使用楼梯方法增加运动:一项系统的搜索和回顾,为老年人提供一种新的久坐行为干预。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Konstantina Katsoulis, Maria C Tan, Sean Horton, Samir K Sinha, Bill Kapralos, David Dunstan, Danielle R Bouchard, Jennifer L Copeland, Shilpa Dogra
{"title":"使用楼梯方法增加运动:一项系统的搜索和回顾,为老年人提供一种新的久坐行为干预。","authors":"Konstantina Katsoulis, Maria C Tan, Sean Horton, Samir K Sinha, Bill Kapralos, David Dunstan, Danielle R Bouchard, Jennifer L Copeland, Shilpa Dogra","doi":"10.24095/hpcdp.45.2.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Traditional approaches to supporting older adults in adopting and maintaining an active lifestyle have largely failed. The previously proposed \"Staircase Approach\" offers a new foundation for developing interventions and public health strategies; this approach includes Step 1 (changing sedentary behaviour) and Steps 2 to 4 (incorporating more physical activity of increasing levels of intensity). In this systematic search and review, we aimed to inform the co-creation of a novel Staircase Approach intervention for community-dwelling, inactive older adults, primarily focussed on Step 1.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was performed across six databases (MEDLINE, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, SPORTDiscus and Scopus).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After duplicates were removed, 3427 titles and abstracts were screened. Fourteen articles (including 17 intervention groups) were included after full-text review. Five were randomized controlled trials, three compared two interventions and six were single-arm studies. Sample sizes ranged from 9 to 176 participants, and included 617 older adults at baseline. Mean age of samples ranged from 64.3 (standard deviation [SD] 3.8) to 85.1 (SD 6.2) years, while the intervention length ranged from less than one day to 6 months. Sedentary time interventions are well accepted; most studies had completion rates above 80%. Based on findings from within-group comparisons, half of the studies showed a reduction in sedentary time (6/12 groups) and half showed an increase in physical activity (6/12 groups). Based on findings from between-group comparisons, 2 out of 5 intervention groups showed improvements in sitting time and physical activity outcomes compared to controls. Satisfaction and adherence to interventions were generally high.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sedentary time interventions for older adults show promise and point to several components that may be included in an intervention focussed on Step 1 of the Staircase Approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":51316,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada-Research Policy and Practice","volume":"45 2","pages":"63-75"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using the Staircase Approach to increase movement: a systematic search and review to inform a novel sedentary behaviour intervention for older adults.\",\"authors\":\"Konstantina Katsoulis, Maria C Tan, Sean Horton, Samir K Sinha, Bill Kapralos, David Dunstan, Danielle R Bouchard, Jennifer L Copeland, Shilpa Dogra\",\"doi\":\"10.24095/hpcdp.45.2.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Traditional approaches to supporting older adults in adopting and maintaining an active lifestyle have largely failed. The previously proposed \\\"Staircase Approach\\\" offers a new foundation for developing interventions and public health strategies; this approach includes Step 1 (changing sedentary behaviour) and Steps 2 to 4 (incorporating more physical activity of increasing levels of intensity). In this systematic search and review, we aimed to inform the co-creation of a novel Staircase Approach intervention for community-dwelling, inactive older adults, primarily focussed on Step 1.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was performed across six databases (MEDLINE, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, SPORTDiscus and Scopus).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After duplicates were removed, 3427 titles and abstracts were screened. Fourteen articles (including 17 intervention groups) were included after full-text review. Five were randomized controlled trials, three compared two interventions and six were single-arm studies. Sample sizes ranged from 9 to 176 participants, and included 617 older adults at baseline. Mean age of samples ranged from 64.3 (standard deviation [SD] 3.8) to 85.1 (SD 6.2) years, while the intervention length ranged from less than one day to 6 months. Sedentary time interventions are well accepted; most studies had completion rates above 80%. Based on findings from within-group comparisons, half of the studies showed a reduction in sedentary time (6/12 groups) and half showed an increase in physical activity (6/12 groups). Based on findings from between-group comparisons, 2 out of 5 intervention groups showed improvements in sitting time and physical activity outcomes compared to controls. Satisfaction and adherence to interventions were generally high.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sedentary time interventions for older adults show promise and point to several components that may be included in an intervention focussed on Step 1 of the Staircase Approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada-Research Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"45 2\",\"pages\":\"63-75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada-Research Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24095/hpcdp.45.2.01\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada-Research Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24095/hpcdp.45.2.01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统的支持老年人采用和保持积极生活方式的方法在很大程度上失败了。先前提出的“阶梯方法”为制定干预措施和公共卫生战略提供了新的基础;这个方法包括步骤1(改变久坐的行为)和步骤2到步骤4(增加体力活动的强度)。在这个系统的搜索和回顾中,我们旨在为社区居住的、不活动的老年人提供一种新颖的楼梯方法干预,主要集中在第1步。方法:系统检索6个数据库(MEDLINE, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, SPORTDiscus和Scopus)。结果:剔除重复后,共筛选到3427篇标题和摘要。全文审查后纳入14篇文章(包括17个干预组)。其中5项为随机对照试验,3项比较两种干预措施,6项为单组研究。样本量从9到176名参与者不等,其中包括617名老年人。样本的平均年龄为64.3岁(标准差[SD] 3.8)至85.1岁(SD 6.2),干预时间从不足1天到6个月不等。久坐时间干预已被广泛接受;大多数研究的完成率都在80%以上。根据组内比较的结果,一半的研究显示久坐时间减少(6/12组),一半的研究显示体力活动增加(6/12组)。根据组间比较的结果,与对照组相比,5个干预组中有2个在静坐时间和身体活动结果方面有所改善。对干预措施的满意度和依从性普遍较高。结论:久坐时间对老年人的干预显示出希望,并指出了几个可能包括在楼梯方法第1步干预中的组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using the Staircase Approach to increase movement: a systematic search and review to inform a novel sedentary behaviour intervention for older adults.

Introduction: Traditional approaches to supporting older adults in adopting and maintaining an active lifestyle have largely failed. The previously proposed "Staircase Approach" offers a new foundation for developing interventions and public health strategies; this approach includes Step 1 (changing sedentary behaviour) and Steps 2 to 4 (incorporating more physical activity of increasing levels of intensity). In this systematic search and review, we aimed to inform the co-creation of a novel Staircase Approach intervention for community-dwelling, inactive older adults, primarily focussed on Step 1.

Methods: A systematic search was performed across six databases (MEDLINE, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, SPORTDiscus and Scopus).

Results: After duplicates were removed, 3427 titles and abstracts were screened. Fourteen articles (including 17 intervention groups) were included after full-text review. Five were randomized controlled trials, three compared two interventions and six were single-arm studies. Sample sizes ranged from 9 to 176 participants, and included 617 older adults at baseline. Mean age of samples ranged from 64.3 (standard deviation [SD] 3.8) to 85.1 (SD 6.2) years, while the intervention length ranged from less than one day to 6 months. Sedentary time interventions are well accepted; most studies had completion rates above 80%. Based on findings from within-group comparisons, half of the studies showed a reduction in sedentary time (6/12 groups) and half showed an increase in physical activity (6/12 groups). Based on findings from between-group comparisons, 2 out of 5 intervention groups showed improvements in sitting time and physical activity outcomes compared to controls. Satisfaction and adherence to interventions were generally high.

Conclusion: Sedentary time interventions for older adults show promise and point to several components that may be included in an intervention focussed on Step 1 of the Staircase Approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada: Research, Policy and Practice (the HPCDP Journal) is the monthly, online scientific journal of the Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention Branch of the Public Health Agency of Canada. The journal publishes articles on disease prevention, health promotion and health equity in the areas of chronic diseases, injuries and life course health. Content includes research from fields such as public/community health, epidemiology, biostatistics, the behavioural and social sciences, and health services or economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信