未缓解的压力、降低的恢复力和脱离的应对策略与癌症患者的低希望水平有关。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Laura Allaire, Astrid Block, Steven M Paul, Marilyn J Hammer, Yvette P Conley, Bruce A Cooper, Jon D Levine, Christine Miaskowski
{"title":"未缓解的压力、降低的恢复力和脱离的应对策略与癌症患者的低希望水平有关。","authors":"Laura Allaire, Astrid Block, Steven M Paul, Marilyn J Hammer, Yvette P Conley, Bruce A Cooper, Jon D Levine, Christine Miaskowski","doi":"10.1188/25.ONF.23-40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine clinically meaningful cut points for the Herth Hope Index and evaluate for differences in demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as stress, resilience, and coping, between patients with lower versus higher levels of hope.</p><p><strong>Sample & setting: </strong>Outpatients with cancer receiving chemotherapy (N = 1,295).</p><p><strong>Methods & variables: </strong>Patients completed the Herth Hope Index, Multidimensional Quality of Life Scale-Patient Version, and stress, resilience, and coping measures prior to their second or third cycle of chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Optimal cut points for the Herth Hope Index were 40 or less (i.e., lower level of hope) and greater than 40 (i.e., higher level of hope). The Lower Hope group had a higher comorbidity burden and lower functional status.</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing: </strong>Clinicians can use this information to educate patients about interventions that can decrease stress and improve their coping abilities. Patients with cancer may benefit from having conversations with clinicians that authentically convey prognosis and provide a realistic sense of hope.</p>","PeriodicalId":19549,"journal":{"name":"Oncology nursing forum","volume":"52 1","pages":"23-40"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12056870/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unrelieved Stress, Decreased Resilience, and Disengagement Coping Strategies Are Associated With Lower Levels of Hope in Patients With Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Allaire, Astrid Block, Steven M Paul, Marilyn J Hammer, Yvette P Conley, Bruce A Cooper, Jon D Levine, Christine Miaskowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1188/25.ONF.23-40\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine clinically meaningful cut points for the Herth Hope Index and evaluate for differences in demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as stress, resilience, and coping, between patients with lower versus higher levels of hope.</p><p><strong>Sample & setting: </strong>Outpatients with cancer receiving chemotherapy (N = 1,295).</p><p><strong>Methods & variables: </strong>Patients completed the Herth Hope Index, Multidimensional Quality of Life Scale-Patient Version, and stress, resilience, and coping measures prior to their second or third cycle of chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Optimal cut points for the Herth Hope Index were 40 or less (i.e., lower level of hope) and greater than 40 (i.e., higher level of hope). The Lower Hope group had a higher comorbidity burden and lower functional status.</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing: </strong>Clinicians can use this information to educate patients about interventions that can decrease stress and improve their coping abilities. Patients with cancer may benefit from having conversations with clinicians that authentically convey prognosis and provide a realistic sense of hope.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncology nursing forum\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"23-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12056870/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncology nursing forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1188/25.ONF.23-40\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology nursing forum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1188/25.ONF.23-40","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定具有临床意义的赫斯希望指数切点,并评估希望水平较低与较高的患者在人口学和临床特征、压力、恢复力和应对方面的差异。样本与环境:门诊接受化疗的癌症患者(N = 1295)。方法和变量:患者在第二或第三周期化疗前完成了赫斯希望指数、多维生活质量量表-患者版本、压力、恢复力和应对措施。结果:赫斯希望指数(Herth Hope Index)的最佳切点为小于等于40(即希望较低),大于等于40(即希望较高)。低希望组有较高的合并症负担和较低的功能状态。对护理的启示:临床医生可以使用这些信息来教育患者有关可以减少压力和提高他们应对能力的干预措施。癌症患者可能会受益于与临床医生的对话,真实地传达预后并提供现实的希望感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unrelieved Stress, Decreased Resilience, and Disengagement Coping Strategies Are Associated With Lower Levels of Hope in Patients With Cancer.

Objectives: To determine clinically meaningful cut points for the Herth Hope Index and evaluate for differences in demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as stress, resilience, and coping, between patients with lower versus higher levels of hope.

Sample & setting: Outpatients with cancer receiving chemotherapy (N = 1,295).

Methods & variables: Patients completed the Herth Hope Index, Multidimensional Quality of Life Scale-Patient Version, and stress, resilience, and coping measures prior to their second or third cycle of chemotherapy.

Results: Optimal cut points for the Herth Hope Index were 40 or less (i.e., lower level of hope) and greater than 40 (i.e., higher level of hope). The Lower Hope group had a higher comorbidity burden and lower functional status.

Implications for nursing: Clinicians can use this information to educate patients about interventions that can decrease stress and improve their coping abilities. Patients with cancer may benefit from having conversations with clinicians that authentically convey prognosis and provide a realistic sense of hope.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oncology nursing forum
Oncology nursing forum 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of the Oncology Nursing Forum, an official publication of ONS, is to Convey research information related to practice, technology, education, and leadership. Disseminate oncology nursing research and evidence-based practice to enhance transdisciplinary quality cancer care. Stimulate discussion of critical issues relevant to oncology nursing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信