一次性评估识别唐氏综合征成人前驱阿尔茨海默病的有效性

IF 4 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sharon J Krinsky-McHale, Cynthia M Kovacs, Joseph H Lee, Tracy A Listwan, Deborah I Pang, Nicole Schupf, Benjamin Tycko, Warren B Zigman, Wayne Silverman
{"title":"一次性评估识别唐氏综合征成人前驱阿尔茨海默病的有效性","authors":"Sharon J Krinsky-McHale, Cynthia M Kovacs, Joseph H Lee, Tracy A Listwan, Deborah I Pang, Nicole Schupf, Benjamin Tycko, Warren B Zigman, Wayne Silverman","doi":"10.1002/dad2.70076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>New Alzheimer's disease (AD) treatments have created an urgent need for accurate early diagnosis of high-risk adults with Down syndrome (DS), distinguishing prodromal DS-AD symptoms from lifelong cognitive impairments. Often, clinicians will need to evaluate dementia status during a single assessment, and here we describe empirically supported methods effective under such circumstances.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Archived data collected between 1987 and 2017 included longitudinal findings for 144 individuals maintaining cognitive stability and 126 developing prodromal DS-AD. Response operating characteristic analyses compared groups, defined by the presence/absence of prodromal DS-AD, for a single assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Groups differed on all measures without adjusting for developmental history, 0.717 < areas under the curve < 0.859, <i>P</i>s < 0.0001. The balance between sensitivity and specificity improved slightly when developmental histories were considered.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The present study demonstrated that one-time assessments can inform clinical judgments when diagnosing adults at risk for DS-AD. Knowledge of developmental history is valuable but non-essential.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Non-overlapping distributions were observed for preclinical and prodromal Alzheimer's disease (AD) groups.Receiver operating characteristic area under the curve analyses were in the acceptable to excellent range for all measures.Performance was sensitive to both the severity of intellectual disability and the stage of Down syndrome-AD progression.Episodic memory tests were sensitive to the transition from preclinical to prodromal AD.Performance results at a single time point can inform dementia status decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":53226,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring","volume":"17 1","pages":"e70076"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11812125/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity of one-time assessments for identifying prodromal Alzheimer's disease in adults with Down syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Sharon J Krinsky-McHale, Cynthia M Kovacs, Joseph H Lee, Tracy A Listwan, Deborah I Pang, Nicole Schupf, Benjamin Tycko, Warren B Zigman, Wayne Silverman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dad2.70076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>New Alzheimer's disease (AD) treatments have created an urgent need for accurate early diagnosis of high-risk adults with Down syndrome (DS), distinguishing prodromal DS-AD symptoms from lifelong cognitive impairments. Often, clinicians will need to evaluate dementia status during a single assessment, and here we describe empirically supported methods effective under such circumstances.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Archived data collected between 1987 and 2017 included longitudinal findings for 144 individuals maintaining cognitive stability and 126 developing prodromal DS-AD. Response operating characteristic analyses compared groups, defined by the presence/absence of prodromal DS-AD, for a single assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Groups differed on all measures without adjusting for developmental history, 0.717 < areas under the curve < 0.859, <i>P</i>s < 0.0001. The balance between sensitivity and specificity improved slightly when developmental histories were considered.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The present study demonstrated that one-time assessments can inform clinical judgments when diagnosing adults at risk for DS-AD. Knowledge of developmental history is valuable but non-essential.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Non-overlapping distributions were observed for preclinical and prodromal Alzheimer's disease (AD) groups.Receiver operating characteristic area under the curve analyses were in the acceptable to excellent range for all measures.Performance was sensitive to both the severity of intellectual disability and the stage of Down syndrome-AD progression.Episodic memory tests were sensitive to the transition from preclinical to prodromal AD.Performance results at a single time point can inform dementia status decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"e70076\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11812125/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.70076\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.70076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新的阿尔茨海默病(AD)治疗方法迫切需要对高危成人唐氏综合征(DS)进行准确的早期诊断,将DS-AD前驱症状与终身认知障碍区分开来。通常,临床医生需要在一次评估中评估痴呆状态,在这里,我们描述了在这种情况下有效的经验支持方法。方法:1987年至2017年收集的存档数据包括144名维持认知稳定的个体和126名发展为前驱DS-AD的个体的纵向研究结果。反应操作特征分析比较各组,由前驱DS-AD的存在/不存在来定义,进行单一评估。讨论:本研究表明,在诊断DS-AD高危成人时,一次性评估可以为临床判断提供依据。发展历史的知识是有价值的,但不是必需的。重点:在临床前和前驱阿尔茨海默病(AD)组中观察到非重叠分布。曲线下的受试者工作特征面积分析在可接受到优秀的范围内。表现对智力残疾的严重程度和唐氏综合征- ad进展的阶段都很敏感。情景记忆测试对从临床前到前驱AD的过渡很敏感。单个时间点的性能结果可以为痴呆症状态的决定提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validity of one-time assessments for identifying prodromal Alzheimer's disease in adults with Down syndrome.

Introduction: New Alzheimer's disease (AD) treatments have created an urgent need for accurate early diagnosis of high-risk adults with Down syndrome (DS), distinguishing prodromal DS-AD symptoms from lifelong cognitive impairments. Often, clinicians will need to evaluate dementia status during a single assessment, and here we describe empirically supported methods effective under such circumstances.

Methods: Archived data collected between 1987 and 2017 included longitudinal findings for 144 individuals maintaining cognitive stability and 126 developing prodromal DS-AD. Response operating characteristic analyses compared groups, defined by the presence/absence of prodromal DS-AD, for a single assessment.

Results: Groups differed on all measures without adjusting for developmental history, 0.717 < areas under the curve < 0.859, Ps < 0.0001. The balance between sensitivity and specificity improved slightly when developmental histories were considered.

Discussion: The present study demonstrated that one-time assessments can inform clinical judgments when diagnosing adults at risk for DS-AD. Knowledge of developmental history is valuable but non-essential.

Highlights: Non-overlapping distributions were observed for preclinical and prodromal Alzheimer's disease (AD) groups.Receiver operating characteristic area under the curve analyses were in the acceptable to excellent range for all measures.Performance was sensitive to both the severity of intellectual disability and the stage of Down syndrome-AD progression.Episodic memory tests were sensitive to the transition from preclinical to prodromal AD.Performance results at a single time point can inform dementia status decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
7.50%
发文量
101
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer''s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring (DADM) is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal from the Alzheimer''s Association® that will publish new research that reports the discovery, development and validation of instruments, technologies, algorithms, and innovative processes. Papers will cover a range of topics interested in the early and accurate detection of individuals with memory complaints and/or among asymptomatic individuals at elevated risk for various forms of memory disorders. The expectation for published papers will be to translate fundamental knowledge about the neurobiology of the disease into practical reports that describe both the conceptual and methodological aspects of the submitted scientific inquiry. Published topics will explore the development of biomarkers, surrogate markers, and conceptual/methodological challenges. Publication priority will be given to papers that 1) describe putative surrogate markers that accurately track disease progression, 2) biomarkers that fulfill international regulatory requirements, 3) reports from large, well-characterized population-based cohorts that comprise the heterogeneity and diversity of asymptomatic individuals and 4) algorithmic development that considers multi-marker arrays (e.g., integrated-omics, genetics, biofluids, imaging, etc.) and advanced computational analytics and technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信