与研究辐照装置的用户建立共识,以促进源型更换。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Danette R Fennesy, Janet M Gutiérrez, Scott J Patlovich, Robert J Emery
{"title":"与研究辐照装置的用户建立共识,以促进源型更换。","authors":"Danette R Fennesy, Janet M Gutiérrez, Scott J Patlovich, Robert J Emery","doi":"10.1097/HP.0000000000001840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The ability to irradiate cells, tissues, and other biological materials with high-energy photons has been an essential tool in the discovery of numerous biomedical research advancements. Historically, such irradiation was accomplished using sealed sources of radioactive materials in the form of 137Cs or 60Co. After the tragic events of 11 September 2001, a particular focus was placed on the vulnerability that irradiators represented due to the potential malicious acts that might lead to the creation of a radiological exposure or dispersal device. To mitigate this risk exposure, the United States Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) developed programs to both enhance the security associated with these devices and to incentivize the replacement of the units with x-ray-based technology. However, a significant barrier to engagement with the exchange program is the hesitancy on the part of the research community that does not wish to disrupt existing and established research protocols. This hesitancy stems from an inherent desire to adhere to the scientific process with the strict control of variables so that a single aspect can be isolated and then determined to result in an effect. A change from a gamma source to an x-ray source introduces a variable that warrants careful consideration and could have significant scientific and data-related impacts. Described here is the process undertaken by the radiation safety program for a major academic biomedical research institution to successfully transition from the use of gamma irradiators to x-ray devices without disrupting or negatively impacting critical research activities. The key to this successful transition was the establishment of consensus amongst the scientific and administrative communities prior to any formal commitment to the NNSA for the replacement endeavor. Ultimately, the researchers have found success in the transition and use of the x-ray irradiator replacements.</p>","PeriodicalId":12976,"journal":{"name":"Health physics","volume":"128 3","pages":"222-226"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishing Consensus with Users of Research Irradiator Devices to Facilitate Source Type Replacement.\",\"authors\":\"Danette R Fennesy, Janet M Gutiérrez, Scott J Patlovich, Robert J Emery\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HP.0000000000001840\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The ability to irradiate cells, tissues, and other biological materials with high-energy photons has been an essential tool in the discovery of numerous biomedical research advancements. Historically, such irradiation was accomplished using sealed sources of radioactive materials in the form of 137Cs or 60Co. After the tragic events of 11 September 2001, a particular focus was placed on the vulnerability that irradiators represented due to the potential malicious acts that might lead to the creation of a radiological exposure or dispersal device. To mitigate this risk exposure, the United States Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) developed programs to both enhance the security associated with these devices and to incentivize the replacement of the units with x-ray-based technology. However, a significant barrier to engagement with the exchange program is the hesitancy on the part of the research community that does not wish to disrupt existing and established research protocols. This hesitancy stems from an inherent desire to adhere to the scientific process with the strict control of variables so that a single aspect can be isolated and then determined to result in an effect. A change from a gamma source to an x-ray source introduces a variable that warrants careful consideration and could have significant scientific and data-related impacts. Described here is the process undertaken by the radiation safety program for a major academic biomedical research institution to successfully transition from the use of gamma irradiators to x-ray devices without disrupting or negatively impacting critical research activities. The key to this successful transition was the establishment of consensus amongst the scientific and administrative communities prior to any formal commitment to the NNSA for the replacement endeavor. Ultimately, the researchers have found success in the transition and use of the x-ray irradiator replacements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health physics\",\"volume\":\"128 3\",\"pages\":\"222-226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000001840\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000001840","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:用高能光子照射细胞、组织和其他生物材料的能力已经成为发现许多生物医学研究进展的重要工具。从历史上看,这种辐照是使用137Cs或60Co形式的放射性物质的密封源来完成的。在2001年9月11日的悲惨事件之后,由于潜在的恶意行为可能导致产生辐射照射或扩散装置,辐照器所代表的脆弱性受到了特别关注。为了减轻这种风险,美国能源部国家核安全管理局(NNSA)制定了相关计划,以加强与这些设备相关的安全性,并鼓励用基于x射线的技术替换这些设备。然而,参与交流计划的一个重大障碍是研究界的犹豫不决,他们不希望破坏现有和已建立的研究协议。这种犹豫源于一种内在的渴望,即坚持科学的过程,严格控制变量,以便可以分离出单个方面,然后确定其结果。从伽马源到x射线源的变化引入了一个值得仔细考虑的变量,并且可能对科学和数据相关产生重大影响。这里描述的是一个主要学术生物医学研究机构的辐射安全计划所承担的过程,该计划成功地从使用伽马辐射器过渡到x射线设备,而不会中断或对关键的研究活动产生负面影响。这一成功过渡的关键在于,在向国家核安全管理局就替换工作作出任何正式承诺之前,科学界和管理界达成共识。最终,研究人员在过渡和使用x射线照射器替代品方面取得了成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Establishing Consensus with Users of Research Irradiator Devices to Facilitate Source Type Replacement.

Abstract: The ability to irradiate cells, tissues, and other biological materials with high-energy photons has been an essential tool in the discovery of numerous biomedical research advancements. Historically, such irradiation was accomplished using sealed sources of radioactive materials in the form of 137Cs or 60Co. After the tragic events of 11 September 2001, a particular focus was placed on the vulnerability that irradiators represented due to the potential malicious acts that might lead to the creation of a radiological exposure or dispersal device. To mitigate this risk exposure, the United States Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) developed programs to both enhance the security associated with these devices and to incentivize the replacement of the units with x-ray-based technology. However, a significant barrier to engagement with the exchange program is the hesitancy on the part of the research community that does not wish to disrupt existing and established research protocols. This hesitancy stems from an inherent desire to adhere to the scientific process with the strict control of variables so that a single aspect can be isolated and then determined to result in an effect. A change from a gamma source to an x-ray source introduces a variable that warrants careful consideration and could have significant scientific and data-related impacts. Described here is the process undertaken by the radiation safety program for a major academic biomedical research institution to successfully transition from the use of gamma irradiators to x-ray devices without disrupting or negatively impacting critical research activities. The key to this successful transition was the establishment of consensus amongst the scientific and administrative communities prior to any formal commitment to the NNSA for the replacement endeavor. Ultimately, the researchers have found success in the transition and use of the x-ray irradiator replacements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health physics
Health physics 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
324
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Physics, first published in 1958, provides the latest research to a wide variety of radiation safety professionals including health physicists, nuclear chemists, medical physicists, and radiation safety officers with interests in nuclear and radiation science. The Journal allows professionals in these and other disciplines in science and engineering to stay on the cutting edge of scientific and technological advances in the field of radiation safety. The Journal publishes original papers, technical notes, articles on advances in practical applications, editorials, and correspondence. Journal articles report on the latest findings in theoretical, practical, and applied disciplines of epidemiology and radiation effects, radiation biology and radiation science, radiation ecology, and related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信