{"title":"两种经阴道温控射频治疗女性压力性尿失禁的疗效观察。","authors":"Xiao-Xiao Wang, Ying Xu, Yan-Feng Song, Xiao-Hua Zheng, Xiao-Xiang Jiang, Chao-Qin Lin","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06065-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>This study was aimed at comparing the efficacy of different modes of transvaginal temperature-controlled radiofrequency (TTCRF) in improving female stress urinary incontinence (SUI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized trial with a nested prospective cohort included 89 women with SUI, who were randomized into a unipolar group (n = 35) and a comprehensive group (n = 54). The comprehensive mode group was treated with unipolar and bipolar combination therapy. The 1-h pad test (1-h PWT) was used as the primary metric by which to gauge improvement of SUI. The effective rate was defined as (cure + improvement cases/total cases) × 100%. Daily leakage episodes and urinary incontinence questionnaires were also documented to compliment this metric in assessing treatment efficacy. Patient satisfaction was assessed and adverse reactions were monitored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference in the effective rate between the unipolar and comprehensive groups was observed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the end of treatment (62.9% vs 66.7%, 68.6% vs 68.5%, 80.0% vs 71.7%, 74.3% vs 62.5% respectively). Objective improvement of SUI symptoms and subjective satisfaction for all SUI patients were achieved after TTCRF treatment. Ten-course treatment of TTCRF achieved significantly greater treatment effects than five-course treatment as measured by 1-h PWT, daily leakage episodes, International Consultation on Incontinent Questionnaire-Short Form, and Pelvic Organ Prolapsed-Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-12. No significant side effects occurred in any patients during treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We consider TTCRF treatment to be a viable outpatient option for SUI, with unipolar and comprehensive modes both showing similar efficacy for SUI.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Two Modes of Transvaginal Temperature-Controlled Radiofrequency for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence.\",\"authors\":\"Xiao-Xiao Wang, Ying Xu, Yan-Feng Song, Xiao-Hua Zheng, Xiao-Xiang Jiang, Chao-Qin Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00192-025-06065-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>This study was aimed at comparing the efficacy of different modes of transvaginal temperature-controlled radiofrequency (TTCRF) in improving female stress urinary incontinence (SUI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized trial with a nested prospective cohort included 89 women with SUI, who were randomized into a unipolar group (n = 35) and a comprehensive group (n = 54). The comprehensive mode group was treated with unipolar and bipolar combination therapy. The 1-h pad test (1-h PWT) was used as the primary metric by which to gauge improvement of SUI. The effective rate was defined as (cure + improvement cases/total cases) × 100%. Daily leakage episodes and urinary incontinence questionnaires were also documented to compliment this metric in assessing treatment efficacy. Patient satisfaction was assessed and adverse reactions were monitored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference in the effective rate between the unipolar and comprehensive groups was observed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the end of treatment (62.9% vs 66.7%, 68.6% vs 68.5%, 80.0% vs 71.7%, 74.3% vs 62.5% respectively). Objective improvement of SUI symptoms and subjective satisfaction for all SUI patients were achieved after TTCRF treatment. Ten-course treatment of TTCRF achieved significantly greater treatment effects than five-course treatment as measured by 1-h PWT, daily leakage episodes, International Consultation on Incontinent Questionnaire-Short Form, and Pelvic Organ Prolapsed-Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-12. No significant side effects occurred in any patients during treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We consider TTCRF treatment to be a viable outpatient option for SUI, with unipolar and comprehensive modes both showing similar efficacy for SUI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Urogynecology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Urogynecology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06065-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06065-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
前言与假设:本研究旨在比较不同模式经阴道温控射频(TTCRF)治疗女性压力性尿失禁(SUI)的疗效。方法:采用嵌套前瞻性队列随机试验,纳入89名SUI女性,随机分为单极组(n = 35)和综合组(n = 54)。综合模式组采用单极与双极联合治疗。1小时尿垫试验(1小时PWT)被用作衡量SUI改善的主要指标。有效率定义为(治愈+好转例数/总例数)× 100%。每日泄漏事件和尿失禁问卷也被记录下来,以补充评估治疗效果的这一指标。评估患者满意度并监测不良反应。结果:单极组与综合组在治疗结束后1、3、6、12个月的有效率差异无统计学意义(分别为62.9% vs 66.7%, 68.6% vs 68.5%, 80.0% vs 71.7%, 74.3% vs 62.5%)。所有SUI患者经TTCRF治疗后,均达到了SUI症状的客观改善和主观满意度。通过1小时PWT、每日渗漏次数、国际失禁咨询问卷-短表和盆腔器官脱垂-尿失禁性问卷-12来衡量,10个疗程的TTCRF治疗效果明显优于5个疗程。治疗过程中无明显副作用发生。结论:我们认为TTCRF治疗是SUI的一种可行的门诊选择,单极和综合治疗方式对SUI的疗效相似。
Efficacy of Two Modes of Transvaginal Temperature-Controlled Radiofrequency for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Introduction and hypothesis: This study was aimed at comparing the efficacy of different modes of transvaginal temperature-controlled radiofrequency (TTCRF) in improving female stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Methods: A randomized trial with a nested prospective cohort included 89 women with SUI, who were randomized into a unipolar group (n = 35) and a comprehensive group (n = 54). The comprehensive mode group was treated with unipolar and bipolar combination therapy. The 1-h pad test (1-h PWT) was used as the primary metric by which to gauge improvement of SUI. The effective rate was defined as (cure + improvement cases/total cases) × 100%. Daily leakage episodes and urinary incontinence questionnaires were also documented to compliment this metric in assessing treatment efficacy. Patient satisfaction was assessed and adverse reactions were monitored.
Results: No significant difference in the effective rate between the unipolar and comprehensive groups was observed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the end of treatment (62.9% vs 66.7%, 68.6% vs 68.5%, 80.0% vs 71.7%, 74.3% vs 62.5% respectively). Objective improvement of SUI symptoms and subjective satisfaction for all SUI patients were achieved after TTCRF treatment. Ten-course treatment of TTCRF achieved significantly greater treatment effects than five-course treatment as measured by 1-h PWT, daily leakage episodes, International Consultation on Incontinent Questionnaire-Short Form, and Pelvic Organ Prolapsed-Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-12. No significant side effects occurred in any patients during treatment.
Conclusions: We consider TTCRF treatment to be a viable outpatient option for SUI, with unipolar and comprehensive modes both showing similar efficacy for SUI.
期刊介绍:
The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion