视频眼反滚试验:在临床实践中对前庭功能障碍诊断的验证。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1002/ohn.1164
Idit Tessler, Amit Wolfovitz, Nir Abraham Gecel, Tomer Hazan, Nir Livneh, Shibli Alsleibi, Yoav Gimmon
{"title":"视频眼反滚试验:在临床实践中对前庭功能障碍诊断的验证。","authors":"Idit Tessler, Amit Wolfovitz, Nir Abraham Gecel, Tomer Hazan, Nir Livneh, Shibli Alsleibi, Yoav Gimmon","doi":"10.1002/ohn.1164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The video ocular counter-roll (vOCR) test is a novel method that uses video-oculography (VOG) goggles to detect vestibular dysfunction, potentially offering a simpler alternative to current vestibular function tests. In this study, we aim to compare the vOCR test with the caloric test for diagnosing vestibular dysfunction and to assess its clinical applicability.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A tertiary academic referral center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included all patients who underwent both vOCR and caloric tests during the same visit between 2021 and 2023. The patients were divided into 3 groups based upon caloric response: unilateral vestibular hypofunction (UVH), bilateral vestibular hypofunction (BVH), and normal. The vOCR test was performed with a 30° head tilt to both sides. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated for vOCR performance. The 2-step approach employed for utilizing the vOCR test included the average vOCR measurement for diagnosing BVH followed by the vOCR asymmetry ratio (AR) to UVH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 134 patients were included in the study, with 14 (10.5%) diagnosed with bilateral vestibular hypofunction (BVH), 44 (32.8%) with unilateral vestibular hypofunction (UVH), and 76 (56.7%) exhibiting normal vestibular function based on caloric testing. A vOCR cutoff value of 3.2° demonstrated sensitivity and specificity of 92.5% and 85.7%, respectively, for detecting BVH (AUC 95.1%, P < .001). An AR of 0.12 showed sensitivity and specificity of 97.7% and 63.2%, respectively, for detecting UVH (AUC 79.2%, P < .001). vOCR measurements differed significantly across all 3 groups (P < .001). In the UVH group, the vOCR angles were consistently smaller on the hypofunction side, suggesting laterality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>vOCR diagnoses vestibular dysfunction with high sensitivity and specificity compared to the caloric test. Incorporating vOCR into the vestibular testing battery could enhance diagnostic efficiency and patient comfort.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1703-1710"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Video Ocular Counter-Roll Test: Validation for Vestibular Dysfunction Diagnosis in Clinical Practice.\",\"authors\":\"Idit Tessler, Amit Wolfovitz, Nir Abraham Gecel, Tomer Hazan, Nir Livneh, Shibli Alsleibi, Yoav Gimmon\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ohn.1164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The video ocular counter-roll (vOCR) test is a novel method that uses video-oculography (VOG) goggles to detect vestibular dysfunction, potentially offering a simpler alternative to current vestibular function tests. In this study, we aim to compare the vOCR test with the caloric test for diagnosing vestibular dysfunction and to assess its clinical applicability.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A tertiary academic referral center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included all patients who underwent both vOCR and caloric tests during the same visit between 2021 and 2023. The patients were divided into 3 groups based upon caloric response: unilateral vestibular hypofunction (UVH), bilateral vestibular hypofunction (BVH), and normal. The vOCR test was performed with a 30° head tilt to both sides. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated for vOCR performance. The 2-step approach employed for utilizing the vOCR test included the average vOCR measurement for diagnosing BVH followed by the vOCR asymmetry ratio (AR) to UVH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 134 patients were included in the study, with 14 (10.5%) diagnosed with bilateral vestibular hypofunction (BVH), 44 (32.8%) with unilateral vestibular hypofunction (UVH), and 76 (56.7%) exhibiting normal vestibular function based on caloric testing. A vOCR cutoff value of 3.2° demonstrated sensitivity and specificity of 92.5% and 85.7%, respectively, for detecting BVH (AUC 95.1%, P < .001). An AR of 0.12 showed sensitivity and specificity of 97.7% and 63.2%, respectively, for detecting UVH (AUC 79.2%, P < .001). vOCR measurements differed significantly across all 3 groups (P < .001). In the UVH group, the vOCR angles were consistently smaller on the hypofunction side, suggesting laterality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>vOCR diagnoses vestibular dysfunction with high sensitivity and specificity compared to the caloric test. Incorporating vOCR into the vestibular testing battery could enhance diagnostic efficiency and patient comfort.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1703-1710\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1164\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1164","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:视频眼反滚(vOCR)测试是一种使用视频眼成像(VOG)护目镜检测前庭功能障碍的新方法,可能为当前的前庭功能测试提供更简单的替代方法。在本研究中,我们的目的是比较vOCR测试和热量测试诊断前庭功能障碍,并评估其临床适用性。研究设计:回顾性队列研究。环境:三级学术转诊中心。方法:这项回顾性研究包括所有在2021年至2023年同一次就诊期间接受vOCR和热量测试的患者。根据热反应将患者分为3组:单侧前庭功能减退组(UVH)、双侧前庭功能减退组(BVH)和正常组。在头部向两侧倾斜30°的情况下进行vOCR测试。计算vOCR性能的敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)。利用vOCR测试的两步方法包括诊断BVH的平均vOCR测量,然后是vOCR与UVH的不对称比(AR)。结果:本研究共纳入134例患者,其中14例(10.5%)诊断为双侧前庭功能减退(BVH), 44例(32.8%)诊断为单侧前庭功能减退(UVH), 76例(56.7%)根据热量测试显示前庭功能正常。当vOCR截断值为3.2°时,检测BVH的灵敏度和特异性分别为92.5%和85.7% (AUC为95.1%)。结论:与热量测试相比,vOCR诊断前庭功能障碍具有更高的灵敏度和特异性。将vOCR纳入前庭测试电池可提高诊断效率和患者舒适度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Video Ocular Counter-Roll Test: Validation for Vestibular Dysfunction Diagnosis in Clinical Practice.

Objective: The video ocular counter-roll (vOCR) test is a novel method that uses video-oculography (VOG) goggles to detect vestibular dysfunction, potentially offering a simpler alternative to current vestibular function tests. In this study, we aim to compare the vOCR test with the caloric test for diagnosing vestibular dysfunction and to assess its clinical applicability.

Study design: A retrospective cohort study.

Setting: A tertiary academic referral center.

Methods: This retrospective study included all patients who underwent both vOCR and caloric tests during the same visit between 2021 and 2023. The patients were divided into 3 groups based upon caloric response: unilateral vestibular hypofunction (UVH), bilateral vestibular hypofunction (BVH), and normal. The vOCR test was performed with a 30° head tilt to both sides. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated for vOCR performance. The 2-step approach employed for utilizing the vOCR test included the average vOCR measurement for diagnosing BVH followed by the vOCR asymmetry ratio (AR) to UVH.

Results: In total, 134 patients were included in the study, with 14 (10.5%) diagnosed with bilateral vestibular hypofunction (BVH), 44 (32.8%) with unilateral vestibular hypofunction (UVH), and 76 (56.7%) exhibiting normal vestibular function based on caloric testing. A vOCR cutoff value of 3.2° demonstrated sensitivity and specificity of 92.5% and 85.7%, respectively, for detecting BVH (AUC 95.1%, P < .001). An AR of 0.12 showed sensitivity and specificity of 97.7% and 63.2%, respectively, for detecting UVH (AUC 79.2%, P < .001). vOCR measurements differed significantly across all 3 groups (P < .001). In the UVH group, the vOCR angles were consistently smaller on the hypofunction side, suggesting laterality.

Conclusion: vOCR diagnoses vestibular dysfunction with high sensitivity and specificity compared to the caloric test. Incorporating vOCR into the vestibular testing battery could enhance diagnostic efficiency and patient comfort.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信