便携式x射线荧光与土壤磁强计结合作为区分不同污染源的有效工具

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Tadeusz Magiera, Marcin Szuszkiewicz
{"title":"便携式x射线荧光与土壤磁强计结合作为区分不同污染源的有效工具","authors":"Tadeusz Magiera,&nbsp;Marcin Szuszkiewicz","doi":"10.1002/ldr.5515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>To improve the efficiency of soil management and the identification of polluted areas to apply joint measurement technique including soil magnetometry (following the ISO 21226:2019 standard) and portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (pXRF). The measurements were conducted in two forest areas of the Silesian region (South Poland) with similar geological background, soil types and geomorphology, affected by different pollution sources. The results obtained using three pXRF measurements procedures (field measurement, laboratory measurement of fresh and dry samples) were verified in a chemical laboratory (ICP-OES technique with <i>aqua regia</i>). Based on the results, the most reliable values were obtained when using air-dried, sieved and homogenised soil samples. Field measurements were characterised by low measurement repeatability because of the heterogeneity of the measured soil surface (high porosity, variable granulation, high content of organic matter) and the high litter moisture. When determining the concentration levels of Co, Mn, Pb, V and Zn in dry samples, the values measured by pXRF were comparable to those obtained via ICP-OES. In the case of As, the average values were 50% higher than those determined via ICP-OES, whereas the Cr and Ni concentrations were underestimated. The Spearman's rank correlation between magnetic susceptibility and the concentrations of Pb, Zn, As (rs = 0.84, 0.88, 0.85, respectively) as well as the pollution load index (PLI), were sufficiently high to apply the soil magnetometry method on both tested sites. However, in the site affected by magnetic particles from one dominant pollution source, the correlation values were significantly higher than those in the site with overlapping emission sources (urban and industrial sources).</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":203,"journal":{"name":"Land Degradation & Development","volume":"36 8","pages":"2543-2556"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combination of Portable X-Ray Fluorescence With Soil Magnetometry as an Effective Tool for Distinguish Different Pollution Sources\",\"authors\":\"Tadeusz Magiera,&nbsp;Marcin Szuszkiewicz\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ldr.5515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>To improve the efficiency of soil management and the identification of polluted areas to apply joint measurement technique including soil magnetometry (following the ISO 21226:2019 standard) and portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (pXRF). The measurements were conducted in two forest areas of the Silesian region (South Poland) with similar geological background, soil types and geomorphology, affected by different pollution sources. The results obtained using three pXRF measurements procedures (field measurement, laboratory measurement of fresh and dry samples) were verified in a chemical laboratory (ICP-OES technique with <i>aqua regia</i>). Based on the results, the most reliable values were obtained when using air-dried, sieved and homogenised soil samples. Field measurements were characterised by low measurement repeatability because of the heterogeneity of the measured soil surface (high porosity, variable granulation, high content of organic matter) and the high litter moisture. When determining the concentration levels of Co, Mn, Pb, V and Zn in dry samples, the values measured by pXRF were comparable to those obtained via ICP-OES. In the case of As, the average values were 50% higher than those determined via ICP-OES, whereas the Cr and Ni concentrations were underestimated. The Spearman's rank correlation between magnetic susceptibility and the concentrations of Pb, Zn, As (rs = 0.84, 0.88, 0.85, respectively) as well as the pollution load index (PLI), were sufficiently high to apply the soil magnetometry method on both tested sites. However, in the site affected by magnetic particles from one dominant pollution source, the correlation values were significantly higher than those in the site with overlapping emission sources (urban and industrial sources).</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Land Degradation & Development\",\"volume\":\"36 8\",\"pages\":\"2543-2556\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Land Degradation & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ldr.5515\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Degradation & Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ldr.5515","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了提高土壤管理效率和污染区域的识别,应用包括土壤磁强计(遵循ISO 21226:2019标准)和便携式x射线荧光光谱(pXRF)在内的联合测量技术。测量是在西里西亚地区(波兰南部)的两个森林地区进行的,它们具有相似的地质背景、土壤类型和地貌,受到不同污染源的影响。使用三个pXRF测量程序(现场测量,新鲜和干燥样品的实验室测量)获得的结果在化学实验室(ICP-OES技术与王水)进行验证。根据结果,在使用风干、筛分和均质土壤样品时获得了最可靠的值。野外测量的特点是测量重复性低,因为测量土壤表面的异质性(高孔隙率,可变颗粒,高有机质含量)和高凋落物水分。在测定干燥样品中Co, Mn, Pb, V和Zn的浓度水平时,pXRF测量值与ICP-OES测量值相当。As的平均值比ICP-OES测定值高50%,而Cr和Ni的浓度被低估。土壤磁化率与Pb、Zn、As浓度(rs分别为0.84、0.88、0.85)及污染负荷指数(PLI)的Spearman秩相关系数均足够高,可以在两个试验点应用土壤磁强法。而受单一主导污染源磁粉影响的站点,其相关值显著高于有重叠排放源(城市和工业源)的站点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combination of Portable X-Ray Fluorescence With Soil Magnetometry as an Effective Tool for Distinguish Different Pollution Sources

To improve the efficiency of soil management and the identification of polluted areas to apply joint measurement technique including soil magnetometry (following the ISO 21226:2019 standard) and portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (pXRF). The measurements were conducted in two forest areas of the Silesian region (South Poland) with similar geological background, soil types and geomorphology, affected by different pollution sources. The results obtained using three pXRF measurements procedures (field measurement, laboratory measurement of fresh and dry samples) were verified in a chemical laboratory (ICP-OES technique with aqua regia). Based on the results, the most reliable values were obtained when using air-dried, sieved and homogenised soil samples. Field measurements were characterised by low measurement repeatability because of the heterogeneity of the measured soil surface (high porosity, variable granulation, high content of organic matter) and the high litter moisture. When determining the concentration levels of Co, Mn, Pb, V and Zn in dry samples, the values measured by pXRF were comparable to those obtained via ICP-OES. In the case of As, the average values were 50% higher than those determined via ICP-OES, whereas the Cr and Ni concentrations were underestimated. The Spearman's rank correlation between magnetic susceptibility and the concentrations of Pb, Zn, As (rs = 0.84, 0.88, 0.85, respectively) as well as the pollution load index (PLI), were sufficiently high to apply the soil magnetometry method on both tested sites. However, in the site affected by magnetic particles from one dominant pollution source, the correlation values were significantly higher than those in the site with overlapping emission sources (urban and industrial sources).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Land Degradation & Development
Land Degradation & Development 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
5.5 months
期刊介绍: Land Degradation & Development is an international journal which seeks to promote rational study of the recognition, monitoring, control and rehabilitation of degradation in terrestrial environments. The journal focuses on: - what land degradation is; - what causes land degradation; - the impacts of land degradation - the scale of land degradation; - the history, current status or future trends of land degradation; - avoidance, mitigation and control of land degradation; - remedial actions to rehabilitate or restore degraded land; - sustainable land management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信