探索澳大利亚痴呆症患者包容性职业治疗的因素:一项定性研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Sally Day, Kate Laver, Kylie Radford, Yun-Hee Jeon, Lee-Fay Low
{"title":"探索澳大利亚痴呆症患者包容性职业治疗的因素:一项定性研究。","authors":"Sally Day, Kate Laver, Kylie Radford, Yun-Hee Jeon, Lee-Fay Low","doi":"10.5014/ajot.2025.050895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Occupational therapy interventions are a crucial part of dementia care and have been shown to be effective in research trials. However, the acceptability and inclusivity of occupational therapy interventions to treat dementia for people from diverse groups are unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore factors contributing to the delivery of acceptable and inclusive community-based occupational therapy interventions for people with dementia from diverse groups in Australia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Exploratory qualitative study in which interviews and focus groups were used. Data were analyzed with reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community-based occupational therapy in Australia.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Purposive sampling was used to recruit 26 participants. Eight people with experience of dementia from diverse groups (ethnic minority, sexual minority, and socially or economically disadvantaged groups) participated in individual interviews; occupational therapists participated in focus groups (n = 10) and interviews (n = 8).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three key themes were developed to support inclusivity: (1) knowing the person at the center of the care, (2) collaboration, and (3) perception of occupational therapy for people with dementia. Acceptable and inclusive occupational therapy interventions for dementia occurred when people from diverse groups felt valued and received tailored interventions, were confident in and partnered with the therapist, and understood the purpose of therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Therapists require support to apply cultural humility and to build skills to overcome barriers to providing culturally safe and acceptable care. Plain-Language Summary: People from diverse groups include ethnic minority, sexual minority, and socially or economically disadvantaged groups as well as Indigenous populations. We know community-based occupational therapy interventions improve function and quality of life for people with dementia and their families, but we do not know whether they work for people from diverse groups. We asked people with experience of dementia from diverse groups and occupational therapists in Australia what they thought. We found that occupational therapy interventions for dementia are acceptable to diverse groups when the therapist works in partnership, providing an intervention that is meaningful to them. To be inclusive, therapists need to empower people from diverse groups to participate equally in the intervention. They need to make sure families understand the purpose of the intervention. Some occupational therapists may need training to build skills and knowledge as well as support to overcome barriers and to provide acceptable and inclusive interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48317,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"79 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Factors for Inclusive Occupational Therapy for People With Dementia in Australia: A Qualitative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sally Day, Kate Laver, Kylie Radford, Yun-Hee Jeon, Lee-Fay Low\",\"doi\":\"10.5014/ajot.2025.050895\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Occupational therapy interventions are a crucial part of dementia care and have been shown to be effective in research trials. However, the acceptability and inclusivity of occupational therapy interventions to treat dementia for people from diverse groups are unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore factors contributing to the delivery of acceptable and inclusive community-based occupational therapy interventions for people with dementia from diverse groups in Australia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Exploratory qualitative study in which interviews and focus groups were used. Data were analyzed with reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community-based occupational therapy in Australia.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Purposive sampling was used to recruit 26 participants. Eight people with experience of dementia from diverse groups (ethnic minority, sexual minority, and socially or economically disadvantaged groups) participated in individual interviews; occupational therapists participated in focus groups (n = 10) and interviews (n = 8).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three key themes were developed to support inclusivity: (1) knowing the person at the center of the care, (2) collaboration, and (3) perception of occupational therapy for people with dementia. Acceptable and inclusive occupational therapy interventions for dementia occurred when people from diverse groups felt valued and received tailored interventions, were confident in and partnered with the therapist, and understood the purpose of therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Therapists require support to apply cultural humility and to build skills to overcome barriers to providing culturally safe and acceptable care. Plain-Language Summary: People from diverse groups include ethnic minority, sexual minority, and socially or economically disadvantaged groups as well as Indigenous populations. We know community-based occupational therapy interventions improve function and quality of life for people with dementia and their families, but we do not know whether they work for people from diverse groups. We asked people with experience of dementia from diverse groups and occupational therapists in Australia what they thought. We found that occupational therapy interventions for dementia are acceptable to diverse groups when the therapist works in partnership, providing an intervention that is meaningful to them. To be inclusive, therapists need to empower people from diverse groups to participate equally in the intervention. They need to make sure families understand the purpose of the intervention. Some occupational therapists may need training to build skills and knowledge as well as support to overcome barriers and to provide acceptable and inclusive interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"volume\":\"79 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2025.050895\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2025.050895","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:职业治疗干预是痴呆症护理的重要组成部分,在研究试验中已被证明是有效的。然而,职业治疗干预对不同群体的痴呆症患者的可接受性和包容性尚不清楚。目的:探讨在澳大利亚为不同群体的痴呆症患者提供可接受和包容的社区职业治疗干预的因素。设计:探索性质的研究,其中使用访谈和焦点小组。数据分析采用自反性主题分析。背景:澳大利亚以社区为基础的职业治疗。参与者:采用有目的抽样法,共招募26名参与者。来自不同群体(少数民族、性少数群体和社会或经济弱势群体)的8名痴呆症患者参加了个别访谈;职业治疗师参加了焦点小组(n = 10)和访谈(n = 8)。结果:开发了三个关键主题来支持包容性:(1)了解护理中心的人,(2)协作,以及(3)认知痴呆症患者的职业治疗。当来自不同群体的人感到受到重视并接受量身定制的干预措施,对治疗师充满信心并与之合作,并了解治疗的目的时,就会出现可接受和包容性的痴呆症职业治疗干预措施。结论和相关性:治疗师需要支持,运用文化谦逊,建立技能,克服障碍,提供文化上安全和可接受的护理。简单的语言总结:来自不同群体的人包括少数民族、性少数群体、社会或经济上处于不利地位的群体以及土著人口。我们知道,以社区为基础的职业治疗干预措施可以改善痴呆症患者及其家人的功能和生活质量,但我们不知道它们是否对不同群体的人有效。我们询问了澳大利亚不同群体和职业治疗师中有痴呆症经验的人的想法。我们发现,当治疗师与不同的群体合作,提供对他们有意义的干预时,对痴呆症的职业治疗干预是可以接受的。为了做到包容,治疗师需要赋予来自不同群体的人平等参与干预的权力。他们需要确保家庭理解干预的目的。一些职业治疗师可能需要培训,以建立技能和知识以及支持,以克服障碍,并提供可接受的和包容性的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring Factors for Inclusive Occupational Therapy for People With Dementia in Australia: A Qualitative Study.

Importance: Occupational therapy interventions are a crucial part of dementia care and have been shown to be effective in research trials. However, the acceptability and inclusivity of occupational therapy interventions to treat dementia for people from diverse groups are unclear.

Objective: To explore factors contributing to the delivery of acceptable and inclusive community-based occupational therapy interventions for people with dementia from diverse groups in Australia.

Design: Exploratory qualitative study in which interviews and focus groups were used. Data were analyzed with reflexive thematic analysis.

Setting: Community-based occupational therapy in Australia.

Participants: Purposive sampling was used to recruit 26 participants. Eight people with experience of dementia from diverse groups (ethnic minority, sexual minority, and socially or economically disadvantaged groups) participated in individual interviews; occupational therapists participated in focus groups (n = 10) and interviews (n = 8).

Results: Three key themes were developed to support inclusivity: (1) knowing the person at the center of the care, (2) collaboration, and (3) perception of occupational therapy for people with dementia. Acceptable and inclusive occupational therapy interventions for dementia occurred when people from diverse groups felt valued and received tailored interventions, were confident in and partnered with the therapist, and understood the purpose of therapy.

Conclusions and relevance: Therapists require support to apply cultural humility and to build skills to overcome barriers to providing culturally safe and acceptable care. Plain-Language Summary: People from diverse groups include ethnic minority, sexual minority, and socially or economically disadvantaged groups as well as Indigenous populations. We know community-based occupational therapy interventions improve function and quality of life for people with dementia and their families, but we do not know whether they work for people from diverse groups. We asked people with experience of dementia from diverse groups and occupational therapists in Australia what they thought. We found that occupational therapy interventions for dementia are acceptable to diverse groups when the therapist works in partnership, providing an intervention that is meaningful to them. To be inclusive, therapists need to empower people from diverse groups to participate equally in the intervention. They need to make sure families understand the purpose of the intervention. Some occupational therapists may need training to build skills and knowledge as well as support to overcome barriers and to provide acceptable and inclusive interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
406
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) is an official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. and is published 6 times per year. This peer reviewed journal focuses on research, practice, and health care issues in the field of occupational therapy. AOTA members receive 6 issues of AJOT per year and have online access to archived abstracts and full-text articles. Nonmembers may view abstracts online but must purchase full-text articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信