生物制剂与小分子药物治疗2-18岁儿童特应性皮炎的比较疗效:一项为期12-16周的随机对照试验网络meta分析

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Su-Boon Yong, Berne Ting, Ikbal Andrian Malau, Suet-Kei Wu, Xin-Zhi Huang, Jiu-Yao Wang, Li Jingling, Chang-Ching Wei
{"title":"生物制剂与小分子药物治疗2-18岁儿童特应性皮炎的比较疗效:一项为期12-16周的随机对照试验网络meta分析","authors":"Su-Boon Yong, Berne Ting, Ikbal Andrian Malau, Suet-Kei Wu, Xin-Zhi Huang, Jiu-Yao Wang, Li Jingling, Chang-Ching Wei","doi":"10.1111/pai.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atopic dermatitis (AD) predominantly manifests before age five, with significant phenotype variations across age groups. Despite increasing systemic treatments for pediatric AD, head-to-head comparisons in network meta-analyses focused on children are scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Through systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to March 2024, we identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe AD in children aged 2-18 years. From 900 screened articles, 8 RCTs (n = 2636) met inclusion criteria, comparing dupilumab, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and abrocitinib versus placebo with standard care. Primary outcome was Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores at 12-16 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Upadacitinib demonstrated highest efficacy at both 30 mg (risk difference [RD] 0.62 [0.53, 0.71]) and 15 mg (RD 0.52 [0.42, 0.62]). Dupilumab (weight-based dosing with corticosteroids; RD 0.43 [0.29, 0.57]), abrocitinib (200 mg; RD 0.40 [0.29, 0.50]; 100 mg; RD 0.30 [0.20, 0.41]), and baricitinib (4 mg; RD 0.21 [0.06, 0.35]) also showed significant efficacy over placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This analysis establishes a hierarchy of effectiveness among systemic therapies for pediatric AD, with upadacitinib showing highest efficacy. However, the predominance of adolescent data emphasizes the need for age-stratified studies in younger children and long-term safety assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":19929,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Allergy and Immunology","volume":"36 2","pages":"e70045"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative efficacy of biologics and small molecule drugs in treating pediatric atopic dermatitis in patients aged 2-18 years: A 12-16 week network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Su-Boon Yong, Berne Ting, Ikbal Andrian Malau, Suet-Kei Wu, Xin-Zhi Huang, Jiu-Yao Wang, Li Jingling, Chang-Ching Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pai.70045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atopic dermatitis (AD) predominantly manifests before age five, with significant phenotype variations across age groups. Despite increasing systemic treatments for pediatric AD, head-to-head comparisons in network meta-analyses focused on children are scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Through systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to March 2024, we identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe AD in children aged 2-18 years. From 900 screened articles, 8 RCTs (n = 2636) met inclusion criteria, comparing dupilumab, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and abrocitinib versus placebo with standard care. Primary outcome was Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores at 12-16 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Upadacitinib demonstrated highest efficacy at both 30 mg (risk difference [RD] 0.62 [0.53, 0.71]) and 15 mg (RD 0.52 [0.42, 0.62]). Dupilumab (weight-based dosing with corticosteroids; RD 0.43 [0.29, 0.57]), abrocitinib (200 mg; RD 0.40 [0.29, 0.50]; 100 mg; RD 0.30 [0.20, 0.41]), and baricitinib (4 mg; RD 0.21 [0.06, 0.35]) also showed significant efficacy over placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This analysis establishes a hierarchy of effectiveness among systemic therapies for pediatric AD, with upadacitinib showing highest efficacy. However, the predominance of adolescent data emphasizes the need for age-stratified studies in younger children and long-term safety assessments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Allergy and Immunology\",\"volume\":\"36 2\",\"pages\":\"e70045\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Allergy and Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pai.70045\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Allergy and Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pai.70045","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:特应性皮炎(AD)主要表现在5岁之前,不同年龄组的表型差异显著。尽管对儿童AD的系统治疗越来越多,但针对儿童的网络荟萃分析中针锋相对的比较很少。方法:通过系统检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library,检索到截至2024年3月的随机对照试验(rct),评估2-18岁儿童中重度AD的系统治疗。从900篇筛选的文章中,8项rct (n = 2636)符合纳入标准,比较了dupilumab、baricitinib、upadacitinib和abrocitinib与安慰剂的标准治疗。主要结局是湿疹面积和严重程度指数(EASI)评分在12-16周。结果:Upadacitinib在30 mg(风险差[RD] 0.62[0.53, 0.71])和15 mg(风险差[RD] 0.52[0.42, 0.62])时均显示出最高疗效。Dupilumab(基于体重给药的皮质类固醇;RD 0.43[0.29, 0.57]),阿布替尼(200mg;Rd 0.40 [0.29, 0.50];100毫克;RD 0.30 [0.20, 0.41]), baricitinib (4mg;RD(0.21[0.06, 0.35])也比安慰剂有显著的疗效。结论:该分析建立了儿童AD全身治疗的有效性等级,upadacitinib显示出最高的疗效。然而,青少年数据的优势强调了在年幼儿童中进行年龄分层研究和长期安全性评估的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative efficacy of biologics and small molecule drugs in treating pediatric atopic dermatitis in patients aged 2-18 years: A 12-16 week network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) predominantly manifests before age five, with significant phenotype variations across age groups. Despite increasing systemic treatments for pediatric AD, head-to-head comparisons in network meta-analyses focused on children are scarce.

Methods: Through systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to March 2024, we identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe AD in children aged 2-18 years. From 900 screened articles, 8 RCTs (n = 2636) met inclusion criteria, comparing dupilumab, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and abrocitinib versus placebo with standard care. Primary outcome was Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores at 12-16 weeks.

Results: Upadacitinib demonstrated highest efficacy at both 30 mg (risk difference [RD] 0.62 [0.53, 0.71]) and 15 mg (RD 0.52 [0.42, 0.62]). Dupilumab (weight-based dosing with corticosteroids; RD 0.43 [0.29, 0.57]), abrocitinib (200 mg; RD 0.40 [0.29, 0.50]; 100 mg; RD 0.30 [0.20, 0.41]), and baricitinib (4 mg; RD 0.21 [0.06, 0.35]) also showed significant efficacy over placebo.

Conclusion: This analysis establishes a hierarchy of effectiveness among systemic therapies for pediatric AD, with upadacitinib showing highest efficacy. However, the predominance of adolescent data emphasizes the need for age-stratified studies in younger children and long-term safety assessments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Allergy and Immunology is the world''s leading journal in pediatric allergy, publishing original contributions and comprehensive reviews related to the understanding and treatment of immune deficiency and allergic inflammatory and infectious diseases in children. Other areas of interest include: development of specific and accessory immunity; the immunological interaction during pregnancy and lactation between mother and child. As Pediatric Allergy and Immunology promotes communication between scientists engaged in basic research and clinicians working with children, we publish both clinical and experimental work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信