公众投票选择旅游和保护的旗舰物种——秘鲁亚马逊的“五大”物种?

IF 2.3 2区 生物学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Maribel Recharte, Phyllis C. Lee, Sarah-Jane Vick, Mark Bowler
{"title":"公众投票选择旅游和保护的旗舰物种——秘鲁亚马逊的“五大”物种?","authors":"Maribel Recharte,&nbsp;Phyllis C. Lee,&nbsp;Sarah-Jane Vick,&nbsp;Mark Bowler","doi":"10.1002/ece3.70983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Flagship species are used to promote conservation and tourism. Africa's famous ‘<i>Big five</i>’ have become marketing flagships that fundraisers and tourism promoters emulate globally. Species can be selected systematically for marketing using characteristics such as colour, size or behaviour, but this approach can overlook unique animals or homogenise selections. Alternatively, polling the public can reveal existing preferences for animals directly. We used questionnaires with tourists in the Peruvian Amazon to identify existing biases for species and rank them for suitability for tourism and conservation marketing. Polling revealed several species that would not be considered good flagship candidates using systematic methods based on species characteristics. ‘Free listing’ tourists expressed preferences at inconsistent taxonomic levels. The response ‘monkeys’ (infraorder Simiiformes) was highest ranked, followed by ‘jaguar’ (<i>Panthera onca</i>), ‘Amazon dolphin’ (<i>Inia geoffrensis</i>), ‘sloths’ (suborder Folivora), and ‘caiman’ (subfamily Caimaninae) and ‘birds’ (class Aves). When ranking from a preselected shortlist, jaguar, Amazon dolphins and sloths (represented by <i>Bradypus variegatus</i>) remained popular, while vote splitting within higher taxonomic levels, in particular monkeys, made room for green-winged macaw (<i>Ara chloropterus</i>) and anaconda (<i>Eunectes murinus</i>). When asked about their willingness to pay for excursions or donate to conservation, tourists were overwhelmingly more likely to quote larger figures for jaguars than any other species, but results for other species were more homogenous. Some popular taxonomic groups are diverse in Amazonia; up to 14 monkey species may be present at some sites Amazonia, alongside several hundred bird species. A <i>Big five</i> strategy obscures this diversity. Using physical characteristics as selection criteria underplays diversity and overlooks popular taxa—notably sloths for the Amazon. A strategy of polling the public to select popular species as flagships more directly identifies salient species for marketing and efficiently considers existing biases. However, diversity will trump a <i>Big five</i> approach in megadiverse areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":11467,"journal":{"name":"Ecology and Evolution","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ece3.70983","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Polling the Public to Select Flagship Species for Tourism and Conservation—A ‘Big Five’ for the Peruvian Amazon?\",\"authors\":\"Maribel Recharte,&nbsp;Phyllis C. Lee,&nbsp;Sarah-Jane Vick,&nbsp;Mark Bowler\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ece3.70983\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Flagship species are used to promote conservation and tourism. Africa's famous ‘<i>Big five</i>’ have become marketing flagships that fundraisers and tourism promoters emulate globally. Species can be selected systematically for marketing using characteristics such as colour, size or behaviour, but this approach can overlook unique animals or homogenise selections. Alternatively, polling the public can reveal existing preferences for animals directly. We used questionnaires with tourists in the Peruvian Amazon to identify existing biases for species and rank them for suitability for tourism and conservation marketing. Polling revealed several species that would not be considered good flagship candidates using systematic methods based on species characteristics. ‘Free listing’ tourists expressed preferences at inconsistent taxonomic levels. The response ‘monkeys’ (infraorder Simiiformes) was highest ranked, followed by ‘jaguar’ (<i>Panthera onca</i>), ‘Amazon dolphin’ (<i>Inia geoffrensis</i>), ‘sloths’ (suborder Folivora), and ‘caiman’ (subfamily Caimaninae) and ‘birds’ (class Aves). When ranking from a preselected shortlist, jaguar, Amazon dolphins and sloths (represented by <i>Bradypus variegatus</i>) remained popular, while vote splitting within higher taxonomic levels, in particular monkeys, made room for green-winged macaw (<i>Ara chloropterus</i>) and anaconda (<i>Eunectes murinus</i>). When asked about their willingness to pay for excursions or donate to conservation, tourists were overwhelmingly more likely to quote larger figures for jaguars than any other species, but results for other species were more homogenous. Some popular taxonomic groups are diverse in Amazonia; up to 14 monkey species may be present at some sites Amazonia, alongside several hundred bird species. A <i>Big five</i> strategy obscures this diversity. Using physical characteristics as selection criteria underplays diversity and overlooks popular taxa—notably sloths for the Amazon. A strategy of polling the public to select popular species as flagships more directly identifies salient species for marketing and efficiently considers existing biases. However, diversity will trump a <i>Big five</i> approach in megadiverse areas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecology and Evolution\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ece3.70983\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecology and Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.70983\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.70983","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

旗舰物种被用来促进保护和旅游业。非洲著名的“五大”已经成为全球筹款者和旅游推动者效仿的营销旗舰。可以利用颜色、大小或行为等特征系统地选择物种进行营销,但这种方法可能忽略了独特的动物或同质化的选择。另外,民意调查可以直接揭示公众对动物的现有偏好。我们对秘鲁亚马逊地区的游客进行了问卷调查,以确定现有的物种偏见,并根据旅游和保护营销的适宜性对它们进行排名。通过基于物种特征的系统方法,民意调查显示有几个物种不会被认为是好的旗舰候选者。“免费列表”的游客在不一致的分类水平上表达了偏好。“猴子”(次类人目)排名最高,其次是“美洲虎”(Panthera onca)、“亚马逊海豚”(Inia geoffrensis)、“树懒”(Folivora亚目)、“凯门鳄”(凯门亚科)和“鸟类”(鸟类)。在预选的候选名单中,美洲虎、亚马逊海豚和树懒(以斑尾拖猴为代表)仍然很受欢迎,而在更高的分类等级中,尤其是猴子,投票给了绿翼金刚鹦鹉(Ara chloropterus)和水蟒(Eunectes murinus)。当被问及他们是否愿意为短途旅行付费或为保护活动捐款时,游客们压倒性地更有可能引用美洲虎比其他物种更大的数字,但其他物种的结果则更为相似。一些流行的分类类群在亚马逊地区是多样化的;在亚马逊的一些地方可能有多达14种猴子,以及数百种鸟类。“五大战略”掩盖了这种多样性。用身体特征作为选择标准低估了物种的多样性,也忽视了常见的物种——尤其是亚马逊的树懒。一种让公众投票选择受欢迎的物种作为旗舰的策略更直接地确定了营销的突出物种,并有效地考虑了现有的偏见。然而,在超级多样化的地区,多样性将胜过五大方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Polling the Public to Select Flagship Species for Tourism and Conservation—A ‘Big Five’ for the Peruvian Amazon?

Polling the Public to Select Flagship Species for Tourism and Conservation—A ‘Big Five’ for the Peruvian Amazon?

Flagship species are used to promote conservation and tourism. Africa's famous ‘Big five’ have become marketing flagships that fundraisers and tourism promoters emulate globally. Species can be selected systematically for marketing using characteristics such as colour, size or behaviour, but this approach can overlook unique animals or homogenise selections. Alternatively, polling the public can reveal existing preferences for animals directly. We used questionnaires with tourists in the Peruvian Amazon to identify existing biases for species and rank them for suitability for tourism and conservation marketing. Polling revealed several species that would not be considered good flagship candidates using systematic methods based on species characteristics. ‘Free listing’ tourists expressed preferences at inconsistent taxonomic levels. The response ‘monkeys’ (infraorder Simiiformes) was highest ranked, followed by ‘jaguar’ (Panthera onca), ‘Amazon dolphin’ (Inia geoffrensis), ‘sloths’ (suborder Folivora), and ‘caiman’ (subfamily Caimaninae) and ‘birds’ (class Aves). When ranking from a preselected shortlist, jaguar, Amazon dolphins and sloths (represented by Bradypus variegatus) remained popular, while vote splitting within higher taxonomic levels, in particular monkeys, made room for green-winged macaw (Ara chloropterus) and anaconda (Eunectes murinus). When asked about their willingness to pay for excursions or donate to conservation, tourists were overwhelmingly more likely to quote larger figures for jaguars than any other species, but results for other species were more homogenous. Some popular taxonomic groups are diverse in Amazonia; up to 14 monkey species may be present at some sites Amazonia, alongside several hundred bird species. A Big five strategy obscures this diversity. Using physical characteristics as selection criteria underplays diversity and overlooks popular taxa—notably sloths for the Amazon. A strategy of polling the public to select popular species as flagships more directly identifies salient species for marketing and efficiently considers existing biases. However, diversity will trump a Big five approach in megadiverse areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1027
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Ecology and Evolution is the peer reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of ecology, evolution and conservation science. The journal gives priority to quality research reports, theoretical or empirical, that develop our understanding of organisms and their diversity, interactions between them, and the natural environment. Ecology and Evolution gives prompt and equal consideration to papers reporting theoretical, experimental, applied and descriptive work in terrestrial and aquatic environments. The journal will consider submissions across taxa in areas including but not limited to micro and macro ecological and evolutionary processes, characteristics of and interactions between individuals, populations, communities and the environment, physiological responses to environmental change, population genetics and phylogenetics, relatedness and kin selection, life histories, systematics and taxonomy, conservation genetics, extinction, speciation, adaption, behaviour, biodiversity, species abundance, macroecology, population and ecosystem dynamics, and conservation policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信