双侧植入衍射三焦扩展焦深与衍射三焦疏水人工晶体临床效果的前瞻性比较。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Zoltán Z Nagy, Peter Dorman, Szilard Szalczer, Huba Kiss
{"title":"双侧植入衍射三焦扩展焦深与衍射三焦疏水人工晶体临床效果的前瞻性比较。","authors":"Zoltán Z Nagy, Peter Dorman, Szilard Szalczer, Huba Kiss","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20241113-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare clinical outcomes for patients implanted with either FineVision HP or FineVision Triumf intraocular lenses (IOL) (Beaver-Visitec International, Inc) following cataract surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-six patients bilaterally implanted with the HP IOL and 27 patients with the Triumf IOL were followed up for 6 months in a prospective randomized study. Refraction, uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected and distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA), and uncorrected and distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) were evaluated. Defocus curves and contrast sensitivity were also measured. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire 25, and adverse events were registered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-four percent of the eyes in both groups were within ±1.00 diopter (D) of spherical equivalent. All of the patients had 20/20 or better binocular CDVA in both groups and 96% and 100% had 20/25 or better binocular CDIVA in the Triumf and HP IOL groups, respectively, being reduced to 32% and 91.7% for DCNVA, respectively. Differences between groups were statistically significant from -2.00 to -4.50 D with better visual acuity outcomes for the HP IOL group (<i>P</i> < .01). Better monocular photopic contrast sensitivity was found for the Triumf IOL group at 12 and 18 cycles per degree (<i>P</i> < .01). There was a statistically significant increase of the overall composite score in both groups before and after surgery (<i>P</i> < .001). Spectacle independence was similar between groups for distance and intermediate vision but higher for the HP IOL for near vision (96% versus 75%). There were no adverse events related to the IOLs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both IOLs showed good and comparable distance and intermediate visual acuities but near vision was better for the HP IOL. This model provided higher spectacle independence for near vision. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2025;41(3):e102-e113.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"41 2","pages":"e102-e113"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective Comparison of Clinical Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation of Diffractive Trifocal Extended Depth-of-Focus and Diffractive Trifocal Hydrophobic Intraocular Lenses.\",\"authors\":\"Zoltán Z Nagy, Peter Dorman, Szilard Szalczer, Huba Kiss\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/1081597X-20241113-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare clinical outcomes for patients implanted with either FineVision HP or FineVision Triumf intraocular lenses (IOL) (Beaver-Visitec International, Inc) following cataract surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-six patients bilaterally implanted with the HP IOL and 27 patients with the Triumf IOL were followed up for 6 months in a prospective randomized study. Refraction, uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected and distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA), and uncorrected and distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) were evaluated. Defocus curves and contrast sensitivity were also measured. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire 25, and adverse events were registered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-four percent of the eyes in both groups were within ±1.00 diopter (D) of spherical equivalent. All of the patients had 20/20 or better binocular CDVA in both groups and 96% and 100% had 20/25 or better binocular CDIVA in the Triumf and HP IOL groups, respectively, being reduced to 32% and 91.7% for DCNVA, respectively. Differences between groups were statistically significant from -2.00 to -4.50 D with better visual acuity outcomes for the HP IOL group (<i>P</i> < .01). Better monocular photopic contrast sensitivity was found for the Triumf IOL group at 12 and 18 cycles per degree (<i>P</i> < .01). There was a statistically significant increase of the overall composite score in both groups before and after surgery (<i>P</i> < .001). Spectacle independence was similar between groups for distance and intermediate vision but higher for the HP IOL for near vision (96% versus 75%). There were no adverse events related to the IOLs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both IOLs showed good and comparable distance and intermediate visual acuities but near vision was better for the HP IOL. This model provided higher spectacle independence for near vision. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2025;41(3):e102-e113.]</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\"41 2\",\"pages\":\"e102-e113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20241113-01\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20241113-01","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较白内障手术后植入FineVision HP或FineVision Triumf人工晶体(IOL) (bever - visitec International, Inc .)的患者的临床结果。方法:对26例双侧HP人工晶状体患者和27例双侧Triumf人工晶状体患者进行为期6个月的前瞻性随机随访。评估屈光、未矫正和矫正的距离视力(CDVA)、未矫正和矫正的中间视力(DCIVA)、未矫正和矫正的近视力(DCNVA)。还测量了离焦曲线和对比灵敏度。使用美国国家眼科研究所视觉功能问卷25评估患者报告的结果,并记录不良事件。结果:两组94%的眼睛在±1.00屈光度(D)内的球面等效。两组患者双眼CDIVA均为20/20或更好,其中Triumf和HP IOL组分别有96%和100%的患者双眼CDIVA为20/25或更好,DCNVA组分别降至32%和91.7%。组间差异有统计学意义(-2.00 ~ -4.50 D), HP IOL组视力较好(P < 0.01)。Triumf人工晶状体组单眼光对比敏感度为12和18周期/度(P < 0.01)。两组患者术前、术后综合评分均有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。远视和中视力组之间的眼镜独立性相似,但近视HP IOL组的眼镜独立性更高(96%对75%)。无与人工晶状体相关的不良事件。结论:两种人工晶状体均具有良好的中远视力,但HP人工晶状体的近视力较好。该模型为近视力提供了更高的眼镜独立性。[J].中华眼科杂志,2015;41(3):1102 - 1113。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prospective Comparison of Clinical Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation of Diffractive Trifocal Extended Depth-of-Focus and Diffractive Trifocal Hydrophobic Intraocular Lenses.

Purpose: To compare clinical outcomes for patients implanted with either FineVision HP or FineVision Triumf intraocular lenses (IOL) (Beaver-Visitec International, Inc) following cataract surgery.

Methods: Twenty-six patients bilaterally implanted with the HP IOL and 27 patients with the Triumf IOL were followed up for 6 months in a prospective randomized study. Refraction, uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected and distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA), and uncorrected and distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) were evaluated. Defocus curves and contrast sensitivity were also measured. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire 25, and adverse events were registered.

Results: Ninety-four percent of the eyes in both groups were within ±1.00 diopter (D) of spherical equivalent. All of the patients had 20/20 or better binocular CDVA in both groups and 96% and 100% had 20/25 or better binocular CDIVA in the Triumf and HP IOL groups, respectively, being reduced to 32% and 91.7% for DCNVA, respectively. Differences between groups were statistically significant from -2.00 to -4.50 D with better visual acuity outcomes for the HP IOL group (P < .01). Better monocular photopic contrast sensitivity was found for the Triumf IOL group at 12 and 18 cycles per degree (P < .01). There was a statistically significant increase of the overall composite score in both groups before and after surgery (P < .001). Spectacle independence was similar between groups for distance and intermediate vision but higher for the HP IOL for near vision (96% versus 75%). There were no adverse events related to the IOLs.

Conclusions: Both IOLs showed good and comparable distance and intermediate visual acuities but near vision was better for the HP IOL. This model provided higher spectacle independence for near vision. [J Refract Surg. 2025;41(3):e102-e113.].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as: • Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics” • Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles • Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content • Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信