术前血小板输注和免疫血小板减少患者出血风险分层的影响。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Ka-Won Kang, Yumin Choi, Hyung-Jun Lim, Kunye Kwak, Yoon Seok Choi, Yong Park, Byung Soo Kim, Kwang-Sig Lee, Ki Hoon Ahn
{"title":"术前血小板输注和免疫血小板减少患者出血风险分层的影响。","authors":"Ka-Won Kang, Yumin Choi, Hyung-Jun Lim, Kunye Kwak, Yoon Seok Choi, Yong Park, Byung Soo Kim, Kwang-Sig Lee, Ki Hoon Ahn","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-89419-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The main treatment goal for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is bleeding risk reduction, particularly during procedures. While adjusting platelet thresholds with ITP treatments is recommended, platelet transfusions are commonly used despite controversial benefits. We evaluated the effectiveness of platelet transfusion in reducing post-procedure bleeding risk and identified predictive indicators of bleeding. A nationally representative database was used to develop a model predicting post-procedure bleeding risk in patients with ITP. Machine learning analyses, including random forest feature importance and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values, assessed 34 risk factors, including the platelet transfusion amount. The random forest model had an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 93.6%. Key variables influencing bleeding risk included platelet transfusion amount, high-risk procedure, anticoagulant use, anemia, age, ITP treatment, and newly diagnosed ITP, all positively correlated with bleeding risk. Conversely, no antiplatelet or anticoagulant use and moderate- or low-risk procedures were negatively associated with bleeding risk. SHAP plots showed that platelet transfusion amount correlated with high-risk procedures, and bleeding risk increased with age in high-risk procedures. Bleeding risk in patients with ITP is primarily determined by procedural risk and patient condition, rather than platelet transfusion. Minimizing unnecessary platelet transfusions and addressing bleeding risk factors pre-procedure is crucial.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"5174"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11822007/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of platelet transfusion and bleeding risk stratification in patients with immune thrombocytopenia before procedures.\",\"authors\":\"Ka-Won Kang, Yumin Choi, Hyung-Jun Lim, Kunye Kwak, Yoon Seok Choi, Yong Park, Byung Soo Kim, Kwang-Sig Lee, Ki Hoon Ahn\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-89419-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The main treatment goal for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is bleeding risk reduction, particularly during procedures. While adjusting platelet thresholds with ITP treatments is recommended, platelet transfusions are commonly used despite controversial benefits. We evaluated the effectiveness of platelet transfusion in reducing post-procedure bleeding risk and identified predictive indicators of bleeding. A nationally representative database was used to develop a model predicting post-procedure bleeding risk in patients with ITP. Machine learning analyses, including random forest feature importance and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values, assessed 34 risk factors, including the platelet transfusion amount. The random forest model had an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 93.6%. Key variables influencing bleeding risk included platelet transfusion amount, high-risk procedure, anticoagulant use, anemia, age, ITP treatment, and newly diagnosed ITP, all positively correlated with bleeding risk. Conversely, no antiplatelet or anticoagulant use and moderate- or low-risk procedures were negatively associated with bleeding risk. SHAP plots showed that platelet transfusion amount correlated with high-risk procedures, and bleeding risk increased with age in high-risk procedures. Bleeding risk in patients with ITP is primarily determined by procedural risk and patient condition, rather than platelet transfusion. Minimizing unnecessary platelet transfusions and addressing bleeding risk factors pre-procedure is crucial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"5174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11822007/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-89419-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-89419-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)的主要治疗目标是降低出血风险,特别是在手术过程中。虽然建议通过ITP治疗来调整血小板阈值,但尽管存在争议,但血小板输注仍被广泛使用。我们评估了血小板输注在降低术后出血风险方面的有效性,并确定了出血的预测指标。一个具有全国代表性的数据库被用于开发预测ITP患者术后出血风险的模型。机器学习分析,包括随机森林特征重要性和Shapley加性解释(SHAP)值,评估了34个危险因素,包括血小板输注量。随机森林模型在接受者-工作特征曲线下的面积为93.6%。影响出血风险的关键变量包括血小板输注量、高危手术、抗凝剂使用、贫血、年龄、ITP治疗、新诊断ITP,均与出血风险呈正相关。相反,不使用抗血小板或抗凝血剂和中等或低风险手术与出血风险负相关。SHAP图显示血小板输注量与高危手术相关,高危手术出血风险随年龄增加而增加。ITP患者的出血风险主要取决于手术风险和患者病情,而不是血小板输注。减少不必要的血小板输注和处理手术前出血风险因素是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impact of platelet transfusion and bleeding risk stratification in patients with immune thrombocytopenia before procedures.

Impact of platelet transfusion and bleeding risk stratification in patients with immune thrombocytopenia before procedures.

Impact of platelet transfusion and bleeding risk stratification in patients with immune thrombocytopenia before procedures.

Impact of platelet transfusion and bleeding risk stratification in patients with immune thrombocytopenia before procedures.

The main treatment goal for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is bleeding risk reduction, particularly during procedures. While adjusting platelet thresholds with ITP treatments is recommended, platelet transfusions are commonly used despite controversial benefits. We evaluated the effectiveness of platelet transfusion in reducing post-procedure bleeding risk and identified predictive indicators of bleeding. A nationally representative database was used to develop a model predicting post-procedure bleeding risk in patients with ITP. Machine learning analyses, including random forest feature importance and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values, assessed 34 risk factors, including the platelet transfusion amount. The random forest model had an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 93.6%. Key variables influencing bleeding risk included platelet transfusion amount, high-risk procedure, anticoagulant use, anemia, age, ITP treatment, and newly diagnosed ITP, all positively correlated with bleeding risk. Conversely, no antiplatelet or anticoagulant use and moderate- or low-risk procedures were negatively associated with bleeding risk. SHAP plots showed that platelet transfusion amount correlated with high-risk procedures, and bleeding risk increased with age in high-risk procedures. Bleeding risk in patients with ITP is primarily determined by procedural risk and patient condition, rather than platelet transfusion. Minimizing unnecessary platelet transfusions and addressing bleeding risk factors pre-procedure is crucial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信