军人单侧、不对称和双侧耳鸣的患病率及其对残疾的影响。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1002/ohn.1153
Kristofer G Andren, John P Marinelli, Samuel A Spear, Samrita Thapa, Emily J Thielman, Isaac D Erbele, Kelly M Reavis
{"title":"军人单侧、不对称和双侧耳鸣的患病率及其对残疾的影响。","authors":"Kristofer G Andren, John P Marinelli, Samuel A Spear, Samrita Thapa, Emily J Thielman, Isaac D Erbele, Kelly M Reavis","doi":"10.1002/ohn.1153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to describe the prevalence of unilateral, asymmetric, and bilateral tinnitus by severity of tinnitus across hearing sensitivity within the Noise Outcomes In Service members Epidemiology (NOISE) Study cohort.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Multi-institutional tertiary referral centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Behavioral audiometric testing, tinnitus history, and tinnitus severity were described cross-sectionally. Tinnitus severity was assessed by the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI). The WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 was used to capture functional deficits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tinnitus prevalence within the NOISE cohort was 46% (644/1387). Among those with tinnitus, the mean age was 36.1 years (standard deviation = 9.7), and 86% (553/644) were male, reflecting the predominantly male composition of the overall study population. The majority (85%) had normal hearing, and the remaining (15%) had mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss. Bilateral tinnitus was the most prevalent (54%), followed by asymmetric (35%) and unilateral (11%). Severe tinnitus was reported in 24%, moderate in 38%, and no/mild in 38%. Compared to those with normal hearing, subjects with mild-to-moderate hearing loss had a higher prevalence of tinnitus (odds ratio (OR) = 2.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6-3.7), higher TFI scores (mean difference = 14.1, 95% CI: 9.4-18.7), and a higher proportion reporting severe versus mild tinnitus (OR = 3.7, 95% CI: 2.0-6.9). In individuals with mild-to-moderate hearing loss, the highest TFI and WHODAS scores were associated with bilateral tinnitus (49.0 and 28.2, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tinnitus is prevalent in people with military service history, both in those with and without sensorineural hearing loss. However, tinnitus had a greater impact on daily functioning among those with sensorineural hearing loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1608-1616"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of Unilateral, Asymmetric, and Bilateral Tinnitus in Military Personnel and Its Impact on Disability.\",\"authors\":\"Kristofer G Andren, John P Marinelli, Samuel A Spear, Samrita Thapa, Emily J Thielman, Isaac D Erbele, Kelly M Reavis\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ohn.1153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to describe the prevalence of unilateral, asymmetric, and bilateral tinnitus by severity of tinnitus across hearing sensitivity within the Noise Outcomes In Service members Epidemiology (NOISE) Study cohort.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Multi-institutional tertiary referral centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Behavioral audiometric testing, tinnitus history, and tinnitus severity were described cross-sectionally. Tinnitus severity was assessed by the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI). The WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 was used to capture functional deficits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tinnitus prevalence within the NOISE cohort was 46% (644/1387). Among those with tinnitus, the mean age was 36.1 years (standard deviation = 9.7), and 86% (553/644) were male, reflecting the predominantly male composition of the overall study population. The majority (85%) had normal hearing, and the remaining (15%) had mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss. Bilateral tinnitus was the most prevalent (54%), followed by asymmetric (35%) and unilateral (11%). Severe tinnitus was reported in 24%, moderate in 38%, and no/mild in 38%. Compared to those with normal hearing, subjects with mild-to-moderate hearing loss had a higher prevalence of tinnitus (odds ratio (OR) = 2.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6-3.7), higher TFI scores (mean difference = 14.1, 95% CI: 9.4-18.7), and a higher proportion reporting severe versus mild tinnitus (OR = 3.7, 95% CI: 2.0-6.9). In individuals with mild-to-moderate hearing loss, the highest TFI and WHODAS scores were associated with bilateral tinnitus (49.0 and 28.2, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tinnitus is prevalent in people with military service history, both in those with and without sensorineural hearing loss. However, tinnitus had a greater impact on daily functioning among those with sensorineural hearing loss.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1608-1616\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1153\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1153","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在描述服役人员噪音结果流行病学(噪音)研究队列中单侧、不对称和双侧耳鸣的流行程度,包括耳鸣严重程度和听力敏感性。研究设计:横断面研究。环境:多机构三级转诊中心。方法:对行为听力测试、耳鸣史和耳鸣严重程度进行横断面描述。耳鸣功能指数(TFI)评估耳鸣严重程度。采用世界卫生组织残疾评估表(WHODAS) 2.0来捕捉功能缺陷。结果:噪声队列中耳鸣患病率为46%(644/1387)。耳鸣患者的平均年龄为36.1岁(标准差为9.7),86%(553/644)为男性,反映了整体研究人群中男性占主导地位。大多数(85%)听力正常,其余(15%)有轻度至中度感音神经性听力损失。双侧耳鸣最常见(54%),其次是不对称耳鸣(35%)和单侧耳鸣(11%)。重度耳鸣占24%,中度耳鸣占38%,无/轻度耳鸣占38%。与听力正常的受试者相比,轻度至中度听力损失的受试者耳鸣患病率更高(优势比(OR) = 2.4, 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.6-3.7), TFI评分更高(平均差异= 14.1,95% CI: 9.4-18.7),重度耳鸣的比例高于轻度耳鸣(OR = 3.7, 95% CI: 2.0-6.9)。在轻度至中度听力损失的个体中,最高的TFI和WHODAS评分与双侧耳鸣相关(分别为49.0和28.2)。结论:耳鸣在有或无感音神经性听力损失的服兵役人群中普遍存在。然而,耳鸣对感音神经性听力损失患者的日常功能影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence of Unilateral, Asymmetric, and Bilateral Tinnitus in Military Personnel and Its Impact on Disability.

Objective: This study aims to describe the prevalence of unilateral, asymmetric, and bilateral tinnitus by severity of tinnitus across hearing sensitivity within the Noise Outcomes In Service members Epidemiology (NOISE) Study cohort.

Study design: A cross-sectional study.

Setting: Multi-institutional tertiary referral centers.

Methods: Behavioral audiometric testing, tinnitus history, and tinnitus severity were described cross-sectionally. Tinnitus severity was assessed by the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI). The WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 was used to capture functional deficits.

Results: Tinnitus prevalence within the NOISE cohort was 46% (644/1387). Among those with tinnitus, the mean age was 36.1 years (standard deviation = 9.7), and 86% (553/644) were male, reflecting the predominantly male composition of the overall study population. The majority (85%) had normal hearing, and the remaining (15%) had mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss. Bilateral tinnitus was the most prevalent (54%), followed by asymmetric (35%) and unilateral (11%). Severe tinnitus was reported in 24%, moderate in 38%, and no/mild in 38%. Compared to those with normal hearing, subjects with mild-to-moderate hearing loss had a higher prevalence of tinnitus (odds ratio (OR) = 2.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6-3.7), higher TFI scores (mean difference = 14.1, 95% CI: 9.4-18.7), and a higher proportion reporting severe versus mild tinnitus (OR = 3.7, 95% CI: 2.0-6.9). In individuals with mild-to-moderate hearing loss, the highest TFI and WHODAS scores were associated with bilateral tinnitus (49.0 and 28.2, respectively).

Conclusion: Tinnitus is prevalent in people with military service history, both in those with and without sensorineural hearing loss. However, tinnitus had a greater impact on daily functioning among those with sensorineural hearing loss.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信