{"title":"子宫内膜PRP对着床失败或子宫内膜薄的妇女生育结果的影响。","authors":"Naziye Gurkan, Tayfun Alper","doi":"10.1007/s00404-025-07948-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the effect of intrauterine platelet-rich plasma (PRP) treatment on frozen–thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles in patients with recurrent implantation failure.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The study group consisted of 150 patients. The patients were grouped only as those with thin endometria, those with recurrent implantation failure (RIF), and those with both thin endometria and RIF. All participants underwent frozen embryo transfer. The control group consisted of a total of 150 patients who had normal endometrial thickness and did not have a history of RIF and who presented to the clinic due to unexplained infertility. The rates of biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage and live birth were compared among the groups in terms of fertility outcomes.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>In 150 patients with a thin endometrium or a history of RIF who underwent PRP, the endometrial thickness was significantly greater than the pre-PRP endometrial thickness, and this value was found to be statistically significant (7.38 mm vs. 7.96 mm, <i>p</i> < 0.001). In the thin endometrium group, there was also a statistically significant difference between the endometrial thickness measured before and after PRP (5.85 mm vs 6.65 mm, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The rate of not achieving pregnancy in the RIF group without PRP was found to be significantly greater than that in the control group (53.1% vs 28.7%, <i>p</i> < 0.05). There was no significant difference in pregnancy rates between the PRP groups. Morever, no statistically significant relationship was found between pregnancy status and whether or not PRP was performed in RIF patients (<i>p</i> value > 0.05). Overall, although there was an increase in clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in the PRP group compared with the control group, this difference did not reach statistical significance.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In patients suffering from a thin endometrium or RIF, although endometrial PRP increases endometrial thickness, it does not significantly improve fertility outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":"311 4","pages":"1195 - 1204"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00404-025-07948-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of endometrial PRP on fertility outcomes in women with implantation failure or thin endometrium\",\"authors\":\"Naziye Gurkan, Tayfun Alper\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00404-025-07948-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the effect of intrauterine platelet-rich plasma (PRP) treatment on frozen–thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles in patients with recurrent implantation failure.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The study group consisted of 150 patients. The patients were grouped only as those with thin endometria, those with recurrent implantation failure (RIF), and those with both thin endometria and RIF. All participants underwent frozen embryo transfer. The control group consisted of a total of 150 patients who had normal endometrial thickness and did not have a history of RIF and who presented to the clinic due to unexplained infertility. The rates of biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage and live birth were compared among the groups in terms of fertility outcomes.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>In 150 patients with a thin endometrium or a history of RIF who underwent PRP, the endometrial thickness was significantly greater than the pre-PRP endometrial thickness, and this value was found to be statistically significant (7.38 mm vs. 7.96 mm, <i>p</i> < 0.001). In the thin endometrium group, there was also a statistically significant difference between the endometrial thickness measured before and after PRP (5.85 mm vs 6.65 mm, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The rate of not achieving pregnancy in the RIF group without PRP was found to be significantly greater than that in the control group (53.1% vs 28.7%, <i>p</i> < 0.05). There was no significant difference in pregnancy rates between the PRP groups. Morever, no statistically significant relationship was found between pregnancy status and whether or not PRP was performed in RIF patients (<i>p</i> value > 0.05). Overall, although there was an increase in clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in the PRP group compared with the control group, this difference did not reach statistical significance.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In patients suffering from a thin endometrium or RIF, although endometrial PRP increases endometrial thickness, it does not significantly improve fertility outcomes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"volume\":\"311 4\",\"pages\":\"1195 - 1204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00404-025-07948-1.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00404-025-07948-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00404-025-07948-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨子宫内富血小板血浆(PRP)治疗对反复着床失败患者冻融胚胎移植(FET)周期的影响。材料与方法:研究组150例。将患者分为薄子宫内膜、复发性着床失败(RIF)和同时存在薄子宫内膜和RIF的患者。所有参与者都进行了冷冻胚胎移植。对照组由150名子宫内膜厚度正常、无RIF病史、因不明原因不孕而就诊的患者组成。比较各组生育结局的生化妊娠率、临床妊娠率、流产率和活产率。结果:150例子宫内膜薄或有RIF病史的患者行PRP后,子宫内膜厚度明显大于PRP前的子宫内膜厚度,该值有统计学意义(7.38 mm vs. 7.96 mm, p 0.05)。总体而言,虽然PRP组的临床妊娠率和活产率较对照组有所增加,但差异未达到统计学意义。结论:在子宫内膜薄或RIF患者中,虽然子宫内膜PRP增加了子宫内膜厚度,但并未显著改善生育结果。
The effect of endometrial PRP on fertility outcomes in women with implantation failure or thin endometrium
Objective
To evaluate the effect of intrauterine platelet-rich plasma (PRP) treatment on frozen–thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles in patients with recurrent implantation failure.
Materials and methods
The study group consisted of 150 patients. The patients were grouped only as those with thin endometria, those with recurrent implantation failure (RIF), and those with both thin endometria and RIF. All participants underwent frozen embryo transfer. The control group consisted of a total of 150 patients who had normal endometrial thickness and did not have a history of RIF and who presented to the clinic due to unexplained infertility. The rates of biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage and live birth were compared among the groups in terms of fertility outcomes.
Results
In 150 patients with a thin endometrium or a history of RIF who underwent PRP, the endometrial thickness was significantly greater than the pre-PRP endometrial thickness, and this value was found to be statistically significant (7.38 mm vs. 7.96 mm, p < 0.001). In the thin endometrium group, there was also a statistically significant difference between the endometrial thickness measured before and after PRP (5.85 mm vs 6.65 mm, p < 0.001). The rate of not achieving pregnancy in the RIF group without PRP was found to be significantly greater than that in the control group (53.1% vs 28.7%, p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in pregnancy rates between the PRP groups. Morever, no statistically significant relationship was found between pregnancy status and whether or not PRP was performed in RIF patients (p value > 0.05). Overall, although there was an increase in clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in the PRP group compared with the control group, this difference did not reach statistical significance.
Conclusion
In patients suffering from a thin endometrium or RIF, although endometrial PRP increases endometrial thickness, it does not significantly improve fertility outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report".
The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.