[医学学术界职业道路中的性别差异:荷兰的一项全国性研究]。

Q4 Medicine
Silvan Licher, Daphne L van Helden, Margot M Weggemans, Coen B J van Deursen, Bas Holverda, Michiel van der Vaart, Miranda Wijdenes, Meike W Vernooij, Frank J Wolters
{"title":"[医学学术界职业道路中的性别差异:荷兰的一项全国性研究]。","authors":"Silvan Licher, Daphne L van Helden, Margot M Weggemans, Coen B J van Deursen, Bas Holverda, Michiel van der Vaart, Miranda Wijdenes, Meike W Vernooij, Frank J Wolters","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine gender differences in career progression of physicians.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We examined career progression until 2023 of 715 physicians who received their PhD in the Netherlands in 2007/2008. We also pooled data from 7 national grant programs from 2005 up until Jan 1, 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen years after their PhD defence, 43% of physicians worked in academia, similar for men and women. Men published more than women (9[3-27] vs. 6[2-15] publications; p=0.001), especially in academia. Women were less likely than men to be appointed full professor (10/330 vs. 27/385; odds ratio[95% CI]: 0.41[0.20-0.87]), which was mediated for 55% by their number of scientific publications. Women increasingly applied for research grants over time, with an equal number of women and men receiving 'early career' grants since 2015. More men applied for 'established investigator' grants, without any gender differences in award rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Career perspectives in the early phase after obtaining a PhD, including grant allocation, are similar for male and female physicians. Differences in their later career phase were partly related to a higher number of scientific publications by men, compared to women.</p>","PeriodicalId":18903,"journal":{"name":"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde","volume":"169 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Gender differences in career paths in medical academia: a nationwide study in the Netherlands].\",\"authors\":\"Silvan Licher, Daphne L van Helden, Margot M Weggemans, Coen B J van Deursen, Bas Holverda, Michiel van der Vaart, Miranda Wijdenes, Meike W Vernooij, Frank J Wolters\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine gender differences in career progression of physicians.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We examined career progression until 2023 of 715 physicians who received their PhD in the Netherlands in 2007/2008. We also pooled data from 7 national grant programs from 2005 up until Jan 1, 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen years after their PhD defence, 43% of physicians worked in academia, similar for men and women. Men published more than women (9[3-27] vs. 6[2-15] publications; p=0.001), especially in academia. Women were less likely than men to be appointed full professor (10/330 vs. 27/385; odds ratio[95% CI]: 0.41[0.20-0.87]), which was mediated for 55% by their number of scientific publications. Women increasingly applied for research grants over time, with an equal number of women and men receiving 'early career' grants since 2015. More men applied for 'established investigator' grants, without any gender differences in award rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Career perspectives in the early phase after obtaining a PhD, including grant allocation, are similar for male and female physicians. Differences in their later career phase were partly related to a higher number of scientific publications by men, compared to women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde\",\"volume\":\"169 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:了解医师职业发展的性别差异。设计:回顾性队列研究。方法:我们研究了2007/2008年在荷兰获得博士学位的715名医生到2023年的职业发展。我们还汇集了从2005年到2023年1月1日的7个国家资助项目的数据。结果:在获得博士学位15年后,43%的医生在学术界工作,男女比例相似。男性发表的论文多于女性(9篇[3-27]比6篇[2-15]);P =0.001),尤其是在学术界。女性被任命为正教授的可能性低于男性(10/330 vs. 27/385;优势比[95% CI]: 0.41[0.20-0.87]),其中55%是由他们发表的科学论文数量介导的。随着时间的推移,越来越多的女性申请研究资助,自2015年以来,女性和男性获得“早期职业”资助的人数相等。更多的男性申请“已建立的研究者”资助,在奖励率上没有任何性别差异。结论:男性和女性医生在获得博士学位后早期的职业前景,包括拨款分配,是相似的。他们在职业生涯后期的差异部分与男性比女性发表更多的科学论文有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Gender differences in career paths in medical academia: a nationwide study in the Netherlands].

Objective: To determine gender differences in career progression of physicians.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Method: We examined career progression until 2023 of 715 physicians who received their PhD in the Netherlands in 2007/2008. We also pooled data from 7 national grant programs from 2005 up until Jan 1, 2023.

Results: Fifteen years after their PhD defence, 43% of physicians worked in academia, similar for men and women. Men published more than women (9[3-27] vs. 6[2-15] publications; p=0.001), especially in academia. Women were less likely than men to be appointed full professor (10/330 vs. 27/385; odds ratio[95% CI]: 0.41[0.20-0.87]), which was mediated for 55% by their number of scientific publications. Women increasingly applied for research grants over time, with an equal number of women and men receiving 'early career' grants since 2015. More men applied for 'established investigator' grants, without any gender differences in award rates.

Conclusion: Career perspectives in the early phase after obtaining a PhD, including grant allocation, are similar for male and female physicians. Differences in their later career phase were partly related to a higher number of scientific publications by men, compared to women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde
Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Het NTVG staat bekend als hét wetenschappelijke algemene medische tijdschrift. De lange historie en de degelijkheid maken het tijdschrift tot een bolwerk van medische wetenschap in druk. Ook door de goede leesbaarheid draagt het tijdschrift bij aan de voortdurende dialoog over de geneeskunde.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信