中国老年人抑郁城乡差异的关键可改变因素:中美比较研究

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Juxiang Yang, Yi Wang, Xi Zheng, Hongchu Wang, Gang Song
{"title":"中国老年人抑郁城乡差异的关键可改变因素:中美比较研究","authors":"Juxiang Yang, Yi Wang, Xi Zheng, Hongchu Wang, Gang Song","doi":"10.1016/j.inpsyc.2025.100046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Urban-rural differences in depression are evident among older adults in China but not in the United States. By comparing the two countries, this study aims to explore strategies for promoting regional equality in depression in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) and the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) were utilized. Longitudinal data were used to describe urban-rural differences in depression prevalence among older adults in China (2011-2020) and the United States (2010-2020). Cross-sectional data from 2018 (CHARLS: 9840 participants; HRS: 10,381 participants) were used to identify key modifiable factors. A random forest algorithm was employed to determine the most important factors influencing depression, and comparisons between the two countries were made to identify modifiable factors. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between these key modifiable factors and depression. A mediation model was applied to assess the mediating role of key modifiable factors in the relationship between residence and depression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1) From 2011 to 2020, Urban-rural differences in depression prevalence among older adults were observed in China, but not in the United States. 2) In both China and the U.S., the top five factors ranked by importance were activities of daily living disability (ADLs), instrumental activities of daily living disability (IADLs), pain levels, self-reported health (SRH), and age. However, Urban-Rural Differences in ADLs, IADLs, and SRH were present in China but not in the United States. 3) ADLs, IADLs, and SRH collectively mediated 31.6 % (95 % CI: 0.268 - 0.360) of the relationship between residence and depression scores among older adults in China.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Urban-rural differences in physical health status (ADLs, IADLs, and self-reported health) among older adults in China are associated with Urban-Rural Differences in depression. The absence of such inequalities in the U.S. may offer insights for developing policies to promote regional equality in depression among older adults in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":14368,"journal":{"name":"International psychogeriatrics","volume":" ","pages":"100046"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Key modifiable factors in urban-rural differences in depression among older adults in China: A comparative study between China and the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Juxiang Yang, Yi Wang, Xi Zheng, Hongchu Wang, Gang Song\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.inpsyc.2025.100046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Urban-rural differences in depression are evident among older adults in China but not in the United States. By comparing the two countries, this study aims to explore strategies for promoting regional equality in depression in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) and the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) were utilized. Longitudinal data were used to describe urban-rural differences in depression prevalence among older adults in China (2011-2020) and the United States (2010-2020). Cross-sectional data from 2018 (CHARLS: 9840 participants; HRS: 10,381 participants) were used to identify key modifiable factors. A random forest algorithm was employed to determine the most important factors influencing depression, and comparisons between the two countries were made to identify modifiable factors. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between these key modifiable factors and depression. A mediation model was applied to assess the mediating role of key modifiable factors in the relationship between residence and depression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1) From 2011 to 2020, Urban-rural differences in depression prevalence among older adults were observed in China, but not in the United States. 2) In both China and the U.S., the top five factors ranked by importance were activities of daily living disability (ADLs), instrumental activities of daily living disability (IADLs), pain levels, self-reported health (SRH), and age. However, Urban-Rural Differences in ADLs, IADLs, and SRH were present in China but not in the United States. 3) ADLs, IADLs, and SRH collectively mediated 31.6 % (95 % CI: 0.268 - 0.360) of the relationship between residence and depression scores among older adults in China.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Urban-rural differences in physical health status (ADLs, IADLs, and self-reported health) among older adults in China are associated with Urban-Rural Differences in depression. The absence of such inequalities in the U.S. may offer insights for developing policies to promote regional equality in depression among older adults in China.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International psychogeriatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"100046\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International psychogeriatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpsyc.2025.100046\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International psychogeriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpsyc.2025.100046","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:中国老年人抑郁的城乡差异很明显,但在美国没有。通过对两国的比较,本研究旨在探讨促进中国抑郁症地区平等的策略。方法:采用中国健康与退休纵向研究(CHARLS)和健康与退休研究(HRS)的数据。采用纵向数据描述中国(2011-2020年)和美国(2010-2020年)老年人抑郁症患病率的城乡差异。2018年的横断面数据(CHARLS: 9840名参与者;HRS: 10,381名参与者)用于确定关键的可修改因素。采用随机森林算法确定影响抑郁症的最重要因素,并对两国进行比较,以确定可改变的因素。采用多因素logistic回归分析这些关键可改变因素与抑郁症的关系。采用中介模型评估居住与抑郁关系中关键可调节因素的中介作用。结果:1)2011 - 2020年,中国老年人抑郁患病率存在城乡差异,但美国没有。2)中美两国重要性排名前5位的因素分别是日常生活残疾活动(ADLs)、日常生活残疾工具活动(IADLs)、疼痛水平、自我报告健康(SRH)和年龄。然而,ADLs、IADLs和SRH的城乡差异在中国存在,而在美国不存在。3)ADLs、IADLs和SRH共同介导了31.6% (95% CI: 0.268 ~ 0.360)的中国老年人居住与抑郁评分之间的关系。结论:中国老年人身体健康状况(ADLs、IADLs和自述健康)的城乡差异与抑郁的城乡差异有关。美国没有这种不平等现象,这可能为制定促进中国老年人抑郁症地区平等的政策提供启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Key modifiable factors in urban-rural differences in depression among older adults in China: A comparative study between China and the United States.

Objectives: Urban-rural differences in depression are evident among older adults in China but not in the United States. By comparing the two countries, this study aims to explore strategies for promoting regional equality in depression in China.

Methods: Data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) and the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) were utilized. Longitudinal data were used to describe urban-rural differences in depression prevalence among older adults in China (2011-2020) and the United States (2010-2020). Cross-sectional data from 2018 (CHARLS: 9840 participants; HRS: 10,381 participants) were used to identify key modifiable factors. A random forest algorithm was employed to determine the most important factors influencing depression, and comparisons between the two countries were made to identify modifiable factors. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between these key modifiable factors and depression. A mediation model was applied to assess the mediating role of key modifiable factors in the relationship between residence and depression.

Results: 1) From 2011 to 2020, Urban-rural differences in depression prevalence among older adults were observed in China, but not in the United States. 2) In both China and the U.S., the top five factors ranked by importance were activities of daily living disability (ADLs), instrumental activities of daily living disability (IADLs), pain levels, self-reported health (SRH), and age. However, Urban-Rural Differences in ADLs, IADLs, and SRH were present in China but not in the United States. 3) ADLs, IADLs, and SRH collectively mediated 31.6 % (95 % CI: 0.268 - 0.360) of the relationship between residence and depression scores among older adults in China.

Conclusion: Urban-rural differences in physical health status (ADLs, IADLs, and self-reported health) among older adults in China are associated with Urban-Rural Differences in depression. The absence of such inequalities in the U.S. may offer insights for developing policies to promote regional equality in depression among older adults in China.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International psychogeriatrics
International psychogeriatrics 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
217
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: A highly respected, multidisciplinary journal, International Psychogeriatrics publishes high quality original research papers in the field of psychogeriatrics. The journal aims to be the leading peer reviewed journal dealing with all aspects of the mental health of older people throughout the world. Circulated to over 1,000 members of the International Psychogeriatric Association, International Psychogeriatrics also features important editorials, provocative debates, literature reviews, book reviews and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信