住院患者免疫治疗结果研究:多中心回顾性分析。

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Fauzia Riaz, John L Vaughn, Huili Zhu, James C Dickerson, Hoda E Sayegh, Samantha Brongiel, Elena Baldwin, Melanie W Kier, Jacob Zaemes, Caleb Hearn, Osama Abdelghany, Roger B Cohen, Ravi B Parikh, Joshua E Reuss, Elizabeth Prsic, Deborah B Doroshow
{"title":"住院患者免疫治疗结果研究:多中心回顾性分析。","authors":"Fauzia Riaz, John L Vaughn, Huili Zhu, James C Dickerson, Hoda E Sayegh, Samantha Brongiel, Elena Baldwin, Melanie W Kier, Jacob Zaemes, Caleb Hearn, Osama Abdelghany, Roger B Cohen, Ravi B Parikh, Joshua E Reuss, Elizabeth Prsic, Deborah B Doroshow","doi":"10.1200/OP-24-00788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the care of patients with cancer, but use among hospitalized patients is controversial as a result of questionable benefit and high costs. To evaluate the role of ICIs in the inpatient (IP) setting, we conducted the Inpatient Immunotherapy Outcomes Study (IIOS) to describe characteristics and outcomes of patients who received IP ICIs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>IIOS is a retrospective study of patients treated with ICIs during hospitalization between 2012 and 2021 at five academic institutions. Data collection was performed using each institution's electronic medical record. We estimated overall survival (OS) from the first administration of ICI using the Kaplan-Meier method and used adjusted Cox proportional hazards models to explore associations between clinicodemographic variables and OS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred fifteen patients received IP ICIs (median age 60 years; 55% White; 14% Black; 13% Hispanic). Thoracic and head and neck (24%), GI (21%), and hematologic (19%) malignancies were most common. Most of the patients were ICI-naïve (75%), had stage IV solid malignancies (75%) at the time of IP ICI initiation, and had no radiographic response to ICI therapy (88%). Median OS from the first IP ICI dose was 1.55 months (95% CI, 1.08 to 1.81) for all patients and 1.28 months (95% CI, 0.95 to 1.80) for patients with advanced solid malignancies. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model analysis found no clinicodemographic variables associated with improved OS after IP ICI administration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IIOS is the largest multi-institutional effort to describe outcomes after IP ICI administration. Clinical outcomes are poor after IP ICI use and IP ICIs should be used with caution.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"OP2400788"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inpatient Immunotherapy Outcomes Study: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Fauzia Riaz, John L Vaughn, Huili Zhu, James C Dickerson, Hoda E Sayegh, Samantha Brongiel, Elena Baldwin, Melanie W Kier, Jacob Zaemes, Caleb Hearn, Osama Abdelghany, Roger B Cohen, Ravi B Parikh, Joshua E Reuss, Elizabeth Prsic, Deborah B Doroshow\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/OP-24-00788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the care of patients with cancer, but use among hospitalized patients is controversial as a result of questionable benefit and high costs. To evaluate the role of ICIs in the inpatient (IP) setting, we conducted the Inpatient Immunotherapy Outcomes Study (IIOS) to describe characteristics and outcomes of patients who received IP ICIs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>IIOS is a retrospective study of patients treated with ICIs during hospitalization between 2012 and 2021 at five academic institutions. Data collection was performed using each institution's electronic medical record. We estimated overall survival (OS) from the first administration of ICI using the Kaplan-Meier method and used adjusted Cox proportional hazards models to explore associations between clinicodemographic variables and OS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred fifteen patients received IP ICIs (median age 60 years; 55% White; 14% Black; 13% Hispanic). Thoracic and head and neck (24%), GI (21%), and hematologic (19%) malignancies were most common. Most of the patients were ICI-naïve (75%), had stage IV solid malignancies (75%) at the time of IP ICI initiation, and had no radiographic response to ICI therapy (88%). Median OS from the first IP ICI dose was 1.55 months (95% CI, 1.08 to 1.81) for all patients and 1.28 months (95% CI, 0.95 to 1.80) for patients with advanced solid malignancies. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model analysis found no clinicodemographic variables associated with improved OS after IP ICI administration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IIOS is the largest multi-institutional effort to describe outcomes after IP ICI administration. Clinical outcomes are poor after IP ICI use and IP ICIs should be used with caution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO oncology practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"OP2400788\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO oncology practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-24-00788\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-24-00788","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)已经彻底改变了癌症患者的护理,但由于疗效可疑和成本高,在住院患者中的使用存在争议。为了评估ICIs在住院患者(IP)环境中的作用,我们进行了住院患者免疫治疗结果研究(IIOS),以描述接受IP ICIs患者的特征和结果。方法:IIOS是一项回顾性研究,研究对象是2012年至2021年在5个学术机构住院期间接受ICIs治疗的患者。使用每家机构的电子病历进行数据收集。我们使用Kaplan-Meier方法估计了首次给药后的总生存期(OS),并使用调整后的Cox比例风险模型来探索临床人口学变量与OS之间的关系。结果:215例患者接受了IP ICIs(中位年龄60岁;55%的白人;14%是黑人;13%的西班牙裔)。胸部和头颈部(24%)、胃肠道(21%)和血液系统(19%)恶性肿瘤最为常见。大多数患者ICI-naïve(75%),在IP ICI开始时为IV期实体恶性肿瘤(75%),并且对ICI治疗没有放射学反应(88%)。所有患者第一次IP ICI剂量的中位OS为1.55个月(95% CI, 1.08 - 1.81),晚期实体恶性肿瘤患者的中位OS为1.28个月(95% CI, 0.95 - 1.80)。多变量Cox比例风险模型分析发现,没有临床人口学变量与使用ipici后OS改善相关。结论:IIOS是描述IP ICI管理后结果的最大的多机构努力。使用IP ICI后临床结果较差,应谨慎使用IP ICI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inpatient Immunotherapy Outcomes Study: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.

Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the care of patients with cancer, but use among hospitalized patients is controversial as a result of questionable benefit and high costs. To evaluate the role of ICIs in the inpatient (IP) setting, we conducted the Inpatient Immunotherapy Outcomes Study (IIOS) to describe characteristics and outcomes of patients who received IP ICIs.

Methods: IIOS is a retrospective study of patients treated with ICIs during hospitalization between 2012 and 2021 at five academic institutions. Data collection was performed using each institution's electronic medical record. We estimated overall survival (OS) from the first administration of ICI using the Kaplan-Meier method and used adjusted Cox proportional hazards models to explore associations between clinicodemographic variables and OS.

Results: Two hundred fifteen patients received IP ICIs (median age 60 years; 55% White; 14% Black; 13% Hispanic). Thoracic and head and neck (24%), GI (21%), and hematologic (19%) malignancies were most common. Most of the patients were ICI-naïve (75%), had stage IV solid malignancies (75%) at the time of IP ICI initiation, and had no radiographic response to ICI therapy (88%). Median OS from the first IP ICI dose was 1.55 months (95% CI, 1.08 to 1.81) for all patients and 1.28 months (95% CI, 0.95 to 1.80) for patients with advanced solid malignancies. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model analysis found no clinicodemographic variables associated with improved OS after IP ICI administration.

Conclusion: IIOS is the largest multi-institutional effort to describe outcomes after IP ICI administration. Clinical outcomes are poor after IP ICI use and IP ICIs should be used with caution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信