阿片类药物使用障碍治疗中丁丙诺啡家庭递送和保留的早期发现。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Marlene C Lira, Lauren E Hendy, Alisha Liakas, Laura Turanchik, Clare Pritchard, Cynthia Jimes, M Justin Coffey
{"title":"阿片类药物使用障碍治疗中丁丙诺啡家庭递送和保留的早期发现。","authors":"Marlene C Lira, Lauren E Hendy, Alisha Liakas, Laura Turanchik, Clare Pritchard, Cynthia Jimes, M Justin Coffey","doi":"10.1186/s13722-025-00545-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individuals with opioid use disorder face barriers accessing first-line pharmacotherapy. Home delivery interventions have been shown to improve medication adherence for other chronic diseases, but the relationship between buprenorphine home delivery and opioid use disorder treatment outcomes has not been assessed. We evaluated the association between medication home delivery and retention in treatment in a feasibility study of adults who initiated telemedicine treatment for opioid use disorder and received one or more prescriptions. We described the characteristics of patients and estimated the odds of attending a telemedicine visit three and six months after enrollment as a function of home delivery use using logistic regression. The sample consisted of 337 adults with the following characteristics: mean age 40.8 years (SD 10.1), 51.0% male, and 70.9% commercially insured. In the first 30 days of treatment 6.8% (n = 23) of patients used home delivery. At three months, the percentages of individuals retained among those with and without home delivery were 82.6% and 58.9%, respectively (odds ratio [OR]: 3.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10-9.96). At six months, the percentages of individuals retained among those with and without home delivery were 78.6% and 45.5%, respectively (OR: 4.39, 95% CI: 1.19-16.25, n = 203). Although uptake of medication delivery through the pharmacy partner was low within this sample of patients receiving treatment for opioid use disorder, its use was associated with increased retention in care at three and six months. Given the small sample size, low uptake, and limited statistical power, additional research is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":54223,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","volume":"20 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11816807/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early findings on home delivery of buprenorphine and retention in treatment for opioid use disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Marlene C Lira, Lauren E Hendy, Alisha Liakas, Laura Turanchik, Clare Pritchard, Cynthia Jimes, M Justin Coffey\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13722-025-00545-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Individuals with opioid use disorder face barriers accessing first-line pharmacotherapy. Home delivery interventions have been shown to improve medication adherence for other chronic diseases, but the relationship between buprenorphine home delivery and opioid use disorder treatment outcomes has not been assessed. We evaluated the association between medication home delivery and retention in treatment in a feasibility study of adults who initiated telemedicine treatment for opioid use disorder and received one or more prescriptions. We described the characteristics of patients and estimated the odds of attending a telemedicine visit three and six months after enrollment as a function of home delivery use using logistic regression. The sample consisted of 337 adults with the following characteristics: mean age 40.8 years (SD 10.1), 51.0% male, and 70.9% commercially insured. In the first 30 days of treatment 6.8% (n = 23) of patients used home delivery. At three months, the percentages of individuals retained among those with and without home delivery were 82.6% and 58.9%, respectively (odds ratio [OR]: 3.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10-9.96). At six months, the percentages of individuals retained among those with and without home delivery were 78.6% and 45.5%, respectively (OR: 4.39, 95% CI: 1.19-16.25, n = 203). Although uptake of medication delivery through the pharmacy partner was low within this sample of patients receiving treatment for opioid use disorder, its use was associated with increased retention in care at three and six months. Given the small sample size, low uptake, and limited statistical power, additional research is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11816807/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-025-00545-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-025-00545-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阿片类药物使用障碍患者获得一线药物治疗面临障碍。家庭分娩干预已被证明可以改善其他慢性疾病的药物依从性,但丁丙诺啡家庭分娩与阿片类药物使用障碍治疗结果之间的关系尚未得到评估。我们在一项可行性研究中评估了阿片类药物使用障碍成人远程医疗治疗和接受一个或多个处方的药物递送与治疗保留之间的关系。我们描述了患者的特征,并使用逻辑回归估计了在入组后3个月和6个月参加远程医疗访问的几率作为家庭分娩使用的函数。样本包括337名成年人,其特征如下:平均年龄40.8岁(SD 10.1), 51.0%为男性,70.9%为商业保险。在治疗的前30天,6.8% (n = 23)的患者使用了家庭分娩。3个月时,有和没有送上门的个体留存率分别为82.6%和58.9%(优势比[OR]: 3.31, 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.10-9.96)。在6个月时,有和没有送货上门的个体中保留的百分比分别为78.6%和45.5% (OR: 4.39, 95% CI: 1.19-16.25, n = 203)。虽然在接受阿片类药物使用障碍治疗的患者样本中,通过药房合作伙伴给药的吸收程度较低,但使用阿片类药物与3个月和6个月时护理留用率增加有关。考虑到样本量小,使用率低,统计能力有限,需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Early findings on home delivery of buprenorphine and retention in treatment for opioid use disorder.

Early findings on home delivery of buprenorphine and retention in treatment for opioid use disorder.

Individuals with opioid use disorder face barriers accessing first-line pharmacotherapy. Home delivery interventions have been shown to improve medication adherence for other chronic diseases, but the relationship between buprenorphine home delivery and opioid use disorder treatment outcomes has not been assessed. We evaluated the association between medication home delivery and retention in treatment in a feasibility study of adults who initiated telemedicine treatment for opioid use disorder and received one or more prescriptions. We described the characteristics of patients and estimated the odds of attending a telemedicine visit three and six months after enrollment as a function of home delivery use using logistic regression. The sample consisted of 337 adults with the following characteristics: mean age 40.8 years (SD 10.1), 51.0% male, and 70.9% commercially insured. In the first 30 days of treatment 6.8% (n = 23) of patients used home delivery. At three months, the percentages of individuals retained among those with and without home delivery were 82.6% and 58.9%, respectively (odds ratio [OR]: 3.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10-9.96). At six months, the percentages of individuals retained among those with and without home delivery were 78.6% and 45.5%, respectively (OR: 4.39, 95% CI: 1.19-16.25, n = 203). Although uptake of medication delivery through the pharmacy partner was low within this sample of patients receiving treatment for opioid use disorder, its use was associated with increased retention in care at three and six months. Given the small sample size, low uptake, and limited statistical power, additional research is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
64
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Addiction Science & Clinical Practice provides a forum for clinically relevant research and perspectives that contribute to improving the quality of care for people with unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, or other drug use and addictive behaviours across a spectrum of clinical settings. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice accepts articles of clinical relevance related to the prevention and treatment of unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use across the spectrum of clinical settings. Topics of interest address issues related to the following: the spectrum of unhealthy use of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs among the range of affected persons (e.g., not limited by age, race/ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation); the array of clinical prevention and treatment practices (from health messages, to identification and early intervention, to more extensive interventions including counseling and pharmacotherapy and other management strategies); and identification and management of medical, psychiatric, social, and other health consequences of substance use. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is particularly interested in articles that address how to improve the quality of care for people with unhealthy substance use and related conditions as described in the (US) Institute of Medicine report, Improving the Quality of Healthcare for Mental Health and Substance Use Conditions (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006). Such articles address the quality of care and of health services. Although the journal also welcomes submissions that address these conditions in addiction speciality-treatment settings, the journal is particularly interested in including articles that address unhealthy use outside these settings, including experience with novel models of care and outcomes, and outcomes of research-practice collaborations. Although Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is generally not an outlet for basic science research, we will accept basic science research manuscripts that have clearly described potential clinical relevance and are accessible to audiences outside a narrow laboratory research field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信