评估抗真菌处方的适当性:在澳大利亚医院实施一种新型审计工具的关键结果。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
A Khanina, N Singh, R James, D C M Kong, M A Slavin, K A Thursky
{"title":"评估抗真菌处方的适当性:在澳大利亚医院实施一种新型审计工具的关键结果。","authors":"A Khanina, N Singh, R James, D C M Kong, M A Slavin, K A Thursky","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkaf044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To utilize the Antifungal National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey (Antifungal NAPS), a novel tool utilizing international consensus metrics for antifungal stewardship, to assess the quality of systemic antifungal prescribing in Australian hospitals, in order to identify quality improvement targets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participating hospitals were directed to audit all systemic antifungals or focus on a specific antifungal drug or class. Data entry into the Antifungal NAPS online portal occurred between October 2022 and June 2023. The data collection tool comprised patient details, reasons precluding use of antifungals, prescription details (guideline compliance, appropriateness, and reasons for inappropriate prescribing) and patient outcomes. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven hospitals contributed data for 516 prescriptions for 438 patients. Of these, 77.1% of prescriptions were appropriate, with the highest appropriateness for prophylactic (189/222; 85.1%), followed by directed (105/130; 80.8%) and empirical therapy (104/164; 63.4%). Fluconazole was the most commonly prescribed agent, which had the lowest rate of appropriateness (132/209; 63.2%). The most common reasons for inappropriate prescribing were no antifungal required (35/105; 33.3%), incorrect dose or frequency (30/105; 28.6%) and incorrect duration (19/105; 18.1%). Compliance with guidelines was 73.6%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study outlines the successful implementation of the Antifungal NAPS, a standardized electronic audit tool for the assessment of antifungal prescribing quality. Key areas for quality improvement identified were the overuse of empirical fluconazole for urinary tract and intra-abdominal infections, the importance of invasive fungal infection risk assessment to guide prophylaxis prescribing and greater infectious diseases and antifungal stewardship oversight of antifungal prescribing to guide optimal prescribing.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1127-1136"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the appropriateness of antifungal prescribing: key results from the implementation of a novel audit tool in Australian hospitals.\",\"authors\":\"A Khanina, N Singh, R James, D C M Kong, M A Slavin, K A Thursky\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jac/dkaf044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To utilize the Antifungal National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey (Antifungal NAPS), a novel tool utilizing international consensus metrics for antifungal stewardship, to assess the quality of systemic antifungal prescribing in Australian hospitals, in order to identify quality improvement targets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participating hospitals were directed to audit all systemic antifungals or focus on a specific antifungal drug or class. Data entry into the Antifungal NAPS online portal occurred between October 2022 and June 2023. The data collection tool comprised patient details, reasons precluding use of antifungals, prescription details (guideline compliance, appropriateness, and reasons for inappropriate prescribing) and patient outcomes. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven hospitals contributed data for 516 prescriptions for 438 patients. Of these, 77.1% of prescriptions were appropriate, with the highest appropriateness for prophylactic (189/222; 85.1%), followed by directed (105/130; 80.8%) and empirical therapy (104/164; 63.4%). Fluconazole was the most commonly prescribed agent, which had the lowest rate of appropriateness (132/209; 63.2%). The most common reasons for inappropriate prescribing were no antifungal required (35/105; 33.3%), incorrect dose or frequency (30/105; 28.6%) and incorrect duration (19/105; 18.1%). Compliance with guidelines was 73.6%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study outlines the successful implementation of the Antifungal NAPS, a standardized electronic audit tool for the assessment of antifungal prescribing quality. Key areas for quality improvement identified were the overuse of empirical fluconazole for urinary tract and intra-abdominal infections, the importance of invasive fungal infection risk assessment to guide prophylaxis prescribing and greater infectious diseases and antifungal stewardship oversight of antifungal prescribing to guide optimal prescribing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1127-1136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf044\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:利用抗真菌国家抗菌药物处方调查(anti真菌NAPS),一种利用国际共识指标进行抗真菌管理的新工具,评估澳大利亚医院系统抗真菌处方的质量,以确定质量改进目标。方法:要求参与调查的医院对所有系统抗真菌药物进行审核,或对特定的抗真菌药物或类别进行审核。antifungi NAPS在线门户网站的数据输入发生在2022年10月至2023年6月之间。数据收集工具包括患者详细信息、排除使用抗真菌药物的原因、处方详细信息(指南依从性、适当性和处方不当的原因)和患者结果。采用描述性统计方法对数据进行分析。结果:11家医院为438例患者提供了516张处方数据。其中,77.1%的处方是适当的,其中预防性处方的适当性最高(189/222;85.1%),其次是定向(105/130;80.8%)和经验疗法(104/164;63.4%)。氟康唑是最常用的处方药物,其适宜率最低(132/209;63.2%)。处方不当最常见的原因是不需要抗真菌药(35/105;33.3%),剂量或频率不正确(30/105;28.6%)和错误持续时间(19/105;18.1%)。遵循指南的比例为73.6%。结论:本研究概述了抗真菌nap的成功实施,这是一种用于评估抗真菌处方质量的标准化电子审计工具。确定的质量改进的关键领域是经验性氟康唑在尿路和腹腔感染中的过度使用,侵入性真菌感染风险评估对指导预防性处方和更大传染性疾病的重要性,以及抗真菌处方的抗真菌管理监督以指导最佳处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the appropriateness of antifungal prescribing: key results from the implementation of a novel audit tool in Australian hospitals.

Objectives: To utilize the Antifungal National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey (Antifungal NAPS), a novel tool utilizing international consensus metrics for antifungal stewardship, to assess the quality of systemic antifungal prescribing in Australian hospitals, in order to identify quality improvement targets.

Methods: Participating hospitals were directed to audit all systemic antifungals or focus on a specific antifungal drug or class. Data entry into the Antifungal NAPS online portal occurred between October 2022 and June 2023. The data collection tool comprised patient details, reasons precluding use of antifungals, prescription details (guideline compliance, appropriateness, and reasons for inappropriate prescribing) and patient outcomes. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data.

Results: Eleven hospitals contributed data for 516 prescriptions for 438 patients. Of these, 77.1% of prescriptions were appropriate, with the highest appropriateness for prophylactic (189/222; 85.1%), followed by directed (105/130; 80.8%) and empirical therapy (104/164; 63.4%). Fluconazole was the most commonly prescribed agent, which had the lowest rate of appropriateness (132/209; 63.2%). The most common reasons for inappropriate prescribing were no antifungal required (35/105; 33.3%), incorrect dose or frequency (30/105; 28.6%) and incorrect duration (19/105; 18.1%). Compliance with guidelines was 73.6%.

Conclusions: This study outlines the successful implementation of the Antifungal NAPS, a standardized electronic audit tool for the assessment of antifungal prescribing quality. Key areas for quality improvement identified were the overuse of empirical fluconazole for urinary tract and intra-abdominal infections, the importance of invasive fungal infection risk assessment to guide prophylaxis prescribing and greater infectious diseases and antifungal stewardship oversight of antifungal prescribing to guide optimal prescribing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.80%
发文量
423
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信