对不合时宜的制度的严重不满:韩国肿瘤医学学会申请抗癌药物超说明书使用的经验调查。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.4143/crt.2024.749
Jae Lyun Lee, Dong-Hoe Koo, Young-Woong Won, Young Saing Kim, Hee Kyung Ahn, Seungtaek Lim
{"title":"对不合时宜的制度的严重不满:韩国肿瘤医学学会申请抗癌药物超说明书使用的经验调查。","authors":"Jae Lyun Lee, Dong-Hoe Koo, Young-Woong Won, Young Saing Kim, Hee Kyung Ahn, Seungtaek Lim","doi":"10.4143/crt.2024.749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates the experiences and satisfaction levels of Korean medical oncologists with the prior authorization system for the off-label use of anti-cancer drugs. Conducted by the Korean Society of Medical Oncology (KSMO), the survey aimed to identify challenges and areas for improvement in the current regulatory framework.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional web-based survey was carried out between May 4 and May 14, 2023, targeting 261 active KSMO medical oncologists. Invitations were sent via email, and the survey, comprising 19 questions, was hosted on Microsoft Forms. The questions covered personal characteristics, work environment, experiences with the pre-application process, and post-approval experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the 261 invitations sent, 110 responses (42.1%) were received. Most respondents had over 10 years of experience and worked in tertiary hospitals. Although 93.6% were familiar with the pre-application system, 67.3% expressed moderate to high dissatisfaction. The key issues included complex applications, long approval period, stringent criteria, and inconsistent reviews. Additionally, 74.4% of respondents spent over 3 hours on first-time applications, with 68.3% experiencing rejections. Emotional responses to rejections were largely negative, with many feeling disregarded. Post-approval, patients of 96.8% of respondents faced financial burdens leading to treatment discontinuation. Most oncologists (86.0%) supported selective reimbursement if the disease was controlled for a certain period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The survey highlights significant dissatisfaction with the current system, suggesting the need for streamlining the application process, easing approval criteria, and reconsidering the financial aspects of post-approval treatments to support patient care and oncologists' decision-making autonomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49094,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"942-950"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12527614/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Significant Dissatisfaction with an Outdated System: A Survey on the Experience of Application for Off-Label Use of Anti-cancer Drugs by the Korean Society of Medical Oncology.\",\"authors\":\"Jae Lyun Lee, Dong-Hoe Koo, Young-Woong Won, Young Saing Kim, Hee Kyung Ahn, Seungtaek Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.4143/crt.2024.749\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates the experiences and satisfaction levels of Korean medical oncologists with the prior authorization system for the off-label use of anti-cancer drugs. Conducted by the Korean Society of Medical Oncology (KSMO), the survey aimed to identify challenges and areas for improvement in the current regulatory framework.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional web-based survey was carried out between May 4 and May 14, 2023, targeting 261 active KSMO medical oncologists. Invitations were sent via email, and the survey, comprising 19 questions, was hosted on Microsoft Forms. The questions covered personal characteristics, work environment, experiences with the pre-application process, and post-approval experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the 261 invitations sent, 110 responses (42.1%) were received. Most respondents had over 10 years of experience and worked in tertiary hospitals. Although 93.6% were familiar with the pre-application system, 67.3% expressed moderate to high dissatisfaction. The key issues included complex applications, long approval period, stringent criteria, and inconsistent reviews. Additionally, 74.4% of respondents spent over 3 hours on first-time applications, with 68.3% experiencing rejections. Emotional responses to rejections were largely negative, with many feeling disregarded. Post-approval, patients of 96.8% of respondents faced financial burdens leading to treatment discontinuation. Most oncologists (86.0%) supported selective reimbursement if the disease was controlled for a certain period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The survey highlights significant dissatisfaction with the current system, suggesting the need for streamlining the application process, easing approval criteria, and reconsidering the financial aspects of post-approval treatments to support patient care and oncologists' decision-making autonomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"942-950\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12527614/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2024.749\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2024.749","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究评估韩国肿瘤内科医师对超说明书使用抗癌药物的经验和满意度。该调查由韩国肿瘤医学学会(KSMO)进行,旨在确定当前监管框架面临的挑战和需要改进的领域。材料和方法:在2023年5月4日至5月14日期间进行了一项基于网络的横断面调查,目标是261名活跃的KSMO医学肿瘤学家。邀请是通过电子邮件发送的,调查包括19个问题,在微软表格上进行。这些问题包括个人特点、工作环境、申请前流程的经历和批准后的经历。结果:共发出261份邀请,收到回复110份(42.1%)。大多数受访者具有10年以上的工作经验,并在三级医院工作。虽然93.6%的人熟悉预申请系统,但67.3%的人表示中度至高度不满。关键问题包括复杂的申请、漫长的批准期、严格的标准和不一致的审查。此外,74.4%的受访者首次申请的时间超过3小时,其中68.3%的人被拒绝。对拒绝的情绪反应大多是消极的,许多人觉得自己被忽视了。批准后,96.8%的受访者患者面临经济负担导致治疗中断。大多数肿瘤学家(86.0%)支持在疾病控制一段时间后选择性报销。结论:调查突出了对现行制度的严重不满,建议需要简化申请流程,放宽审批标准,并重新考虑批准后治疗的财务方面,以支持患者护理和肿瘤学家的决策自主权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Significant Dissatisfaction with an Outdated System: A Survey on the Experience of Application for Off-Label Use of Anti-cancer Drugs by the Korean Society of Medical Oncology.

Significant Dissatisfaction with an Outdated System: A Survey on the Experience of Application for Off-Label Use of Anti-cancer Drugs by the Korean Society of Medical Oncology.

Significant Dissatisfaction with an Outdated System: A Survey on the Experience of Application for Off-Label Use of Anti-cancer Drugs by the Korean Society of Medical Oncology.

Significant Dissatisfaction with an Outdated System: A Survey on the Experience of Application for Off-Label Use of Anti-cancer Drugs by the Korean Society of Medical Oncology.

Purpose: This study evaluates the experiences and satisfaction levels of Korean medical oncologists with the prior authorization system for the off-label use of anti-cancer drugs. Conducted by the Korean Society of Medical Oncology (KSMO), the survey aimed to identify challenges and areas for improvement in the current regulatory framework.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional web-based survey was carried out between May 4 and May 14, 2023, targeting 261 active KSMO medical oncologists. Invitations were sent via email, and the survey, comprising 19 questions, was hosted on Microsoft Forms. The questions covered personal characteristics, work environment, experiences with the pre-application process, and post-approval experiences.

Results: For the 261 invitations sent, 110 responses (42.1%) were received. Most respondents had over 10 years of experience and worked in tertiary hospitals. Although 93.6% were familiar with the pre-application system, 67.3% expressed moderate to high dissatisfaction. The key issues included complex applications, long approval period, stringent criteria, and inconsistent reviews. Additionally, 74.4% of respondents spent over 3 hours on first-time applications, with 68.3% experiencing rejections. Emotional responses to rejections were largely negative, with many feeling disregarded. Post-approval, patients of 96.8% of respondents faced financial burdens leading to treatment discontinuation. Most oncologists (86.0%) supported selective reimbursement if the disease was controlled for a certain period.

Conclusion: The survey highlights significant dissatisfaction with the current system, suggesting the need for streamlining the application process, easing approval criteria, and reconsidering the financial aspects of post-approval treatments to support patient care and oncologists' decision-making autonomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
126
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Research and Treatment is a peer-reviewed open access publication of the Korean Cancer Association. It is published quarterly, one volume per year. Abbreviated title is Cancer Res Treat. It accepts manuscripts relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research. Subjects include carcinogenesis, tumor biology, molecular oncology, cancer genetics, tumor immunology, epidemiology, predictive markers and cancer prevention, pathology, cancer diagnosis, screening and therapies including chemotherapy, surgery, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, gene therapy, multimodality treatment and palliative care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信