuracy, we first screened out 14 insertions/deletions (indel) loci with high individual recognition rates in Asian populations based on literature and NCBI data. Then, we established a dPCR detection system for routine chimerism assessment (\\\"dPCR-chimerism system\\\") in Chinese transplant recipients. We compared the concordance between STR and dPCR in patient samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The newly developed dPCR-chimerism system covers all 12 pairs of autosomes, achieves a sensitivity of 0.01%, and demonstrates excellent linearity from 0.016% to 50%. For dual-donor samples, there was a strong correlation between STR and dPCR-chimerism detection values ( R2 = 0.9974). The R2 of the dPCR results was higher than STR when the theoretical chimerism rate of the single recipient was ≤5%. Clinical validation in 44 HSCT patients showed strong overall concordance between STR and dPCR (mean difference: 0.68%), although discrepancies were noted in some cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our newly developed system demonstrates excellent repeatability and sensitivity, particularly in detecting. It is expected to show good applicability in Chinese transplant patients. Selecting between dPCR and STR testing based on individual chimerism status can facilitate sensitive and accurate analysis, enable timely therapeutic intervention, and support effective relapse monitoring in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"298-306\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001215\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:同种异体干细胞移植(HSCT)后的临床决策部分基于造血嵌合分析。短串联重复序列(STR)是目前定量嵌合分析的金标准,但其灵敏度有限。数字聚合酶链反应(dPCR)结合了精确的定量和高重现性,在广泛的测量范围内具有优异的灵敏度(通常≤0.1%)。然而,报道的基于dpcr的嵌合检测方法是在非中国人群中开发的,可能不适用于中国人群。方法:为了获得更高的灵敏度和准确性,我们首先基于文献和NCBI从亚洲人群中筛选出14个个体识别率较高的插入/缺失(indel)位点。然后,我们在中国移植人群中建立了用于常规嵌合评估的dPCR检测系统(“dPCR-chimerism system”)。我们比较了患者样本中STR和dPCR的一致性。结果:新建立的dpcr -嵌合体系覆盖率高(12对常染色体),灵敏度为0.01%,线性度为0.016% ~ 50%。对于双供体样本,STR与dPCR嵌合检测值有很强的相关性(R2 = 0.9974)。当单个受体的理论嵌合率≤5%时,dPCR结果的R2高于STR。44例HSCT患者的临床验证表明,STR与dPCR在大多数情况下密切相关(平均差异为0.68%),在某些情况下两者之间存在差异。结论:该系统具有较高的重复性和灵敏度,尤其适用于微嵌合和双供体样品的检测。期望在中国移植患者中显示出良好的适用性。根据每个个体嵌合状态选择dPCR/STR检测有助于在临床环境中进行敏感准确的分析,有效的早期治疗干预和复发监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digital polymerase chain reaction quantification of hematopoietic chimerism by insertion/deletion: A personalized selection for different chimerism status.

Background: Clinical decision-making after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is partially based on hematopoietic chimerism analysis. Short tandem repeat (STR), the current gold standard for quantitative chimerism analysis, has limited sensitivity. Digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) offers precise quantification and high reproducibility with excellent sensitivity (usually ≤0.1%) across a wide measurement range. However, the reported dPCR-based chimerism detection methods were developed in non-Chinese cohorts and may not be directly applicable to the Chinese population.

Methods: To improve sensitivity and accuracy, we first screened out 14 insertions/deletions (indel) loci with high individual recognition rates in Asian populations based on literature and NCBI data. Then, we established a dPCR detection system for routine chimerism assessment ("dPCR-chimerism system") in Chinese transplant recipients. We compared the concordance between STR and dPCR in patient samples.

Results: The newly developed dPCR-chimerism system covers all 12 pairs of autosomes, achieves a sensitivity of 0.01%, and demonstrates excellent linearity from 0.016% to 50%. For dual-donor samples, there was a strong correlation between STR and dPCR-chimerism detection values ( R2 = 0.9974). The R2 of the dPCR results was higher than STR when the theoretical chimerism rate of the single recipient was ≤5%. Clinical validation in 44 HSCT patients showed strong overall concordance between STR and dPCR (mean difference: 0.68%), although discrepancies were noted in some cases.

Conclusion: Our newly developed system demonstrates excellent repeatability and sensitivity, particularly in detecting. It is expected to show good applicability in Chinese transplant patients. Selecting between dPCR and STR testing based on individual chimerism status can facilitate sensitive and accurate analysis, enable timely therapeutic intervention, and support effective relapse monitoring in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信