探讨印度眼科护理专业人员的近视管理实践:知识、态度、实践和障碍研究。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Clinical and Experimental Optometry Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1080/08164622.2024.2443479
Hari Hara Pradhyumna, Manoj K Manoharan, Nagaraju Konda, Pavan K Verkicharla
{"title":"探讨印度眼科护理专业人员的近视管理实践:知识、态度、实践和障碍研究。","authors":"Hari Hara Pradhyumna, Manoj K Manoharan, Nagaraju Konda, Pavan K Verkicharla","doi":"10.1080/08164622.2024.2443479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Rising myopia prevalence in Indian children necessitates an increase in the number of myopia practitioners across all states to effectively counteract its progression and prevent long-term visual impairment.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is limited information on how eye care practitioners perceive and practice myopia control treatments in India. This study aimed to assess the current knowledge, attitudes, practices, and barriers to initiating myopia management among eye care practitioners in India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A self-administered online questionnaire was distributed through social media platforms and emails to eye care practitioners from January 8 to 23, 2022. This survey comprised a total of 12 questions to seek information related to knowledge, attitudes, practices, and barriers associated with myopia management. Basic descriptive and percentage analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 423 respondents, optometrists were 66% (<i>n</i> = 279/423), followed by ophthalmologists (16%, <i>n</i> = 68/423) and trainees involving optometrists and ophthalmologists (18%, <i>n</i> = 76/423). Of all, only 22% (<i>n</i> = 94/423) indicated practicing myopia management. They gained knowledge through scientific articles (71%, <i>n</i> = 300/423), conferences, and continuous professional education (62%, <i>n</i> = 231/423). Low-concentration atropine eye drops are widely considered for myopia control by both optometrists (57%, <i>n</i> = 28/49) and ophthalmologists (97%, <i>n</i> = 38/39), along with behavioural and lifestyle modifications (55%, <i>n</i> = 27/49; 74%, <i>n</i> = 29/39). A smaller proportion preferred to under-correct myopia (20%, <i>n</i> = 19/94) to counteract progression. Among myopia practitioners, combination therapy was recommended by 24% (<i>n</i> = 12/49) of optometrists and 23% (<i>n</i> = 9/39) of ophthalmologists to halt progression if a single modality was ineffective. The major barriers to initiating myopia management were lack of awareness among parents (73%, <i>n</i> = 68/94), lack of education (34%, <i>n</i> = 143/423) and training (26%, <i>n</i> = 112/423) among practitioners, and unavailability of treatment modalities in various regions of India (18%, <i>n</i> = 76/423).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Only 1 out of 5 practitioners was actively involved in practicing myopia management. Barriers must be minimised through various means to enable routine myopia practice in clinics.</p>","PeriodicalId":10214,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Optometry","volume":" ","pages":"860-867"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring myopia management practices among eye care professionals in India: A knowledge, attitudes, practices, and barriers study.\",\"authors\":\"Hari Hara Pradhyumna, Manoj K Manoharan, Nagaraju Konda, Pavan K Verkicharla\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08164622.2024.2443479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Rising myopia prevalence in Indian children necessitates an increase in the number of myopia practitioners across all states to effectively counteract its progression and prevent long-term visual impairment.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is limited information on how eye care practitioners perceive and practice myopia control treatments in India. This study aimed to assess the current knowledge, attitudes, practices, and barriers to initiating myopia management among eye care practitioners in India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A self-administered online questionnaire was distributed through social media platforms and emails to eye care practitioners from January 8 to 23, 2022. This survey comprised a total of 12 questions to seek information related to knowledge, attitudes, practices, and barriers associated with myopia management. Basic descriptive and percentage analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 423 respondents, optometrists were 66% (<i>n</i> = 279/423), followed by ophthalmologists (16%, <i>n</i> = 68/423) and trainees involving optometrists and ophthalmologists (18%, <i>n</i> = 76/423). Of all, only 22% (<i>n</i> = 94/423) indicated practicing myopia management. They gained knowledge through scientific articles (71%, <i>n</i> = 300/423), conferences, and continuous professional education (62%, <i>n</i> = 231/423). Low-concentration atropine eye drops are widely considered for myopia control by both optometrists (57%, <i>n</i> = 28/49) and ophthalmologists (97%, <i>n</i> = 38/39), along with behavioural and lifestyle modifications (55%, <i>n</i> = 27/49; 74%, <i>n</i> = 29/39). A smaller proportion preferred to under-correct myopia (20%, <i>n</i> = 19/94) to counteract progression. Among myopia practitioners, combination therapy was recommended by 24% (<i>n</i> = 12/49) of optometrists and 23% (<i>n</i> = 9/39) of ophthalmologists to halt progression if a single modality was ineffective. The major barriers to initiating myopia management were lack of awareness among parents (73%, <i>n</i> = 68/94), lack of education (34%, <i>n</i> = 143/423) and training (26%, <i>n</i> = 112/423) among practitioners, and unavailability of treatment modalities in various regions of India (18%, <i>n</i> = 76/423).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Only 1 out of 5 practitioners was actively involved in practicing myopia management. Barriers must be minimised through various means to enable routine myopia practice in clinics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Optometry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"860-867\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Optometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08164622.2024.2443479\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08164622.2024.2443479","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床相关性:印度儿童近视患病率的上升需要在所有邦增加近视医生的数量,以有效地抵消其进展并防止长期视力损害。目的:关于印度眼科医生如何认识和实施近视控制治疗的信息有限。本研究旨在评估目前印度眼科医生开展近视管理的知识、态度、做法和障碍。方法:于2022年1月8日至23日,通过社交媒体平台和电子邮件向眼科医生发放自填在线问卷。本调查共包括12个问题,旨在了解与近视管理相关的知识、态度、实践和障碍。进行了基本的描述性和百分比分析。结果:在423名调查对象中,验光师占66% (n = 279/423),眼科医生占16% (n = 68/423),验光师和眼科医生共同参与的培训生占18% (n = 76/423)。其中,仅有22% (n = 94/423)表示进行近视管理。他们通过科学文章(71%,n = 300/423)、会议和继续专业教育(62%,n = 231/423)获得知识。验光师(57%,n = 28/49)和眼科医生(97%,n = 38/39)普遍认为低浓度阿托品滴眼液可用于控制近视,同时改变行为和生活方式(55%,n = 27/49;74%, n = 29/39)。较小比例的人倾向于不矫正近视(20%,n = 19/94)以抑制近视进展。在近视从业人员中,24% (n = 12/49)的验光师和23% (n = 9/39)的眼科医生推荐联合治疗,以阻止单一方式无效的近视进展。开展近视管理的主要障碍是父母缺乏意识(73%,n = 68/94),从业人员缺乏教育(34%,n = 143/423)和培训(26%,n = 112/423),以及印度各地区缺乏治疗方式(18%,n = 76/423)。结论:5名执业医师中仅有1人积极参与近视治疗实践。必须通过各种手段尽量减少障碍,使诊所能够进行常规的近视治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring myopia management practices among eye care professionals in India: A knowledge, attitudes, practices, and barriers study.

Clinical relevance: Rising myopia prevalence in Indian children necessitates an increase in the number of myopia practitioners across all states to effectively counteract its progression and prevent long-term visual impairment.

Purpose: There is limited information on how eye care practitioners perceive and practice myopia control treatments in India. This study aimed to assess the current knowledge, attitudes, practices, and barriers to initiating myopia management among eye care practitioners in India.

Methods: A self-administered online questionnaire was distributed through social media platforms and emails to eye care practitioners from January 8 to 23, 2022. This survey comprised a total of 12 questions to seek information related to knowledge, attitudes, practices, and barriers associated with myopia management. Basic descriptive and percentage analyses were performed.

Results: Among the 423 respondents, optometrists were 66% (n = 279/423), followed by ophthalmologists (16%, n = 68/423) and trainees involving optometrists and ophthalmologists (18%, n = 76/423). Of all, only 22% (n = 94/423) indicated practicing myopia management. They gained knowledge through scientific articles (71%, n = 300/423), conferences, and continuous professional education (62%, n = 231/423). Low-concentration atropine eye drops are widely considered for myopia control by both optometrists (57%, n = 28/49) and ophthalmologists (97%, n = 38/39), along with behavioural and lifestyle modifications (55%, n = 27/49; 74%, n = 29/39). A smaller proportion preferred to under-correct myopia (20%, n = 19/94) to counteract progression. Among myopia practitioners, combination therapy was recommended by 24% (n = 12/49) of optometrists and 23% (n = 9/39) of ophthalmologists to halt progression if a single modality was ineffective. The major barriers to initiating myopia management were lack of awareness among parents (73%, n = 68/94), lack of education (34%, n = 143/423) and training (26%, n = 112/423) among practitioners, and unavailability of treatment modalities in various regions of India (18%, n = 76/423).

Conclusion: Only 1 out of 5 practitioners was actively involved in practicing myopia management. Barriers must be minimised through various means to enable routine myopia practice in clinics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Optometry is a peer reviewed journal listed by ISI and abstracted by PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Citation Index and Current Contents. It publishes original research papers and reviews in clinical optometry and vision science. Debate and discussion of controversial scientific and clinical issues is encouraged and letters to the Editor and short communications expressing points of view on matters within the Journal''s areas of interest are welcome. The Journal is published six times annually.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信