患者和护理人员对肺癌治疗决策的见解:一个探索性焦点小组。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Current Medical Research and Opinion Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1080/03007995.2025.2456009
Julie Vanderpoel, Nida Imran, Andy L Johnson, Susan Hutter, Karen Fixler, Christine Holcomb, Wesley Peters, Lisa Shea
{"title":"患者和护理人员对肺癌治疗决策的见解:一个探索性焦点小组。","authors":"Julie Vanderpoel, Nida Imran, Andy L Johnson, Susan Hutter, Karen Fixler, Christine Holcomb, Wesley Peters, Lisa Shea","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2025.2456009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We describe discussions about the lung cancer treatment decision-making process across the patient journey from the perspective of patients and caregivers with diverse experiences of living with lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient preference studies show individuals with lung cancer usually favor more aggressive treatments despite adverse events (AEs), in pursuit of better survival. However, patients are frequently passive in treatment decisions, suggesting there are barriers impairing patients' abilities to engage in shared decision-making. To explore this further, we asked patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-positive lung cancer and their caregivers to complete surveys and participate in focus group discussions facilitated by research specialists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>US patients with lung cancer (<i>n</i> = 11) and caregivers (<i>n</i> = 4) took part in exploratory focus groups. While initial treatment decisions were mostly led by healthcare providers, participants became more engaged in their treatment over time. As in other studies, participants prioritized survival over AEs when selecting treatments and shared fears of being switched to less efficacious treatments or reduced dose if they disclosed AEs. Participants emphasized the importance of shared decision-making, early discussions about AEs, and access to patient advocates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Healthcare providers should distribute reliable educational materials and have early conversations with patients on individual lung cancer treatment, health-related quality of life goals, potential AEs, and distinguishing AEs from disease progression symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":" ","pages":"297-306"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient and caregiver insights into lung cancer treatment decision-making: an exploratory focus group.\",\"authors\":\"Julie Vanderpoel, Nida Imran, Andy L Johnson, Susan Hutter, Karen Fixler, Christine Holcomb, Wesley Peters, Lisa Shea\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03007995.2025.2456009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We describe discussions about the lung cancer treatment decision-making process across the patient journey from the perspective of patients and caregivers with diverse experiences of living with lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient preference studies show individuals with lung cancer usually favor more aggressive treatments despite adverse events (AEs), in pursuit of better survival. However, patients are frequently passive in treatment decisions, suggesting there are barriers impairing patients' abilities to engage in shared decision-making. To explore this further, we asked patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-positive lung cancer and their caregivers to complete surveys and participate in focus group discussions facilitated by research specialists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>US patients with lung cancer (<i>n</i> = 11) and caregivers (<i>n</i> = 4) took part in exploratory focus groups. While initial treatment decisions were mostly led by healthcare providers, participants became more engaged in their treatment over time. As in other studies, participants prioritized survival over AEs when selecting treatments and shared fears of being switched to less efficacious treatments or reduced dose if they disclosed AEs. Participants emphasized the importance of shared decision-making, early discussions about AEs, and access to patient advocates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Healthcare providers should distribute reliable educational materials and have early conversations with patients on individual lung cancer treatment, health-related quality of life goals, potential AEs, and distinguishing AEs from disease progression symptoms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Medical Research and Opinion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"297-306\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Medical Research and Opinion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2456009\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2456009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们从具有不同肺癌生活经历的患者和护理人员的角度描述关于肺癌治疗决策过程的讨论。方法:患者偏好研究表明,肺癌患者通常倾向于更积极的治疗,尽管不良事件(ae),以追求更好的生存。然而,患者在治疗决策中往往是被动的,这表明存在障碍,损害了患者参与共同决策的能力。为了进一步探讨这一点,我们要求表皮生长因子受体阳性肺癌患者及其护理人员完成调查并参加由研究专家主持的焦点小组讨论。结果:美国肺癌患者(n = 11)和护理人员(n = 4)参加了探索性焦点小组。虽然最初的治疗决定主要由医疗保健提供者领导,但随着时间的推移,参与者越来越投入到治疗中。与其他研究一样,参与者在选择治疗方法时优先考虑生存而不是不良反应,并且如果他们透露不良反应,他们都担心被转到效果较差的治疗方法或减少剂量。与会者强调了共同决策、早期讨论不良反应以及接触患者倡导者的重要性。结论:医疗保健提供者应分发可靠的教育材料,并与患者就个体肺癌治疗、健康相关生活质量目标、潜在不良事件以及将不良事件与疾病进展症状区分开来进行早期对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient and caregiver insights into lung cancer treatment decision-making: an exploratory focus group.

Objective: We describe discussions about the lung cancer treatment decision-making process across the patient journey from the perspective of patients and caregivers with diverse experiences of living with lung cancer.

Methods: Patient preference studies show individuals with lung cancer usually favor more aggressive treatments despite adverse events (AEs), in pursuit of better survival. However, patients are frequently passive in treatment decisions, suggesting there are barriers impairing patients' abilities to engage in shared decision-making. To explore this further, we asked patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-positive lung cancer and their caregivers to complete surveys and participate in focus group discussions facilitated by research specialists.

Results: US patients with lung cancer (n = 11) and caregivers (n = 4) took part in exploratory focus groups. While initial treatment decisions were mostly led by healthcare providers, participants became more engaged in their treatment over time. As in other studies, participants prioritized survival over AEs when selecting treatments and shared fears of being switched to less efficacious treatments or reduced dose if they disclosed AEs. Participants emphasized the importance of shared decision-making, early discussions about AEs, and access to patient advocates.

Conclusion: Healthcare providers should distribute reliable educational materials and have early conversations with patients on individual lung cancer treatment, health-related quality of life goals, potential AEs, and distinguishing AEs from disease progression symptoms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Current Medical Research and Opinion 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
247
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Medical Research and Opinion is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal for the rapid publication of original research on new and existing drugs and therapies, Phase II-IV studies, and post-marketing investigations. Equivalence, safety and efficacy/effectiveness studies are especially encouraged. Preclinical, Phase I, pharmacoeconomic, outcomes and quality of life studies may also be considered if there is clear clinical relevance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信