受伤工人的阿片类药物使用:疼痛和重返工作岗位的经历。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Victoria Nadalin, Nancy Carnide, Cameron Mustard, Colette N Severin, Andrea D Furlan, Peter M Smith
{"title":"受伤工人的阿片类药物使用:疼痛和重返工作岗位的经历。","authors":"Victoria Nadalin, Nancy Carnide, Cameron Mustard, Colette N Severin, Andrea D Furlan, Peter M Smith","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2024-109745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this cross-sectional analysis, we explored how return-to-work (RTW) experiences and postinjury pain are associated with opioid use after a workplace injury/illness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Workers with accepted lost-time claims, compensated by the workers' compensation board in Ontario, Canada were interviewed by telephone 18 months following a work-related physical injury/illness. Participants were asked about their past-year opioid use, current pain, RTW timing and workplace accommodations. Separate logistic regression analyses were conducted to estimate the association between two independent variables and opioid use: one combining the presence of pain with workplace accommodation and a second combining the presence of pain with RTW timing, adjusted for sociodemographic, work, injury and health covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1793 participants included in the analysis, 35.6% used opioids more than once in the past 12 months. Compared with those who did not return to work too soon and had no/mild pain, odds of opioid use were higher among those with severe pain, both those who returned too soon (OR 2.90, 95% CI 2.11 to 3.99) and those who did not return too soon (OR 3.01, 95% CI 2.16 to 4.19). Compared with those who had an offer of accommodation and no/mild pain, workers with severe pain and an accommodation offer (OR 2.78, 95% CI 2.16 to 3.57) or without an offer (OR 2.69, 95% CI 1.90 to 3.81) had increased odds of reporting use of opioids.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest pain is the main factor associated with opioid use after a work-related injury, irrespective of RTW experiences. However, due to the limitations of this exploratory analysis, longitudinal research examining this issue is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"49-52"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opioid use among injured workers: pain and the return-to-work experience.\",\"authors\":\"Victoria Nadalin, Nancy Carnide, Cameron Mustard, Colette N Severin, Andrea D Furlan, Peter M Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/oemed-2024-109745\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this cross-sectional analysis, we explored how return-to-work (RTW) experiences and postinjury pain are associated with opioid use after a workplace injury/illness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Workers with accepted lost-time claims, compensated by the workers' compensation board in Ontario, Canada were interviewed by telephone 18 months following a work-related physical injury/illness. Participants were asked about their past-year opioid use, current pain, RTW timing and workplace accommodations. Separate logistic regression analyses were conducted to estimate the association between two independent variables and opioid use: one combining the presence of pain with workplace accommodation and a second combining the presence of pain with RTW timing, adjusted for sociodemographic, work, injury and health covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1793 participants included in the analysis, 35.6% used opioids more than once in the past 12 months. Compared with those who did not return to work too soon and had no/mild pain, odds of opioid use were higher among those with severe pain, both those who returned too soon (OR 2.90, 95% CI 2.11 to 3.99) and those who did not return too soon (OR 3.01, 95% CI 2.16 to 4.19). Compared with those who had an offer of accommodation and no/mild pain, workers with severe pain and an accommodation offer (OR 2.78, 95% CI 2.16 to 3.57) or without an offer (OR 2.69, 95% CI 1.90 to 3.81) had increased odds of reporting use of opioids.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest pain is the main factor associated with opioid use after a work-related injury, irrespective of RTW experiences. However, due to the limitations of this exploratory analysis, longitudinal research examining this issue is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Occupational and Environmental Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"49-52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Occupational and Environmental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2024-109745\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2024-109745","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在本横断面分析中,我们探讨了工伤/疾病后重返工作岗位(RTW)经历和伤后疼痛与阿片类药物使用的关系。方法:接受损失时间索赔的工人,由加拿大安大略省工人赔偿委员会赔偿,在工伤/疾病18个月后通过电话采访。参与者被问及他们过去一年的阿片类药物使用情况、目前的疼痛、RTW时间和工作场所的住宿情况。进行了单独的逻辑回归分析,以估计两个自变量与阿片类药物使用之间的关联:一个将疼痛的存在与工作场所住宿相结合,另一个将疼痛的存在与RTW时间相结合,并根据社会人口统计学、工作、伤害和健康协变量进行了调整。结果:在纳入分析的1793名参与者中,35.6%的人在过去12个月内使用阿片类药物不止一次。与那些没有过早恢复工作并且没有/轻微疼痛的人相比,严重疼痛的人使用阿片类药物的几率更高,无论是那些过早恢复工作的人(OR 2.90, 95% CI 2.11至3.99)还是那些没有过早恢复工作的人(OR 3.01, 95% CI 2.16至4.19)。与那些有住宿条件且无/轻度疼痛的工人相比,有严重疼痛和住宿条件的工人(OR 2.78, 95% CI 2.16至3.57)或没有住宿条件的工人(OR 2.69, 95% CI 1.90至3.81)报告使用阿片类药物的几率增加。结论:研究结果表明,疼痛是与工伤后阿片类药物使用相关的主要因素,与RTW经历无关。然而,由于这种探索性分析的局限性,对这一问题进行纵向研究是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Opioid use among injured workers: pain and the return-to-work experience.

Objective: In this cross-sectional analysis, we explored how return-to-work (RTW) experiences and postinjury pain are associated with opioid use after a workplace injury/illness.

Methods: Workers with accepted lost-time claims, compensated by the workers' compensation board in Ontario, Canada were interviewed by telephone 18 months following a work-related physical injury/illness. Participants were asked about their past-year opioid use, current pain, RTW timing and workplace accommodations. Separate logistic regression analyses were conducted to estimate the association between two independent variables and opioid use: one combining the presence of pain with workplace accommodation and a second combining the presence of pain with RTW timing, adjusted for sociodemographic, work, injury and health covariates.

Results: Of 1793 participants included in the analysis, 35.6% used opioids more than once in the past 12 months. Compared with those who did not return to work too soon and had no/mild pain, odds of opioid use were higher among those with severe pain, both those who returned too soon (OR 2.90, 95% CI 2.11 to 3.99) and those who did not return too soon (OR 3.01, 95% CI 2.16 to 4.19). Compared with those who had an offer of accommodation and no/mild pain, workers with severe pain and an accommodation offer (OR 2.78, 95% CI 2.16 to 3.57) or without an offer (OR 2.69, 95% CI 1.90 to 3.81) had increased odds of reporting use of opioids.

Conclusions: Findings suggest pain is the main factor associated with opioid use after a work-related injury, irrespective of RTW experiences. However, due to the limitations of this exploratory analysis, longitudinal research examining this issue is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Occupational and Environmental Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
98
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Occupational and Environmental Medicine is an international peer reviewed journal covering current developments in occupational and environmental health worldwide. Occupational and Environmental Medicine publishes high-quality research relating to the full range of chemical, physical, ergonomic, biological and psychosocial hazards in the workplace and to environmental contaminants and their health effects. The journal welcomes research aimed at improving the evidence-based practice of occupational and environmental research; including the development and application of novel biological and statistical techniques in addition to evaluation of interventions in controlling occupational and environmental risks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信