评价创伤患者混合检测模型的模糊决策框架

IF 2.3 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Expert Systems Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1111/exsy.70005
Rula A. Hamid, Idrees A. Zahid, A. S. Albahri, O. S. Albahri, A. H. Alamoodi, Laith Alzubaidi, Iman Mohamad Sharaf, Shahad Sabbar Joudar, YuanTong Gu, Z. T. Al-qaysi
{"title":"评价创伤患者混合检测模型的模糊决策框架","authors":"Rula A. Hamid,&nbsp;Idrees A. Zahid,&nbsp;A. S. Albahri,&nbsp;O. S. Albahri,&nbsp;A. H. Alamoodi,&nbsp;Laith Alzubaidi,&nbsp;Iman Mohamad Sharaf,&nbsp;Shahad Sabbar Joudar,&nbsp;YuanTong Gu,&nbsp;Z. T. Al-qaysi","doi":"10.1111/exsy.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study introduces a new multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework to evaluate trauma injury detection models in intensive care units (ICUs). This research addresses the challenges associated with diverse machine learning (ML) models, inconsistencies, conflicting priorities, and the importance of metrics. The developed methodology consists of three phases: dataset identification and pre-processing, hybrid model development, and an evaluation/benchmarking framework. Through meticulous pre-processing, the dataset is tailored to focus on adult trauma patients. Forty hybrid models were developed by combining eight ML algorithms with four filter-based feature-selection methods and principal component analysis (PCA) as a dimensionality reduction method, and these models were evaluated using seven metrics. The weight coefficients for these metrics are determined using the 2-tuple Linguistic Fermatean Fuzzy-Weighted Zero-Inconsistency (2TLF-FWZIC) method. The <i>Vlsekriterijumska Optimizcija I Kompromisno Resenje</i> (VIKOR) approach is applied to rank the developed models. According to 2TLF-FWZIC, classification accuracy (CA) and precision obtained the highest importance weights of 0.2439 and 0.1805, respectively, while F1, training time, and test time obtained the lowest weights of 0.1055, 0.0886, and 0.1111, respectively. The benchmarking results revealed the following top-performing models: the Gini index with logistic regression (GI-LR), the Gini index with a decision tree (GI_DT), and the information gain with a decision tree (IG_DT), with VIKOR Q score values of 0.016435, 0.023804, and 0.042077, respectively. The proposed MCDM framework is assessed and examined using systematic ranking, sensitivity analysis, validation of the best-selected model using two unseen trauma datasets, and mode explainability using the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method. We benchmarked the proposed methodology against three other benchmark studies and achieved a score of 100% across six key areas. The proposed methodology provides several insights into the empirical synthesis of this study. It contributes to advancing medical informatics by enhancing the understanding and selection of trauma injury detection models for ICUs.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51053,"journal":{"name":"Expert Systems","volume":"42 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fuzzy Decision-Making Framework for Evaluating Hybrid Detection Models of Trauma Patients\",\"authors\":\"Rula A. Hamid,&nbsp;Idrees A. Zahid,&nbsp;A. S. Albahri,&nbsp;O. S. Albahri,&nbsp;A. H. Alamoodi,&nbsp;Laith Alzubaidi,&nbsp;Iman Mohamad Sharaf,&nbsp;Shahad Sabbar Joudar,&nbsp;YuanTong Gu,&nbsp;Z. T. Al-qaysi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/exsy.70005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This study introduces a new multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework to evaluate trauma injury detection models in intensive care units (ICUs). This research addresses the challenges associated with diverse machine learning (ML) models, inconsistencies, conflicting priorities, and the importance of metrics. The developed methodology consists of three phases: dataset identification and pre-processing, hybrid model development, and an evaluation/benchmarking framework. Through meticulous pre-processing, the dataset is tailored to focus on adult trauma patients. Forty hybrid models were developed by combining eight ML algorithms with four filter-based feature-selection methods and principal component analysis (PCA) as a dimensionality reduction method, and these models were evaluated using seven metrics. The weight coefficients for these metrics are determined using the 2-tuple Linguistic Fermatean Fuzzy-Weighted Zero-Inconsistency (2TLF-FWZIC) method. The <i>Vlsekriterijumska Optimizcija I Kompromisno Resenje</i> (VIKOR) approach is applied to rank the developed models. According to 2TLF-FWZIC, classification accuracy (CA) and precision obtained the highest importance weights of 0.2439 and 0.1805, respectively, while F1, training time, and test time obtained the lowest weights of 0.1055, 0.0886, and 0.1111, respectively. The benchmarking results revealed the following top-performing models: the Gini index with logistic regression (GI-LR), the Gini index with a decision tree (GI_DT), and the information gain with a decision tree (IG_DT), with VIKOR Q score values of 0.016435, 0.023804, and 0.042077, respectively. The proposed MCDM framework is assessed and examined using systematic ranking, sensitivity analysis, validation of the best-selected model using two unseen trauma datasets, and mode explainability using the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method. We benchmarked the proposed methodology against three other benchmark studies and achieved a score of 100% across six key areas. The proposed methodology provides several insights into the empirical synthesis of this study. It contributes to advancing medical informatics by enhancing the understanding and selection of trauma injury detection models for ICUs.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Systems\",\"volume\":\"42 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/exsy.70005\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/exsy.70005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究引入了一个新的多标准决策(MCDM)框架来评估重症监护病房(icu)的创伤损伤检测模型。本研究解决了与不同机器学习(ML)模型、不一致性、冲突的优先级和度量的重要性相关的挑战。开发的方法包括三个阶段:数据集识别和预处理、混合模型开发和评估/基准框架。通过细致的预处理,该数据集针对成人创伤患者量身定制。将8种机器学习算法与4种基于滤波器的特征选择方法和主成分分析(PCA)作为降维方法相结合,建立了40个混合模型,并使用7个指标对这些模型进行了评估。这些指标的权重系数是使用二元语言费马模糊加权零不一致(2TLF-FWZIC)方法确定的。采用Vlsekriterijumska Optimizcija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR)方法对已开发的模型进行排序。根据2TLF-FWZIC,分类精度(CA)和精度的重要度权重最高,分别为0.2439和0.1805,F1、训练时间和测试时间的重要度权重最低,分别为0.1055、0.0886和0.1111。基准测试结果显示,以下模型表现最佳:逻辑回归的基尼指数(GI-LR)、决策树的基尼指数(GI_DT)和决策树的信息增益(IG_DT),其VIKOR Q得分分别为0.016435、0.023804和0.042077。采用系统排序、敏感性分析、使用两个未见过的创伤数据集对最佳选择模型进行验证,以及使用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)方法对模式的可解释性进行评估和检查。我们将建议的方法与其他三个基准研究进行了基准测试,并在六个关键领域获得了100%的分数。所提出的方法为本研究的实证综合提供了一些见解。通过加强对icu创伤损伤检测模型的理解和选择,有助于推进医学信息学的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fuzzy Decision-Making Framework for Evaluating Hybrid Detection Models of Trauma Patients

This study introduces a new multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework to evaluate trauma injury detection models in intensive care units (ICUs). This research addresses the challenges associated with diverse machine learning (ML) models, inconsistencies, conflicting priorities, and the importance of metrics. The developed methodology consists of three phases: dataset identification and pre-processing, hybrid model development, and an evaluation/benchmarking framework. Through meticulous pre-processing, the dataset is tailored to focus on adult trauma patients. Forty hybrid models were developed by combining eight ML algorithms with four filter-based feature-selection methods and principal component analysis (PCA) as a dimensionality reduction method, and these models were evaluated using seven metrics. The weight coefficients for these metrics are determined using the 2-tuple Linguistic Fermatean Fuzzy-Weighted Zero-Inconsistency (2TLF-FWZIC) method. The Vlsekriterijumska Optimizcija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) approach is applied to rank the developed models. According to 2TLF-FWZIC, classification accuracy (CA) and precision obtained the highest importance weights of 0.2439 and 0.1805, respectively, while F1, training time, and test time obtained the lowest weights of 0.1055, 0.0886, and 0.1111, respectively. The benchmarking results revealed the following top-performing models: the Gini index with logistic regression (GI-LR), the Gini index with a decision tree (GI_DT), and the information gain with a decision tree (IG_DT), with VIKOR Q score values of 0.016435, 0.023804, and 0.042077, respectively. The proposed MCDM framework is assessed and examined using systematic ranking, sensitivity analysis, validation of the best-selected model using two unseen trauma datasets, and mode explainability using the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method. We benchmarked the proposed methodology against three other benchmark studies and achieved a score of 100% across six key areas. The proposed methodology provides several insights into the empirical synthesis of this study. It contributes to advancing medical informatics by enhancing the understanding and selection of trauma injury detection models for ICUs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Systems
Expert Systems 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
266
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Expert Systems: The Journal of Knowledge Engineering publishes papers dealing with all aspects of knowledge engineering, including individual methods and techniques in knowledge acquisition and representation, and their application in the construction of systems – including expert systems – based thereon. Detailed scientific evaluation is an essential part of any paper. As well as traditional application areas, such as Software and Requirements Engineering, Human-Computer Interaction, and Artificial Intelligence, we are aiming at the new and growing markets for these technologies, such as Business, Economy, Market Research, and Medical and Health Care. The shift towards this new focus will be marked by a series of special issues covering hot and emergent topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信