厄瓜多尔基多危重病人患压疮风险评估量表的鉴别能力

IF 1.1 Q3 NURSING
F.M. Guerrero-Toapanta MD, MSc, M.J. Sandoval-Cóndor RN, M.T. Usuay-Usuay RN, C.J. Paida-Cañar RN, MSc, E.E. Cuenca-Bermúdes RN
{"title":"厄瓜多尔基多危重病人患压疮风险评估量表的鉴别能力","authors":"F.M. Guerrero-Toapanta MD, MSc,&nbsp;M.J. Sandoval-Cóndor RN,&nbsp;M.T. Usuay-Usuay RN,&nbsp;C.J. Paida-Cañar RN, MSc,&nbsp;E.E. Cuenca-Bermúdes RN","doi":"10.1016/j.enfi.2024.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Pressure ulcers are adverse events that increase morbidity, mortality and costs. Critically ill patients have several risk factors. There are scales that predict their occurrence; however, it is necessary to use specific scales in critically ill patients.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the discriminative ability of the current pressure ulcer risk assessment scale in critically ill patients in Quito, Ecuador.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Observational, longitudinal, prospective study. Patients hospitalized for more than 48<!--> <!-->h without evidence of ulcers on admission were recruited. Demographic and clinical variables were recorded, as well as the current risk assessment scales, Norton, and the appearance of ulcers on a daily basis. Data were analyzed using the JAMOVI® statistical package version 2.4. The significance level was p<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 306 patients were enrolled, and 5 developed ulcers (incidence of 1.63%). Grade II ulcers and sites on the face and head were most common. For the current risk assessment scale, the ROC curve defined the best cut-off point of 13, at 48<!--> <!-->h, Youden index 0.678, sensitivity 100%, specificity 67.77%, positive predictive value 4.9%, negative predictive value 100%, with an AUC of 0.855, with a relative risk of 1.05, with 95% confidence intervals of 1.01-1.10. For Norton, the ROC curve defined the best cut-off point as 9, at 48<!--> <!-->h, Youden index 0.646, sensitivity 64.65%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, negative predictive value 4.55%, AUC 0.874, with a relative risk of 1.04, with 95% confidence intervals of 1.01-1.08.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The current risk assessment scale, similar to the Norton scale, can be used to discriminate the occurrence of pressure ulcers in critically ill patients. The best assessment may be at 48<!--> <!-->h after admission, with a cut-off point of 13.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43993,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria Intensiva","volume":"36 2","pages":"Article 100505"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Capacidad de discriminación de la escala de valoración actual del riesgo de desarrollar úlcera por presión en pacientes críticos de Quito, Ecuador\",\"authors\":\"F.M. Guerrero-Toapanta MD, MSc,&nbsp;M.J. Sandoval-Cóndor RN,&nbsp;M.T. Usuay-Usuay RN,&nbsp;C.J. Paida-Cañar RN, MSc,&nbsp;E.E. Cuenca-Bermúdes RN\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enfi.2024.06.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Pressure ulcers are adverse events that increase morbidity, mortality and costs. Critically ill patients have several risk factors. There are scales that predict their occurrence; however, it is necessary to use specific scales in critically ill patients.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the discriminative ability of the current pressure ulcer risk assessment scale in critically ill patients in Quito, Ecuador.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Observational, longitudinal, prospective study. Patients hospitalized for more than 48<!--> <!-->h without evidence of ulcers on admission were recruited. Demographic and clinical variables were recorded, as well as the current risk assessment scales, Norton, and the appearance of ulcers on a daily basis. Data were analyzed using the JAMOVI® statistical package version 2.4. The significance level was p<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 306 patients were enrolled, and 5 developed ulcers (incidence of 1.63%). Grade II ulcers and sites on the face and head were most common. For the current risk assessment scale, the ROC curve defined the best cut-off point of 13, at 48<!--> <!-->h, Youden index 0.678, sensitivity 100%, specificity 67.77%, positive predictive value 4.9%, negative predictive value 100%, with an AUC of 0.855, with a relative risk of 1.05, with 95% confidence intervals of 1.01-1.10. For Norton, the ROC curve defined the best cut-off point as 9, at 48<!--> <!-->h, Youden index 0.646, sensitivity 64.65%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, negative predictive value 4.55%, AUC 0.874, with a relative risk of 1.04, with 95% confidence intervals of 1.01-1.08.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The current risk assessment scale, similar to the Norton scale, can be used to discriminate the occurrence of pressure ulcers in critically ill patients. The best assessment may be at 48<!--> <!-->h after admission, with a cut-off point of 13.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Enfermeria Intensiva\",\"volume\":\"36 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100505\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Enfermeria Intensiva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130239924000798\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria Intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130239924000798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

压疮是增加发病率、死亡率和成本的不良事件。危重病人有几个危险因素。有一些尺度可以预测它们的发生;但是,危重患者有必要使用特定的量表。目的评价厄瓜多尔基多地区现行压疮风险评估量表对危重患者压疮风险的鉴别能力。方法观察性、纵向、前瞻性研究。患者住院超过48小时,入院时无溃疡的证据。记录了人口统计学和临床变量,以及当前的风险评估量表、诺顿评分和每日溃疡的出现情况。使用JAMOVI®统计软件包2.4版分析数据。显著性水平为p <;0.05.结果共纳入306例患者,其中5例发生溃疡,发生率为1.63%。II级溃疡和面部及头部部位最常见。对于现行的风险评估量表,ROC曲线定义的最佳截断点为13,48 h时,约登指数0.678,敏感性100%,特异性67.77%,阳性预测值4.9%,阴性预测值100%,AUC为0.855,相对风险为1.05,95%可信区间为1.01-1.10。对于Norton, ROC曲线定义的最佳截断点为9,48 h时,约登指数0.646,敏感性64.65%,特异性100%,阳性预测值100%,阴性预测值4.55%,AUC 0.874,相对风险为1.04,95%可信区间为1.01-1.08。结论现有的风险评估量表与诺顿量表类似,可用于区分危重患者压疮的发生。最佳评估可能是在入院后48小时,分界点为13。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Capacidad de discriminación de la escala de valoración actual del riesgo de desarrollar úlcera por presión en pacientes críticos de Quito, Ecuador

Introduction

Pressure ulcers are adverse events that increase morbidity, mortality and costs. Critically ill patients have several risk factors. There are scales that predict their occurrence; however, it is necessary to use specific scales in critically ill patients.

Objective

To evaluate the discriminative ability of the current pressure ulcer risk assessment scale in critically ill patients in Quito, Ecuador.

Method

Observational, longitudinal, prospective study. Patients hospitalized for more than 48 h without evidence of ulcers on admission were recruited. Demographic and clinical variables were recorded, as well as the current risk assessment scales, Norton, and the appearance of ulcers on a daily basis. Data were analyzed using the JAMOVI® statistical package version 2.4. The significance level was p < 0.05.

Results

A total of 306 patients were enrolled, and 5 developed ulcers (incidence of 1.63%). Grade II ulcers and sites on the face and head were most common. For the current risk assessment scale, the ROC curve defined the best cut-off point of 13, at 48 h, Youden index 0.678, sensitivity 100%, specificity 67.77%, positive predictive value 4.9%, negative predictive value 100%, with an AUC of 0.855, with a relative risk of 1.05, with 95% confidence intervals of 1.01-1.10. For Norton, the ROC curve defined the best cut-off point as 9, at 48 h, Youden index 0.646, sensitivity 64.65%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, negative predictive value 4.55%, AUC 0.874, with a relative risk of 1.04, with 95% confidence intervals of 1.01-1.08.

Conclusions

The current risk assessment scale, similar to the Norton scale, can be used to discriminate the occurrence of pressure ulcers in critically ill patients. The best assessment may be at 48 h after admission, with a cut-off point of 13.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
23.10%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Enfermería Intensiva es el medio de comunicación por antonomasia para todos los profesionales de enfermería españoles que desarrollan su actividad profesional en las unidades de cuidados intensivos o en cualquier otro lugar donde se atiende al paciente crítico. Enfermería Intensiva publica cuatro números al año, cuyos temas son específicos para la enfermería de cuidados intensivos. Es la única publicación en español con carácter nacional y está indexada en prestigiosas bases de datos como International Nursing Index, MEDLINE, Índice de Enfermería, Cuiden, Índice Médico Español, Toxline, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信