纳入进食障碍筛查工具和进食障碍诊断研讨会在门诊普通精神病学设置在公共保险人群的影响:一个案例系列。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Stuart B Murray, Cassandra E Friedlich, Talene Kesheshian
{"title":"纳入进食障碍筛查工具和进食障碍诊断研讨会在门诊普通精神病学设置在公共保险人群的影响:一个案例系列。","authors":"Stuart B Murray, Cassandra E Friedlich, Talene Kesheshian","doi":"10.1080/10640266.2025.2459972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With an elevated prevalence of disordered eating in low-income settings, efforts to optimize the detection of eating disorders (EDs) in such settings are necessary. A significant barrier relates to the scarcity of training for clinicians not working in specialized ED settings. This manuscript assessed the impact of an ED screening tool and an ED assessment workshop upon the detection of EDs in publicly insured psychiatry settings. Leveraging a case series design to assess 165 consecutive adult patients in outpatient psychiatry settings, we indexed the prevalence of ED diagnoses rendered by psychiatrists when assessing patients (i) without prior knowledge of ED symptoms, (ii) after being made aware of patient scores from an ED screening measure, and (iii) after undergoing an ED assessment workshop, and being made aware of patient screening scores. While 27% of the sample reported clinically significant ED symptoms on the screening measure, ED diagnoses were only rendered in 2% of the sample when psychiatrists were not made aware of ED symptoms prior to assessment. In contrast, incorporating a screening tool altered the rates of ED diagnoses, with 18% of the sample receiving an ED diagnosis. Moreover, the combinatorial introduction of both the ED screening measure and an ED assessment workshop further altered diagnostic practice-with this resulting in ED diagnoses in 27% of the sample. The findings suggest that ED screening and training workshops can have significant impacts on diagnostic accuracy and, with little cost, can provide patients with diagnoses that would otherwise go undetected.</p>","PeriodicalId":48835,"journal":{"name":"Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of incorporating an eating disorder screening tool and an eating disorder diagnostic workshop in outpatient general psychiatry settings in publicly insured populations: a case series.\",\"authors\":\"Stuart B Murray, Cassandra E Friedlich, Talene Kesheshian\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10640266.2025.2459972\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>With an elevated prevalence of disordered eating in low-income settings, efforts to optimize the detection of eating disorders (EDs) in such settings are necessary. A significant barrier relates to the scarcity of training for clinicians not working in specialized ED settings. This manuscript assessed the impact of an ED screening tool and an ED assessment workshop upon the detection of EDs in publicly insured psychiatry settings. Leveraging a case series design to assess 165 consecutive adult patients in outpatient psychiatry settings, we indexed the prevalence of ED diagnoses rendered by psychiatrists when assessing patients (i) without prior knowledge of ED symptoms, (ii) after being made aware of patient scores from an ED screening measure, and (iii) after undergoing an ED assessment workshop, and being made aware of patient screening scores. While 27% of the sample reported clinically significant ED symptoms on the screening measure, ED diagnoses were only rendered in 2% of the sample when psychiatrists were not made aware of ED symptoms prior to assessment. In contrast, incorporating a screening tool altered the rates of ED diagnoses, with 18% of the sample receiving an ED diagnosis. Moreover, the combinatorial introduction of both the ED screening measure and an ED assessment workshop further altered diagnostic practice-with this resulting in ED diagnoses in 27% of the sample. The findings suggest that ED screening and training workshops can have significant impacts on diagnostic accuracy and, with little cost, can provide patients with diagnoses that would otherwise go undetected.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eating Disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eating Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2025.2459972\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2025.2459972","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着低收入环境中饮食失调患病率的上升,有必要努力优化这些环境中饮食失调(EDs)的检测。一个重要的障碍是缺乏培训的临床医生不是在专门的急诊科设置工作。这篇手稿评估了ED筛查工具和ED评估研讨会对在公共保险的精神病学设置检测ED的影响。利用病例系列设计对门诊精神病学设置的165名连续成年患者进行评估,我们索引了精神科医生在评估患者时(i)事先不知道ED症状,(ii)在了解ED筛查措施的患者评分后,以及(iii)在经历ED评估研讨会并了解患者筛查评分后做出ED诊断的患病率。虽然27%的样本在筛查措施中报告了临床上显着的ED症状,但当精神科医生在评估前没有意识到ED症状时,ED诊断仅在2%的样本中呈现。相比之下,结合筛查工具改变了ED诊断率,18%的样本接受了ED诊断。此外,ED筛查措施和ED评估研讨会的组合引入进一步改变了诊断实践,这导致27%的样本被诊断为ED。研究结果表明,ED筛查和培训研讨会可以对诊断准确性产生重大影响,并且花费很少,可以为患者提供否则无法被发现的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of incorporating an eating disorder screening tool and an eating disorder diagnostic workshop in outpatient general psychiatry settings in publicly insured populations: a case series.

With an elevated prevalence of disordered eating in low-income settings, efforts to optimize the detection of eating disorders (EDs) in such settings are necessary. A significant barrier relates to the scarcity of training for clinicians not working in specialized ED settings. This manuscript assessed the impact of an ED screening tool and an ED assessment workshop upon the detection of EDs in publicly insured psychiatry settings. Leveraging a case series design to assess 165 consecutive adult patients in outpatient psychiatry settings, we indexed the prevalence of ED diagnoses rendered by psychiatrists when assessing patients (i) without prior knowledge of ED symptoms, (ii) after being made aware of patient scores from an ED screening measure, and (iii) after undergoing an ED assessment workshop, and being made aware of patient screening scores. While 27% of the sample reported clinically significant ED symptoms on the screening measure, ED diagnoses were only rendered in 2% of the sample when psychiatrists were not made aware of ED symptoms prior to assessment. In contrast, incorporating a screening tool altered the rates of ED diagnoses, with 18% of the sample receiving an ED diagnosis. Moreover, the combinatorial introduction of both the ED screening measure and an ED assessment workshop further altered diagnostic practice-with this resulting in ED diagnoses in 27% of the sample. The findings suggest that ED screening and training workshops can have significant impacts on diagnostic accuracy and, with little cost, can provide patients with diagnoses that would otherwise go undetected.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Eating Disorders
Eating Disorders PSYCHIATRY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Eating Disorders is contemporary and wide ranging, and takes a fundamentally practical, humanistic, compassionate view of clients and their presenting problems. You’ll find a multidisciplinary perspective on clinical issues and prevention research that considers the essential cultural, social, familial, and personal elements that not only foster eating-related problems, but also furnish clues that facilitate the most effective possible therapies and treatment approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信