探索学生药剂师在学习检测电子健康记录中的药物相关问题时所面临的挑战:对教学设计的影响。

IF 3.8 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Russ H. Palmer, Daniel Chastain, Christopher M. Bland, Beth B. Phillips
{"title":"探索学生药剂师在学习检测电子健康记录中的药物相关问题时所面临的挑战:对教学设计的影响。","authors":"Russ H. Palmer,&nbsp;Daniel Chastain,&nbsp;Christopher M. Bland,&nbsp;Beth B. Phillips","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to explore the challenges pharmacy students face when learning to detect medication-related problems (MRPs) in electronic health records (EHRs) during simulated patient work-ups and offer implications for instructional design in pharmacy education.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A qualitative research design was employed to analyze responses from 120 third-year pharmacy students enrolled in a required course. The students completed open-ended surveys at the end of the semester, describing the difficulties they encountered while working on patient cases in a simulated EHR. Inductive thematic analysis was used to identify recurring themes related to the students’ challenges.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The analysis revealed 3 macro-categories of challenges: (1) Work-up Process, including rushing through tasks and overlooking information; (2) Interpreting Cues, such as failing to understand the relevance of data and information overload; and (3) Perceived Ambiguity, including difficulty defining MRPs and conflicting information in the EHR. Ten specific themes were discovered within these macro-categories, providing a comprehensive view of the challenges students confronted.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Learners experienced significant challenges in detecting MRPs. These challenges were primarily rooted in managing the work-up process, interpreting clinical cues, and handling ambiguous information. The findings suggest a need for more structured scaffolding, repeated case-based practice focused on key cues and new strategies for modeling how to address ambiguity in clinical settings. These modifications may enhance students’ clinical reasoning and problem-detection abilities, improving their preparedness for real-world pharmacy practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":"89 3","pages":"Article 101371"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Challenges Student Pharmacists Confront when Learning to Detect Medication-Related Problems in Electronic Health Records: Implications for Instructional Design\",\"authors\":\"Russ H. Palmer,&nbsp;Daniel Chastain,&nbsp;Christopher M. Bland,&nbsp;Beth B. Phillips\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to explore the challenges pharmacy students face when learning to detect medication-related problems (MRPs) in electronic health records (EHRs) during simulated patient work-ups and offer implications for instructional design in pharmacy education.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A qualitative research design was employed to analyze responses from 120 third-year pharmacy students enrolled in a required course. The students completed open-ended surveys at the end of the semester, describing the difficulties they encountered while working on patient cases in a simulated EHR. Inductive thematic analysis was used to identify recurring themes related to the students’ challenges.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The analysis revealed 3 macro-categories of challenges: (1) Work-up Process, including rushing through tasks and overlooking information; (2) Interpreting Cues, such as failing to understand the relevance of data and information overload; and (3) Perceived Ambiguity, including difficulty defining MRPs and conflicting information in the EHR. Ten specific themes were discovered within these macro-categories, providing a comprehensive view of the challenges students confronted.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Learners experienced significant challenges in detecting MRPs. These challenges were primarily rooted in managing the work-up process, interpreting clinical cues, and handling ambiguous information. The findings suggest a need for more structured scaffolding, repeated case-based practice focused on key cues and new strategies for modeling how to address ambiguity in clinical settings. These modifications may enhance students’ clinical reasoning and problem-detection abilities, improving their preparedness for real-world pharmacy practice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"volume\":\"89 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101371\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945925000166\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945925000166","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨药剂学学生在模拟病人检查时,在电子健康档案(EHRs)中发现药物相关问题(mrp)时所面临的挑战,并为药剂学教育的教学设计提供启示。方法:采用质性研究设计,分析120名选修药剂学必修课程的三年级学生的反应。学生们在学期结束时完成了开放式调查,描述了他们在模拟电子病历中处理病人病例时遇到的困难。归纳主题分析用于识别与学生挑战相关的反复出现的主题。结果:分析揭示了三个宏观挑战类别:(1)工作过程,包括匆忙完成任务和忽略信息;(2)对线索的解读,如不能理解数据的相关性和信息过载;(3)感知歧义,包括难以定义mrp和电子病历中相互冲突的信息。在这些宏观类别中,共发现了十个具体主题,为学生面临的挑战提供了一个全面的视角。结论:学习者在检测mrp方面遇到了重大挑战。这些挑战主要来源于对检查过程的管理、对临床线索的解释以及对模糊信息的处理。研究结果表明,需要更多的结构化脚手架,重复的基于病例的实践,重点放在关键线索上,以及如何解决临床环境中模棱两可的建模新策略。这些修改可以提高学生的临床推理和发现问题的能力,提高他们为现实世界的药学实践做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the Challenges Student Pharmacists Confront when Learning to Detect Medication-Related Problems in Electronic Health Records: Implications for Instructional Design

Objective

This study aimed to explore the challenges pharmacy students face when learning to detect medication-related problems (MRPs) in electronic health records (EHRs) during simulated patient work-ups and offer implications for instructional design in pharmacy education.

Methods

A qualitative research design was employed to analyze responses from 120 third-year pharmacy students enrolled in a required course. The students completed open-ended surveys at the end of the semester, describing the difficulties they encountered while working on patient cases in a simulated EHR. Inductive thematic analysis was used to identify recurring themes related to the students’ challenges.

Results

The analysis revealed 3 macro-categories of challenges: (1) Work-up Process, including rushing through tasks and overlooking information; (2) Interpreting Cues, such as failing to understand the relevance of data and information overload; and (3) Perceived Ambiguity, including difficulty defining MRPs and conflicting information in the EHR. Ten specific themes were discovered within these macro-categories, providing a comprehensive view of the challenges students confronted.

Conclusion

Learners experienced significant challenges in detecting MRPs. These challenges were primarily rooted in managing the work-up process, interpreting clinical cues, and handling ambiguous information. The findings suggest a need for more structured scaffolding, repeated case-based practice focused on key cues and new strategies for modeling how to address ambiguity in clinical settings. These modifications may enhance students’ clinical reasoning and problem-detection abilities, improving their preparedness for real-world pharmacy practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信