一个综合模型的矛盾心理和威慑旁观者不作为在非法吸毒

IF 8.2 2区管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS

Information & Management Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1016/j.im.2025.104118

Yang-Jun Li , Zhi-Zhi He , Christy M.K. Cheung , Xiao-Liang Shen , Matthew K.O. Lee

{"title":"一个综合模型的矛盾心理和威慑旁观者不作为在非法吸毒","authors":"Yang-Jun Li , Zhi-Zhi He , Christy M.K. Cheung , Xiao-Liang Shen , Matthew K.O. Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.im.2025.104118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Our study seeks to explain bystander inaction by guiding the regulation of delegitimizing doxing. We develop a contextualized research model by integrating attitudinal ambivalence theory and general deterrence theory. Our results innovatively uncover three congruence effects describing how positive and negative appraisals are combined to determine bystander inaction. Moreover, perceived SNS deterrence weakens the negative impact of attitudinal univalence on bystander inaction. As one of the pioneering empirical inquiries into delegitimizing doxing, our study contributes to theory and practice related to bystander intervention in delegitimizing doxing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56291,"journal":{"name":"Information & Management","volume":"62 3","pages":"Article 104118"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An integrated model of ambivalence and deterrence of bystander inaction in delegitimizing doxing\",\"authors\":\"Yang-Jun Li , Zhi-Zhi He , Christy M.K. Cheung , Xiao-Liang Shen , Matthew K.O. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.im.2025.104118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Our study seeks to explain bystander inaction by guiding the regulation of delegitimizing doxing. We develop a contextualized research model by integrating attitudinal ambivalence theory and general deterrence theory. Our results innovatively uncover three congruence effects describing how positive and negative appraisals are combined to determine bystander inaction. Moreover, perceived SNS deterrence weakens the negative impact of attitudinal univalence on bystander inaction. As one of the pioneering empirical inquiries into delegitimizing doxing, our study contributes to theory and practice related to bystander intervention in delegitimizing doxing.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information & Management\",\"volume\":\"62 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 104118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378720625000217\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information & Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378720625000217","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的研究试图通过指导对非法交易的监管来解释旁观者的不作为。我们将态度矛盾心理理论与一般威慑理论相结合，建立了情境化的研究模型。我们的研究结果创新性地揭示了三种一致性效应，描述了积极和消极评价是如何结合起来决定旁观者不作为的。此外，感知SNS威慑减弱了态度一元性对旁观者不作为的负向影响。作为一项开创性的实证研究，我们的研究有助于研究旁观者干预非法性行为的理论和实践。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

An integrated model of ambivalence and deterrence of bystander inaction in delegitimizing doxing

Our study seeks to explain bystander inaction by guiding the regulation of delegitimizing doxing. We develop a contextualized research model by integrating attitudinal ambivalence theory and general deterrence theory. Our results innovatively uncover three congruence effects describing how positive and negative appraisals are combined to determine bystander inaction. Moreover, perceived SNS deterrence weakens the negative impact of attitudinal univalence on bystander inaction. As one of the pioneering empirical inquiries into delegitimizing doxing, our study contributes to theory and practice related to bystander intervention in delegitimizing doxing.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Information & Management 工程技术-计算机：信息系统

CiteScore

17.90

自引率

6.10%

发文量

123

审稿时长

1 months

期刊介绍： Information & Management is a publication that caters to researchers in the field of information systems as well as managers, professionals, administrators, and senior executives involved in designing, implementing, and managing Information Systems Applications.