添加鹰嘴豆小麦面包的感官评价:鹰嘴豆粉发酵的效果

Micaela Parmigiani , Débora Natalia López , Emilce Elina Llopart , Valeria Boeris
{"title":"添加鹰嘴豆小麦面包的感官评价:鹰嘴豆粉发酵的效果","authors":"Micaela Parmigiani ,&nbsp;Débora Natalia López ,&nbsp;Emilce Elina Llopart ,&nbsp;Valeria Boeris","doi":"10.1016/j.foohum.2025.100527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This work examined the effect of kefir fermentation on the sensory characteristics and overall acceptability of composite breads, prepared by partially substituting wheat flour (WF) with chickpea flour (CF). Breads were formulated with WF, CF, or kefir-fermented chickpea flour (KCF) at a 25 % substitution level. A semi-expert panel conducted a descriptive sensory analysis, and untrained consumers performed a hedonic evaluation. The descriptive analysis indicated that both CF and KCF breads had a darker crust and crumb color compared to WF-bread. This was attributed to the inherent color of CF and KCF as well as the enhanced Maillard reactions. KCF-bread had smaller alveoli compared to CF and WF breads whereas the hardness was similar to both CF and WF breads. The fermentation process imparted a slight kefir flavor to the products and reduced the intensity of the characteristic chickpea aroma in KCF-bread but did not significantly affect the chickpea taste. In the hedonic evaluation, the majority of evaluators rated all breads positively, with scores predominantly above 6. The overall acceptability scores revealed that over 75 % of the evaluators rated the three bread samples as being of very good quality. Overall, it was found that kefir fermentation enhances the sensory characteristics of CF-bread, broadening the acceptability of this composite bread. This process may offer a viable approach to increasing legume flour incorporation in bread products while maintaining consumer acceptance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100543,"journal":{"name":"Food and Humanity","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100527"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensory evaluation of wheat bread supplemented with chickpea: The effect of the chickpea flour fermentation\",\"authors\":\"Micaela Parmigiani ,&nbsp;Débora Natalia López ,&nbsp;Emilce Elina Llopart ,&nbsp;Valeria Boeris\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foohum.2025.100527\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This work examined the effect of kefir fermentation on the sensory characteristics and overall acceptability of composite breads, prepared by partially substituting wheat flour (WF) with chickpea flour (CF). Breads were formulated with WF, CF, or kefir-fermented chickpea flour (KCF) at a 25 % substitution level. A semi-expert panel conducted a descriptive sensory analysis, and untrained consumers performed a hedonic evaluation. The descriptive analysis indicated that both CF and KCF breads had a darker crust and crumb color compared to WF-bread. This was attributed to the inherent color of CF and KCF as well as the enhanced Maillard reactions. KCF-bread had smaller alveoli compared to CF and WF breads whereas the hardness was similar to both CF and WF breads. The fermentation process imparted a slight kefir flavor to the products and reduced the intensity of the characteristic chickpea aroma in KCF-bread but did not significantly affect the chickpea taste. In the hedonic evaluation, the majority of evaluators rated all breads positively, with scores predominantly above 6. The overall acceptability scores revealed that over 75 % of the evaluators rated the three bread samples as being of very good quality. Overall, it was found that kefir fermentation enhances the sensory characteristics of CF-bread, broadening the acceptability of this composite bread. This process may offer a viable approach to increasing legume flour incorporation in bread products while maintaining consumer acceptance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food and Humanity\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100527\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food and Humanity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294982442500031X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Humanity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294982442500031X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以鹰嘴豆粉(CF)部分替代小麦粉(WF)制备复合面包,研究了克菲尔发酵对复合面包感官特性和总体可接受性的影响。面包用WF, CF或kefir发酵鹰嘴豆粉(KCF)配制,替代水平为25% %。一个半专家小组进行了描述性的感官分析,未经训练的消费者进行了享乐评价。描述性分析表明,CF和KCF面包的面包皮和面包屑颜色都比wf面包深。这是由于CF和KCF的固有颜色以及美拉德反应的增强。与CF和WF面包相比,kcf面包的肺泡较小,而硬度与CF和WF面包相似。发酵过程使产品具有轻微的开菲尔风味,降低了kcf面包中特有的鹰嘴豆香气的强度,但对鹰嘴豆的味道没有显著影响。在享乐评价中,大多数评价者对所有面包都给予了积极的评价,得分在6分以上。总体可接受性得分显示,超过75% %的评估者认为这三种面包样品的质量非常好。总的来说,发现开菲尔发酵提高了cf面包的感官特性,拓宽了这种复合面包的可接受性。这一过程可能提供一种可行的方法来增加面包产品中豆类面粉的掺入,同时保持消费者的接受度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sensory evaluation of wheat bread supplemented with chickpea: The effect of the chickpea flour fermentation
This work examined the effect of kefir fermentation on the sensory characteristics and overall acceptability of composite breads, prepared by partially substituting wheat flour (WF) with chickpea flour (CF). Breads were formulated with WF, CF, or kefir-fermented chickpea flour (KCF) at a 25 % substitution level. A semi-expert panel conducted a descriptive sensory analysis, and untrained consumers performed a hedonic evaluation. The descriptive analysis indicated that both CF and KCF breads had a darker crust and crumb color compared to WF-bread. This was attributed to the inherent color of CF and KCF as well as the enhanced Maillard reactions. KCF-bread had smaller alveoli compared to CF and WF breads whereas the hardness was similar to both CF and WF breads. The fermentation process imparted a slight kefir flavor to the products and reduced the intensity of the characteristic chickpea aroma in KCF-bread but did not significantly affect the chickpea taste. In the hedonic evaluation, the majority of evaluators rated all breads positively, with scores predominantly above 6. The overall acceptability scores revealed that over 75 % of the evaluators rated the three bread samples as being of very good quality. Overall, it was found that kefir fermentation enhances the sensory characteristics of CF-bread, broadening the acceptability of this composite bread. This process may offer a viable approach to increasing legume flour incorporation in bread products while maintaining consumer acceptance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信