Karin Kjellenberg, Björg Helgadottír, Örjan Ekblom, Gisela Nyberg
{"title":"13 岁时的体能和屏幕时间与 16 岁时的学习成绩有关。","authors":"Karin Kjellenberg, Björg Helgadottír, Örjan Ekblom, Gisela Nyberg","doi":"10.1111/apa.70024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Investigate the longitudinal relationship between physical activity, organised physical activity, fitness, screen time and academic performance among Swedish adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 1139 adolescents at age 13, included vigorous physical activity (accelerometry), fitness (submaximal ergometer test), screen time and organised physical activity participation (self-reported) and academic performance (math and Swedish grades at ages 13 and 16 from registry). Academic performance at age 16 was categorised as A-D (higher grades or pass) or E, F (fail or at-risk of failing). Multilevel logistic regression models were used to examine the relationships while adjusting for gender, parental education, parental country of birth and academic performance at age 13.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher fitness at age 13 was associated with increased odds of receiving A-D at age 16 (OR: 1.04 per mL, 99% CI 1.00, 1.07, p = 0.003). High screen time during weekdays was associated with reduced odds (OR: 0.40, 99% CI 0.20, 0.81, p = 0.001) compared to low screen time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Academic performance at the end of compulsory school (age 16) was related to fitness and screen time 3 years earlier. These findings create a paradigm for future randomised controlled trials to explore how influencing these factors might affect academic performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":55562,"journal":{"name":"Acta Paediatrica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fitness and Screen Time at Age 13 Relates to Academic Performance at Age 16.\",\"authors\":\"Karin Kjellenberg, Björg Helgadottír, Örjan Ekblom, Gisela Nyberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/apa.70024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Investigate the longitudinal relationship between physical activity, organised physical activity, fitness, screen time and academic performance among Swedish adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 1139 adolescents at age 13, included vigorous physical activity (accelerometry), fitness (submaximal ergometer test), screen time and organised physical activity participation (self-reported) and academic performance (math and Swedish grades at ages 13 and 16 from registry). Academic performance at age 16 was categorised as A-D (higher grades or pass) or E, F (fail or at-risk of failing). Multilevel logistic regression models were used to examine the relationships while adjusting for gender, parental education, parental country of birth and academic performance at age 13.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher fitness at age 13 was associated with increased odds of receiving A-D at age 16 (OR: 1.04 per mL, 99% CI 1.00, 1.07, p = 0.003). High screen time during weekdays was associated with reduced odds (OR: 0.40, 99% CI 0.20, 0.81, p = 0.001) compared to low screen time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Academic performance at the end of compulsory school (age 16) was related to fitness and screen time 3 years earlier. These findings create a paradigm for future randomised controlled trials to explore how influencing these factors might affect academic performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Paediatrica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Paediatrica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.70024\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Paediatrica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.70024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fitness and Screen Time at Age 13 Relates to Academic Performance at Age 16.
Aim: Investigate the longitudinal relationship between physical activity, organised physical activity, fitness, screen time and academic performance among Swedish adolescents.
Methods: Data from 1139 adolescents at age 13, included vigorous physical activity (accelerometry), fitness (submaximal ergometer test), screen time and organised physical activity participation (self-reported) and academic performance (math and Swedish grades at ages 13 and 16 from registry). Academic performance at age 16 was categorised as A-D (higher grades or pass) or E, F (fail or at-risk of failing). Multilevel logistic regression models were used to examine the relationships while adjusting for gender, parental education, parental country of birth and academic performance at age 13.
Results: Higher fitness at age 13 was associated with increased odds of receiving A-D at age 16 (OR: 1.04 per mL, 99% CI 1.00, 1.07, p = 0.003). High screen time during weekdays was associated with reduced odds (OR: 0.40, 99% CI 0.20, 0.81, p = 0.001) compared to low screen time.
Conclusion: Academic performance at the end of compulsory school (age 16) was related to fitness and screen time 3 years earlier. These findings create a paradigm for future randomised controlled trials to explore how influencing these factors might affect academic performance.
期刊介绍:
Acta Paediatrica is a peer-reviewed monthly journal at the forefront of international pediatric research. It covers both clinical and experimental research in all areas of pediatrics including:
neonatal medicine
developmental medicine
adolescent medicine
child health and environment
psychosomatic pediatrics
child health in developing countries