智力残疾者获得医疗保健:范围审查。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Maryann Barrington, Karen R Fisher, Ben Harris-Roxas, Catherine Spooner, Julian N Trollor, Janelle Weise
{"title":"智力残疾者获得医疗保健:范围审查。","authors":"Maryann Barrington, Karen R Fisher, Ben Harris-Roxas, Catherine Spooner, Julian N Trollor, Janelle Weise","doi":"10.1177/14034948251317243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>People with intellectual disability experience stark health inequalities, often because of poor access to mainstream healthcare. This scoping review aimed to identify factors that influence access to healthcare for people with intellectual disability using Levesque and colleagues' comprehensive framework of healthcare access.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This review followed Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. Articles were identified and retrieved from CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed and EMBASE. Two reviewers completed abstract and full-text screening, addressing any conflicts at each stage. Data was extracted and coded deductively, according to the supply (healthcare provider) and demand (healthcare seeker) dimensions of Levesque and colleagues' framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following search and screening, 66 references were included for review. Barriers to healthcare were more frequently identified in the literature compared to facilitators, with most information relating to supply-side dimensions. Barriers were related to inaccessible health information, low health literacy, stigma and discrimination by healthcare providers, and lack of organisational support, training and resourcing in both healthcare and support sectors. Facilitators often involved specialist workforces, strong interpersonal skills among healthcare providers, and advocacy from supporters. Importantly, findings indicated that both sociohistorical processes and support networks are necessary to understanding access experiences for people with intellectual disability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>\n <b>Greater efforts are required internationally to ensure the health rights of people with intellectual disability, to eliminate discrimination, and provide the support and resources necessary for all stakeholders to facilitate healthcare access. Models of healthcare access for people with intellectual disability should consider both the role of supporters and the sociohistorical context within which healthcare access occurs.</b>\n </p>","PeriodicalId":49568,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":"14034948251317243"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Access to healthcare for people with intellectual disability: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Maryann Barrington, Karen R Fisher, Ben Harris-Roxas, Catherine Spooner, Julian N Trollor, Janelle Weise\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14034948251317243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>People with intellectual disability experience stark health inequalities, often because of poor access to mainstream healthcare. This scoping review aimed to identify factors that influence access to healthcare for people with intellectual disability using Levesque and colleagues' comprehensive framework of healthcare access.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This review followed Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. Articles were identified and retrieved from CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed and EMBASE. Two reviewers completed abstract and full-text screening, addressing any conflicts at each stage. Data was extracted and coded deductively, according to the supply (healthcare provider) and demand (healthcare seeker) dimensions of Levesque and colleagues' framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following search and screening, 66 references were included for review. Barriers to healthcare were more frequently identified in the literature compared to facilitators, with most information relating to supply-side dimensions. Barriers were related to inaccessible health information, low health literacy, stigma and discrimination by healthcare providers, and lack of organisational support, training and resourcing in both healthcare and support sectors. Facilitators often involved specialist workforces, strong interpersonal skills among healthcare providers, and advocacy from supporters. Importantly, findings indicated that both sociohistorical processes and support networks are necessary to understanding access experiences for people with intellectual disability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>\\n <b>Greater efforts are required internationally to ensure the health rights of people with intellectual disability, to eliminate discrimination, and provide the support and resources necessary for all stakeholders to facilitate healthcare access. Models of healthcare access for people with intellectual disability should consider both the role of supporters and the sociohistorical context within which healthcare access occurs.</b>\\n </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"14034948251317243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948251317243\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948251317243","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:智力残疾者面临严重的健康不平等,往往是因为难以获得主流医疗保健。本综述旨在利用Levesque及其同事的医疗保健获取综合框架,确定影响智障人士获得医疗保健的因素。方法:本综述遵循乔安娜布里格斯研究所的指南。文章从CINAHL、PsycINFO、PubMed和EMBASE进行鉴定和检索。两名审稿人完成摘要和全文筛选,解决每个阶段的冲突。根据Levesque及其同事框架的供应(医疗保健提供者)和需求(医疗保健寻求者)维度提取数据并进行演绎编码。结果:经检索筛选,纳入文献66篇。与促进因素相比,文献中更频繁地确定了医疗保健方面的障碍,其中大多数信息与供应方面有关。障碍与无法获得卫生信息、卫生知识普及程度低、卫生保健提供者的羞辱和歧视以及卫生保健和支助部门缺乏组织支持、培训和资源有关。助理员通常涉及专业工作人员、医疗保健提供者之间强大的人际关系技能以及支持者的倡导。重要的是,研究结果表明,社会历史过程和支持网络对于理解智障人士的访问体验是必要的。结论:国际上需要做出更大的努力,以确保智障人士的健康权利,消除歧视,并为所有利益攸关方提供必要的支持和资源,以促进获得医疗保健服务。智力残疾者获得医疗保健服务的模式应考虑支持者的作用和医疗保健服务发生的社会历史背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Access to healthcare for people with intellectual disability: a scoping review.

Aims: People with intellectual disability experience stark health inequalities, often because of poor access to mainstream healthcare. This scoping review aimed to identify factors that influence access to healthcare for people with intellectual disability using Levesque and colleagues' comprehensive framework of healthcare access.

Method: This review followed Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. Articles were identified and retrieved from CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed and EMBASE. Two reviewers completed abstract and full-text screening, addressing any conflicts at each stage. Data was extracted and coded deductively, according to the supply (healthcare provider) and demand (healthcare seeker) dimensions of Levesque and colleagues' framework.

Results: Following search and screening, 66 references were included for review. Barriers to healthcare were more frequently identified in the literature compared to facilitators, with most information relating to supply-side dimensions. Barriers were related to inaccessible health information, low health literacy, stigma and discrimination by healthcare providers, and lack of organisational support, training and resourcing in both healthcare and support sectors. Facilitators often involved specialist workforces, strong interpersonal skills among healthcare providers, and advocacy from supporters. Importantly, findings indicated that both sociohistorical processes and support networks are necessary to understanding access experiences for people with intellectual disability.

Conclusions: Greater efforts are required internationally to ensure the health rights of people with intellectual disability, to eliminate discrimination, and provide the support and resources necessary for all stakeholders to facilitate healthcare access. Models of healthcare access for people with intellectual disability should consider both the role of supporters and the sociohistorical context within which healthcare access occurs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
135
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Public Health is an international peer-reviewed journal which has a vision to: publish public health research of good quality; contribute to the conceptual and methodological development of public health; contribute to global health issues; contribute to news and overviews of public health developments and health policy developments in the Nordic countries; reflect the multidisciplinarity of public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信