斯普林试验对亚急性和慢性颈椎神经根病的诊断性能:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Long-Huei Lin, Ting-Yu Lin, Ke-Vin Chang, Chih-Chen Tzang, Wei-Ting Wu, Levent Özçakar
{"title":"斯普林试验对亚急性和慢性颈椎神经根病的诊断性能:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Long-Huei Lin, Ting-Yu Lin, Ke-Vin Chang, Chih-Chen Tzang, Wei-Ting Wu, Levent Özçakar","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Spurling's test is commonly used to diagnose cervical radiculopathy (CR); however, its diagnostic accuracy varies across studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Spurling's test for cervical radiculopathy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov , Cochrane Library, and Physiotherapy Database was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies assessing Spurling's test against imaging or electrodiagnostic tests were included. A bivariate random-effects model calculated pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and log diagnostic odds ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity of Spurling's test was 0.53 (95% confidence interval: 0.29-0.78), higher with imaging (0.67) than with electrodiagnostic testing (0.31) as the reference standard. Combining neck rotation or extension increased sensitivity to 0.67, compared to 0.31 without. The pooled specificity was 0.92 (95% confidence interval: 0.88-0.96), 0.93 with imaging and 0.91 with electrodiagnostic testing as the reference standard. The pooled positive likelihood ratio was 3.28, negative likelihood ratio was 0.28, and the log diagnostic odds ratio was 2.74.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Spurling's test is highly specific but has low sensitivity for cervical radiculopathy diagnosis, making it better suited for confirmation than screening. Sensitivity may improve with added maneuvers and imaging as a reference.</p><p><strong>To claim cme credits: </strong>Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME.</p><p><strong>Cme objectives: </strong>Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to: 1) Understand the diagnostic performance of Spurling's test for cervical radiculopathy. 2) Identify strategies to improve diagnostic performance during clinical testing. 3) Recognize the clinical role of Spurling's Test in the diagnosis and management of cervical radiculopathy.</p><p><strong>Level: </strong>Advanced.</p><p><strong>Accreditation: </strong>The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) ™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"717-723"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Performance of Spurling's Test for the Assessment Subacute and Chronic Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Long-Huei Lin, Ting-Yu Lin, Ke-Vin Chang, Chih-Chen Tzang, Wei-Ting Wu, Levent Özçakar\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002707\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Spurling's test is commonly used to diagnose cervical radiculopathy (CR); however, its diagnostic accuracy varies across studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Spurling's test for cervical radiculopathy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov , Cochrane Library, and Physiotherapy Database was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies assessing Spurling's test against imaging or electrodiagnostic tests were included. A bivariate random-effects model calculated pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and log diagnostic odds ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity of Spurling's test was 0.53 (95% confidence interval: 0.29-0.78), higher with imaging (0.67) than with electrodiagnostic testing (0.31) as the reference standard. Combining neck rotation or extension increased sensitivity to 0.67, compared to 0.31 without. The pooled specificity was 0.92 (95% confidence interval: 0.88-0.96), 0.93 with imaging and 0.91 with electrodiagnostic testing as the reference standard. The pooled positive likelihood ratio was 3.28, negative likelihood ratio was 0.28, and the log diagnostic odds ratio was 2.74.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Spurling's test is highly specific but has low sensitivity for cervical radiculopathy diagnosis, making it better suited for confirmation than screening. Sensitivity may improve with added maneuvers and imaging as a reference.</p><p><strong>To claim cme credits: </strong>Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME.</p><p><strong>Cme objectives: </strong>Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to: 1) Understand the diagnostic performance of Spurling's test for cervical radiculopathy. 2) Identify strategies to improve diagnostic performance during clinical testing. 3) Recognize the clinical role of Spurling's Test in the diagnosis and management of cervical radiculopathy.</p><p><strong>Level: </strong>Advanced.</p><p><strong>Accreditation: </strong>The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) ™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"717-723\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002707\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002707","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:spling试验(ST)是诊断颈神经根病(CR)的常用方法;然而,其诊断准确性因研究而异。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估ST对cr的诊断性能。设计:系统检索PubMed、ClinicalTrials.gov、Cochrane图书馆和物理治疗数据库,遵循PRISMA指南。通过影像学或电诊断测试评估ST的研究被纳入。双变量随机效应模型计算合并敏感性、特异性、似然比(LR)和对数诊断优势比。结果:8项研究符合纳入标准。ST的综合敏感性为0.53(95%可信区间[CI]: 0.29-0.78),影像学检查(0.67)高于电诊断检查(0.31)。结合颈部旋转或伸展将敏感性提高到0.67,而不结合的敏感性为0.31。合并特异性为0.92 (95% CI: 0.88-0.96),影像学检查为0.93,电诊断检查为0.91。合并阳性LR为3.28,阴性LR为0.28,对数诊断优势比为2.74。结论:ST对CR诊断特异性高,但敏感性低,更适合于确诊而非筛查。增加机动和成像作为参考,灵敏度可能会提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic Performance of Spurling's Test for the Assessment Subacute and Chronic Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Objective: Spurling's test is commonly used to diagnose cervical radiculopathy (CR); however, its diagnostic accuracy varies across studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Spurling's test for cervical radiculopathy.

Design: A systematic search of PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov , Cochrane Library, and Physiotherapy Database was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies assessing Spurling's test against imaging or electrodiagnostic tests were included. A bivariate random-effects model calculated pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and log diagnostic odds ratios.

Results: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity of Spurling's test was 0.53 (95% confidence interval: 0.29-0.78), higher with imaging (0.67) than with electrodiagnostic testing (0.31) as the reference standard. Combining neck rotation or extension increased sensitivity to 0.67, compared to 0.31 without. The pooled specificity was 0.92 (95% confidence interval: 0.88-0.96), 0.93 with imaging and 0.91 with electrodiagnostic testing as the reference standard. The pooled positive likelihood ratio was 3.28, negative likelihood ratio was 0.28, and the log diagnostic odds ratio was 2.74.

Conclusions: Spurling's test is highly specific but has low sensitivity for cervical radiculopathy diagnosis, making it better suited for confirmation than screening. Sensitivity may improve with added maneuvers and imaging as a reference.

To claim cme credits: Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME.

Cme objectives: Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to: 1) Understand the diagnostic performance of Spurling's test for cervical radiculopathy. 2) Identify strategies to improve diagnostic performance during clinical testing. 3) Recognize the clinical role of Spurling's Test in the diagnosis and management of cervical radiculopathy.

Level: Advanced.

Accreditation: The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) ™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
423
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals. Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信