脑卒中预后评估与自动神经束造影分数各向异性(包括年龄)之间的关系。

IF 2.1 Q1 REHABILITATION
Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.5535/arm.240073
Midori Mochizuki, Yuki Uchiyama, Kazuhisa Domen, Tetsuo Koyama
{"title":"脑卒中预后评估与自动神经束造影分数各向异性(包括年龄)之间的关系。","authors":"Midori Mochizuki, Yuki Uchiyama, Kazuhisa Domen, Tetsuo Koyama","doi":"10.5535/arm.240073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association between outcomes, including affected extremity functions and activities of daily living (ADL), and fractional anisotropy (FA) derived from automated tractography incorporating age among patients after stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled stroke patients, and diffusion-tensor imaging was conducted during the second week. Standardized automated tractography was utilized to compute FA values in the corticospinal tract (CST), the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF), and the superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF). Outcome evaluations were performed at discharge from our affiliated rehabilitation facility. Extremity functions were assessed using the total scores of the motor component of the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS-motor). Independence levels in ADL were appraised through the motor and cognition components of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). For each outcome measure, multivariate regression analysis incorporated the FA values of the CST, the IFOF, and the SLF, along with age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two patients were enrolled in the final analytical database. Among the four explanatory variables, the CST emerged as the most influential factor for SIAS-motor scores. Conversely, age proved to be the primary determinant for both the motor and cognition components of FIM, surpassing the impact of FA metrics, including the CST and the IFOF.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The key influencing factors exhibited significant variations based on the targeted outcome assessments. Clinicians should be aware of these differences when utilizing neuroimaging techniques to predict stroke outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47738,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM","volume":" ","pages":"15-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11895057/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations Between Stroke Outcome Assessments and Automated Tractography Fractional Anisotropy Incorporating Age.\",\"authors\":\"Midori Mochizuki, Yuki Uchiyama, Kazuhisa Domen, Tetsuo Koyama\",\"doi\":\"10.5535/arm.240073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association between outcomes, including affected extremity functions and activities of daily living (ADL), and fractional anisotropy (FA) derived from automated tractography incorporating age among patients after stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled stroke patients, and diffusion-tensor imaging was conducted during the second week. Standardized automated tractography was utilized to compute FA values in the corticospinal tract (CST), the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF), and the superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF). Outcome evaluations were performed at discharge from our affiliated rehabilitation facility. Extremity functions were assessed using the total scores of the motor component of the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS-motor). Independence levels in ADL were appraised through the motor and cognition components of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). For each outcome measure, multivariate regression analysis incorporated the FA values of the CST, the IFOF, and the SLF, along with age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two patients were enrolled in the final analytical database. Among the four explanatory variables, the CST emerged as the most influential factor for SIAS-motor scores. Conversely, age proved to be the primary determinant for both the motor and cognition components of FIM, surpassing the impact of FA metrics, including the CST and the IFOF.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The key influencing factors exhibited significant variations based on the targeted outcome assessments. Clinicians should be aware of these differences when utilizing neuroimaging techniques to predict stroke outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47738,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11895057/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.240073\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.240073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估脑卒中后患者的预后(包括受影响的肢体功能和日常生活活动(ADL))与纳入年龄的自动神经束造影得出的分数各向异性(FA)之间的关系。方法:本研究纳入脑卒中患者,在第2周进行弥散张量成像。采用标准化自动神经束造影计算皮质脊髓束(CST)、额枕下束(IFOF)和上纵束(SLF)的FA值。从附属康复机构出院时进行结果评估。使用脑卒中损伤评估集(SIAS-motor)的运动部分的总分来评估肢体功能。通过功能独立性测试(FIM)的运动和认知部分评估ADL的独立性水平。对于每个结果测量,多变量回归分析结合了CST、IFOF和SLF的FA值以及年龄。结果:42例患者被纳入最终的分析数据库。在四个解释变量中,CST是影响sias -运动分数的最重要因素。相反,年龄被证明是FIM的运动和认知成分的主要决定因素,超过了包括CST和IFOF在内的FA指标的影响。结论:在针对性结局评估的基础上,关键影响因素存在显著差异。临床医生在利用神经成像技术预测中风结果时应注意这些差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Associations Between Stroke Outcome Assessments and Automated Tractography Fractional Anisotropy Incorporating Age.

Objective: To evaluate the association between outcomes, including affected extremity functions and activities of daily living (ADL), and fractional anisotropy (FA) derived from automated tractography incorporating age among patients after stroke.

Methods: This study enrolled stroke patients, and diffusion-tensor imaging was conducted during the second week. Standardized automated tractography was utilized to compute FA values in the corticospinal tract (CST), the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF), and the superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF). Outcome evaluations were performed at discharge from our affiliated rehabilitation facility. Extremity functions were assessed using the total scores of the motor component of the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS-motor). Independence levels in ADL were appraised through the motor and cognition components of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). For each outcome measure, multivariate regression analysis incorporated the FA values of the CST, the IFOF, and the SLF, along with age.

Results: Forty-two patients were enrolled in the final analytical database. Among the four explanatory variables, the CST emerged as the most influential factor for SIAS-motor scores. Conversely, age proved to be the primary determinant for both the motor and cognition components of FIM, surpassing the impact of FA metrics, including the CST and the IFOF.

Conclusion: The key influencing factors exhibited significant variations based on the targeted outcome assessments. Clinicians should be aware of these differences when utilizing neuroimaging techniques to predict stroke outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
32
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信