{"title":"斯普林试验对亚急性和慢性颈椎神经根病的诊断性能:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Long-Huei Lin, Ting-Yu Lin, Ke-Vin Chang, Chih-Chen Tzang, Wei-Ting Wu, Levent Özçakar","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Spurling's test is commonly used to diagnose cervical radiculopathy (CR); however, its diagnostic accuracy varies across studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Spurling's test for cervical radiculopathy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov , Cochrane Library, and Physiotherapy Database was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies assessing Spurling's test against imaging or electrodiagnostic tests were included. A bivariate random-effects model calculated pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and log diagnostic odds ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity of Spurling's test was 0.53 (95% confidence interval: 0.29-0.78), higher with imaging (0.67) than with electrodiagnostic testing (0.31) as the reference standard. Combining neck rotation or extension increased sensitivity to 0.67, compared to 0.31 without. The pooled specificity was 0.92 (95% confidence interval: 0.88-0.96), 0.93 with imaging and 0.91 with electrodiagnostic testing as the reference standard. The pooled positive likelihood ratio was 3.28, negative likelihood ratio was 0.28, and the log diagnostic odds ratio was 2.74.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Spurling's test is highly specific but has low sensitivity for cervical radiculopathy diagnosis, making it better suited for confirmation than screening. Sensitivity may improve with added maneuvers and imaging as a reference.</p><p><strong>To claim cme credits: </strong>Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME.</p><p><strong>Cme objectives: </strong>Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to: 1) Understand the diagnostic performance of Spurling's test for cervical radiculopathy. 2) Identify strategies to improve diagnostic performance during clinical testing. 3) Recognize the clinical role of Spurling's Test in the diagnosis and management of cervical radiculopathy.</p><p><strong>Level: </strong>Advanced.</p><p><strong>Accreditation: </strong>The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) ™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"717-723"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Performance of Spurling's Test for the Assessment Subacute and Chronic Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Long-Huei Lin, Ting-Yu Lin, Ke-Vin Chang, Chih-Chen Tzang, Wei-Ting Wu, Levent Özçakar\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002707\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Spurling's test is commonly used to diagnose cervical radiculopathy (CR); however, its diagnostic accuracy varies across studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Spurling's test for cervical radiculopathy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov , Cochrane Library, and Physiotherapy Database was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies assessing Spurling's test against imaging or electrodiagnostic tests were included. A bivariate random-effects model calculated pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and log diagnostic odds ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity of Spurling's test was 0.53 (95% confidence interval: 0.29-0.78), higher with imaging (0.67) than with electrodiagnostic testing (0.31) as the reference standard. Combining neck rotation or extension increased sensitivity to 0.67, compared to 0.31 without. The pooled specificity was 0.92 (95% confidence interval: 0.88-0.96), 0.93 with imaging and 0.91 with electrodiagnostic testing as the reference standard. The pooled positive likelihood ratio was 3.28, negative likelihood ratio was 0.28, and the log diagnostic odds ratio was 2.74.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Spurling's test is highly specific but has low sensitivity for cervical radiculopathy diagnosis, making it better suited for confirmation than screening. Sensitivity may improve with added maneuvers and imaging as a reference.</p><p><strong>To claim cme credits: </strong>Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME.</p><p><strong>Cme objectives: </strong>Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to: 1) Understand the diagnostic performance of Spurling's test for cervical radiculopathy. 2) Identify strategies to improve diagnostic performance during clinical testing. 3) Recognize the clinical role of Spurling's Test in the diagnosis and management of cervical radiculopathy.</p><p><strong>Level: </strong>Advanced.</p><p><strong>Accreditation: </strong>The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) ™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"717-723\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002707\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002707","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diagnostic Performance of Spurling's Test for the Assessment Subacute and Chronic Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Objective: Spurling's test is commonly used to diagnose cervical radiculopathy (CR); however, its diagnostic accuracy varies across studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Spurling's test for cervical radiculopathy.
Design: A systematic search of PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov , Cochrane Library, and Physiotherapy Database was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies assessing Spurling's test against imaging or electrodiagnostic tests were included. A bivariate random-effects model calculated pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and log diagnostic odds ratios.
Results: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity of Spurling's test was 0.53 (95% confidence interval: 0.29-0.78), higher with imaging (0.67) than with electrodiagnostic testing (0.31) as the reference standard. Combining neck rotation or extension increased sensitivity to 0.67, compared to 0.31 without. The pooled specificity was 0.92 (95% confidence interval: 0.88-0.96), 0.93 with imaging and 0.91 with electrodiagnostic testing as the reference standard. The pooled positive likelihood ratio was 3.28, negative likelihood ratio was 0.28, and the log diagnostic odds ratio was 2.74.
Conclusions: Spurling's test is highly specific but has low sensitivity for cervical radiculopathy diagnosis, making it better suited for confirmation than screening. Sensitivity may improve with added maneuvers and imaging as a reference.
To claim cme credits: Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME.
Cme objectives: Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to: 1) Understand the diagnostic performance of Spurling's test for cervical radiculopathy. 2) Identify strategies to improve diagnostic performance during clinical testing. 3) Recognize the clinical role of Spurling's Test in the diagnosis and management of cervical radiculopathy.
Level: Advanced.
Accreditation: The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) ™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
期刊介绍:
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals.
Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).