[一种改进的快速跟踪PACU出院评估工具在骨肿瘤学领域的应用及相关研究]。

Q3 Medicine
W Liu, J Wu, Y Qi, Y Yang, M He
{"title":"[一种改进的快速跟踪PACU出院评估工具在骨肿瘤学领域的应用及相关研究]。","authors":"W Liu, J Wu, Y Qi, Y Yang, M He","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20240920-00759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate the effectiveness of the modified post anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge assessment tool in the field of bone oncology, in order to prevent and reduce postoperative adverse events in patients undergoing bone tumor surgery. This is a prospective controlled study. 81 bone tumor patients who underwent general anesthesia surgery in the PACU from January to December 2023 were prospectively selected as the study subjects. They were randomly divided into a control group and an intervention group using a random number table method, with 43 and 38 cases, respectively. The control group and intervention group respectively used the fast track scoring system and the improved fast track scoring system as exit assessment tools. Independent sample <i>t</i>-test was used to compare the duration of PACU stay, mean arterial pressure (MAP) at PACU exit, heart rate, and blood oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>) between two groups of patients. Chi square test was used to compare the occurrence of adverse events between the two groups. The results showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the intervention group and the control group in terms of PACU dwell time [(55.58±23.83) min <i>vs</i>. (46.14±21.87) min], MAP at PACU [(88.23±11.52) mmHg <i>vs</i>. (86.25±10.62) mmHg], heart rate [(86.25±10.62) beats/min <i>vs</i>. (72.93±18.86) beats/min], and SpO<sub>2</sub> [(99.84±0.68)% <i>vs</i>. (99.86±0.91)%] (<i>t</i>=1.859, 0.805, 1.003, 0.101,all <i>P</i>>0.05). The total incidence of adverse events in the intervention group was significantly lower than the control group (68.42% <i>vs</i>. 90.70%, <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=4.988, <i>P</i><0.05). In conclusion, the modified fast-tracking criteria can significantly reduce the incidence of adverse events in PACU patients undergoing bone tumor surgery, but does not affect PACU dwell time and patient circulatory status.</p>","PeriodicalId":24033,"journal":{"name":"中华预防医学杂志","volume":"59 2","pages":"235-239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Application and related research of a modified fast-tracking PACU discharge assessment tool in the field of bone oncology].\",\"authors\":\"W Liu, J Wu, Y Qi, Y Yang, M He\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20240920-00759\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To evaluate the effectiveness of the modified post anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge assessment tool in the field of bone oncology, in order to prevent and reduce postoperative adverse events in patients undergoing bone tumor surgery. This is a prospective controlled study. 81 bone tumor patients who underwent general anesthesia surgery in the PACU from January to December 2023 were prospectively selected as the study subjects. They were randomly divided into a control group and an intervention group using a random number table method, with 43 and 38 cases, respectively. The control group and intervention group respectively used the fast track scoring system and the improved fast track scoring system as exit assessment tools. Independent sample <i>t</i>-test was used to compare the duration of PACU stay, mean arterial pressure (MAP) at PACU exit, heart rate, and blood oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>) between two groups of patients. Chi square test was used to compare the occurrence of adverse events between the two groups. The results showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the intervention group and the control group in terms of PACU dwell time [(55.58±23.83) min <i>vs</i>. (46.14±21.87) min], MAP at PACU [(88.23±11.52) mmHg <i>vs</i>. (86.25±10.62) mmHg], heart rate [(86.25±10.62) beats/min <i>vs</i>. (72.93±18.86) beats/min], and SpO<sub>2</sub> [(99.84±0.68)% <i>vs</i>. (99.86±0.91)%] (<i>t</i>=1.859, 0.805, 1.003, 0.101,all <i>P</i>>0.05). The total incidence of adverse events in the intervention group was significantly lower than the control group (68.42% <i>vs</i>. 90.70%, <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=4.988, <i>P</i><0.05). In conclusion, the modified fast-tracking criteria can significantly reduce the incidence of adverse events in PACU patients undergoing bone tumor surgery, but does not affect PACU dwell time and patient circulatory status.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":24033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华预防医学杂志\",\"volume\":\"59 2\",\"pages\":\"235-239\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华预防医学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20240920-00759\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华预防医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20240920-00759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评价改良PACU出院评估工具在骨肿瘤领域的有效性,以预防和减少骨肿瘤手术患者术后不良事件的发生。这是一项前瞻性对照研究。前瞻性选择2023年1 - 12月在PACU行全身麻醉手术的骨肿瘤患者81例作为研究对象。采用随机数字表法随机分为对照组和干预组,分别43例和38例。对照组和干预组分别采用快速通道评分系统和改进后的快速通道评分系统作为退出评估工具。采用独立样本t检验比较两组患者PACU停留时间、PACU退出时平均动脉压(MAP)、心率、血氧饱和度(SpO2)。采用卡方检验比较两组患者不良事件发生情况。结果显示,干预组与对照组PACU停留时间[(55.58±23.83)min vs(46.14±21.87)min]、PACU MAP[(88.23±11.52)mmHg vs(86.25±10.62)mmHg]、心率[(86.25±10.62)次/min vs(72.93±18.86)次/min]、SpO2[(99.84±0.68)% vs(99.86±0.91)%]差异均无统计学意义(t=1.859、0.805、1.003、0.101,P均为0.05)。干预组不良事件总发生率显著低于对照组(68.42%∶90.70%),χ2=4.988
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Application and related research of a modified fast-tracking PACU discharge assessment tool in the field of bone oncology].

To evaluate the effectiveness of the modified post anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge assessment tool in the field of bone oncology, in order to prevent and reduce postoperative adverse events in patients undergoing bone tumor surgery. This is a prospective controlled study. 81 bone tumor patients who underwent general anesthesia surgery in the PACU from January to December 2023 were prospectively selected as the study subjects. They were randomly divided into a control group and an intervention group using a random number table method, with 43 and 38 cases, respectively. The control group and intervention group respectively used the fast track scoring system and the improved fast track scoring system as exit assessment tools. Independent sample t-test was used to compare the duration of PACU stay, mean arterial pressure (MAP) at PACU exit, heart rate, and blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) between two groups of patients. Chi square test was used to compare the occurrence of adverse events between the two groups. The results showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the intervention group and the control group in terms of PACU dwell time [(55.58±23.83) min vs. (46.14±21.87) min], MAP at PACU [(88.23±11.52) mmHg vs. (86.25±10.62) mmHg], heart rate [(86.25±10.62) beats/min vs. (72.93±18.86) beats/min], and SpO2 [(99.84±0.68)% vs. (99.86±0.91)%] (t=1.859, 0.805, 1.003, 0.101,all P>0.05). The total incidence of adverse events in the intervention group was significantly lower than the control group (68.42% vs. 90.70%, χ2=4.988, P<0.05). In conclusion, the modified fast-tracking criteria can significantly reduce the incidence of adverse events in PACU patients undergoing bone tumor surgery, but does not affect PACU dwell time and patient circulatory status.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华预防医学杂志
中华预防医学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12678
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine (CJPM), the successor to Chinese Health Journal , was initiated on October 1, 1953. In 1960, it was amalgamated with the Chinese Medical Journal and the Journal of Medical History and Health Care , and thereafter, was renamed as People’s Care . On November 25, 1978, the publication was denominated as Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine . The contents of CJPM deal with a wide range of disciplines and technologies including epidemiology, environmental health, nutrition and food hygiene, occupational health, hygiene for children and adolescents, radiological health, toxicology, biostatistics, social medicine, pathogenic and epidemiological research in malignant tumor, surveillance and immunization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信