纳米颗粒包膜杜仲胶的抗菌效果:系统综述。

Samira Adnan, Abhishek Lal, Maham Muneeb Lone, Jamshed Ahmed, Isma Sajjad, Huma Shareef, Muhammad Sohail Zafar
{"title":"纳米颗粒包膜杜仲胶的抗菌效果:系统综述。","authors":"Samira Adnan, Abhishek Lal, Maham Muneeb Lone, Jamshed Ahmed, Isma Sajjad, Huma Shareef, Muhammad Sohail Zafar","doi":"10.29271/jcpsp.2025.02.213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review aimed to evaluate the use of different nanoparticles for their ability to impart antimicrobial properties to conventionally inert gutta-percha when it is coated with nanoparticles. After registering with PROSPERO (CRD42023420939), the search was conducted using the PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, CINAHL, and Google Scholar with predefined keywords. The research question was constructed on PICO as \"Does gutta-percha coated with various nanoparticles provide antibacterial activity against root canal microbes compared to conventional gutta-percha points?\". A total of five relevant in-vitro studies published in English were included. Nanoparticles used for coating included nanopropolis, silver-curcumin, chitosan, silver, and zinc oxide. Micro-organisms tested comprised of Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida albicans. Higher concentration of nanoparticles and prolonged coating duration resulted in increased antimicrobial activity, irrespective of the type of nanoparticle, as compared to conventional gutta-percha. The highest risk of bias was identified in reporting of blinding, randomisation, sampling techniques, and sample size calculation. Fewer studies, as well as heterogeneity of methodologies and results preclude the recommendation of a specific nanoparticle for coating gutta-percha. Key Words: Antimicrobial efficacy, Endodontics, Gutta-percha, Micro-organisms, Nanoparticles.</p>","PeriodicalId":94116,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","volume":"35 2","pages":"213-220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antimicrobial Efficacy of Nanoparticle-Coated Gutta-Percha: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Samira Adnan, Abhishek Lal, Maham Muneeb Lone, Jamshed Ahmed, Isma Sajjad, Huma Shareef, Muhammad Sohail Zafar\",\"doi\":\"10.29271/jcpsp.2025.02.213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This systematic review aimed to evaluate the use of different nanoparticles for their ability to impart antimicrobial properties to conventionally inert gutta-percha when it is coated with nanoparticles. After registering with PROSPERO (CRD42023420939), the search was conducted using the PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, CINAHL, and Google Scholar with predefined keywords. The research question was constructed on PICO as \\\"Does gutta-percha coated with various nanoparticles provide antibacterial activity against root canal microbes compared to conventional gutta-percha points?\\\". A total of five relevant in-vitro studies published in English were included. Nanoparticles used for coating included nanopropolis, silver-curcumin, chitosan, silver, and zinc oxide. Micro-organisms tested comprised of Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida albicans. Higher concentration of nanoparticles and prolonged coating duration resulted in increased antimicrobial activity, irrespective of the type of nanoparticle, as compared to conventional gutta-percha. The highest risk of bias was identified in reporting of blinding, randomisation, sampling techniques, and sample size calculation. Fewer studies, as well as heterogeneity of methodologies and results preclude the recommendation of a specific nanoparticle for coating gutta-percha. Key Words: Antimicrobial efficacy, Endodontics, Gutta-percha, Micro-organisms, Nanoparticles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP\",\"volume\":\"35 2\",\"pages\":\"213-220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2025.02.213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2025.02.213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本系统综述旨在评估不同纳米颗粒在涂有纳米颗粒时赋予传统惰性杜仲胶抗菌性能的能力。在PROSPERO注册(CRD42023420939)后,使用PubMed、Cochrane、Scopus、CINAHL和b谷歌Scholar等预定义关键词进行检索。在PICO上构建的研究问题是“与传统的杜仲胶相比,涂有各种纳米颗粒的杜仲胶是否具有对根管微生物的抗菌活性?”共纳入了5项相关的体外研究。用于涂层的纳米颗粒包括纳米蜂胶、银姜黄素、壳聚糖、银和氧化锌。测试的微生物包括粪肠球菌、大肠杆菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和白色念珠菌。与传统的杜仲胶相比,无论纳米颗粒的类型如何,更高浓度的纳米颗粒和延长的涂层时间都能提高抗菌活性。在盲法、随机化、抽样技术和样本量计算的报告中发现了最高的偏倚风险。较少的研究,以及方法和结果的不均匀性阻碍了推荐用于涂覆杜仲胶的特定纳米颗粒。关键词:抗菌功效,牙髓学,杜仲胶,微生物,纳米颗粒
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antimicrobial Efficacy of Nanoparticle-Coated Gutta-Percha: A Systematic Review.

This systematic review aimed to evaluate the use of different nanoparticles for their ability to impart antimicrobial properties to conventionally inert gutta-percha when it is coated with nanoparticles. After registering with PROSPERO (CRD42023420939), the search was conducted using the PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, CINAHL, and Google Scholar with predefined keywords. The research question was constructed on PICO as "Does gutta-percha coated with various nanoparticles provide antibacterial activity against root canal microbes compared to conventional gutta-percha points?". A total of five relevant in-vitro studies published in English were included. Nanoparticles used for coating included nanopropolis, silver-curcumin, chitosan, silver, and zinc oxide. Micro-organisms tested comprised of Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida albicans. Higher concentration of nanoparticles and prolonged coating duration resulted in increased antimicrobial activity, irrespective of the type of nanoparticle, as compared to conventional gutta-percha. The highest risk of bias was identified in reporting of blinding, randomisation, sampling techniques, and sample size calculation. Fewer studies, as well as heterogeneity of methodologies and results preclude the recommendation of a specific nanoparticle for coating gutta-percha. Key Words: Antimicrobial efficacy, Endodontics, Gutta-percha, Micro-organisms, Nanoparticles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信