使用广义倾向评分计数处理对顺序结果的因果效应:应用于产前护理和特定年龄儿童疫苗接种的数量。

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ashagrie Sharew Iyassu, Haile Mekonnen Fenta, Zelalem G Dessie, Temesgen T Zewotir
{"title":"使用广义倾向评分计数处理对顺序结果的因果效应:应用于产前护理和特定年龄儿童疫苗接种的数量。","authors":"Ashagrie Sharew Iyassu, Haile Mekonnen Fenta, Zelalem G Dessie, Temesgen T Zewotir","doi":"10.1007/s44197-025-00344-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many of the studies in causal inference using propensity scores relied on binary treatments where it is estimated by logistic regression or machine learning algorithms. Since 2000s, attention has been given for multiple values (categorical) and continuous treatments and the propensity score associated with such treatments is called generalized propensity score (GPS). However, there is scant literature on the use of count treatments in causal inference. Besides, effective sample size, after weighting, along with other methods has not been practiced for GPS model performance measure. The study was done with the aim of using count treatments in causal inference; select appropriate GPS and outcome models for such treatment and ordinal outcome.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A family of count models and a generalized boosted model (GBM) were used for GPS estimation. Their performance was measured in terms of covariate balancing power, effective sample size and the average treatment effect after GPS-based weighting. Marginal structural modeling (MSM) and covariate adjustment using GPS were used to estimate treatment effect on ordinal outcome. Stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting was used for covariate balancing assessment. Monte Carlo simulation study at various sample sizes with 1000 replication and household survey data were used in the study.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>GPS was trimmed at 1% and 99% which gave better results as compared to untrimmed results. The generalized boosted model performed well both in simulation and actual data producing a larger effective sample size and smaller metrics when estimating average treatment effect on the outcome. The MSM was found better than GPS as a covariate in the outcome model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is important to trim GPS when it approaches zero or one without loss of more information due to trimming. Effective sample size after weighting should be used along with other methods such as correlation and absolute standardized mean differences for GPS model selection. GBM should be used for GPS estimation for count treatments. MSM is important for the outcome model when weighting GPS method is used. Finally, the number of antenatal care services had an increasing effect on the probability of age-specific childhood vaccination.</p>","PeriodicalId":15796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health","volume":"15 1","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11822178/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causal Effect of Count Treatment on Ordinal Outcome Using Generalized Propensity Score: Application to Number of Antenatal Care and Age Specific Childhood Vaccination.\",\"authors\":\"Ashagrie Sharew Iyassu, Haile Mekonnen Fenta, Zelalem G Dessie, Temesgen T Zewotir\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s44197-025-00344-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many of the studies in causal inference using propensity scores relied on binary treatments where it is estimated by logistic regression or machine learning algorithms. Since 2000s, attention has been given for multiple values (categorical) and continuous treatments and the propensity score associated with such treatments is called generalized propensity score (GPS). However, there is scant literature on the use of count treatments in causal inference. Besides, effective sample size, after weighting, along with other methods has not been practiced for GPS model performance measure. The study was done with the aim of using count treatments in causal inference; select appropriate GPS and outcome models for such treatment and ordinal outcome.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A family of count models and a generalized boosted model (GBM) were used for GPS estimation. Their performance was measured in terms of covariate balancing power, effective sample size and the average treatment effect after GPS-based weighting. Marginal structural modeling (MSM) and covariate adjustment using GPS were used to estimate treatment effect on ordinal outcome. Stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting was used for covariate balancing assessment. Monte Carlo simulation study at various sample sizes with 1000 replication and household survey data were used in the study.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>GPS was trimmed at 1% and 99% which gave better results as compared to untrimmed results. The generalized boosted model performed well both in simulation and actual data producing a larger effective sample size and smaller metrics when estimating average treatment effect on the outcome. The MSM was found better than GPS as a covariate in the outcome model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is important to trim GPS when it approaches zero or one without loss of more information due to trimming. Effective sample size after weighting should be used along with other methods such as correlation and absolute standardized mean differences for GPS model selection. GBM should be used for GPS estimation for count treatments. MSM is important for the outcome model when weighting GPS method is used. Finally, the number of antenatal care services had an increasing effect on the probability of age-specific childhood vaccination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11822178/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44197-025-00344-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44197-025-00344-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使用倾向分数进行因果推理的许多研究依赖于二元处理,其中通过逻辑回归或机器学习算法进行估计。自2000年以来,人们开始关注多值(分类)和连续治疗,与这些治疗相关的倾向评分被称为广义倾向评分(GPS)。然而,在因果推理中使用计数处理的文献很少。此外,在GPS模型性能度量中,加权后的有效样本量等方法尚未得到实践。本研究的目的是在因果推理中使用计数处理;为这种治疗和常规结果选择适当的GPS和结果模型。方法:采用一组计数模型和一种广义增强模型(GBM)进行GPS估计。他们的表现以协变量平衡能力、有效样本量和基于gps加权后的平均处理效果来衡量。使用边际结构模型(MSM)和GPS协变量调整来估计治疗对有序结局的影响。协变量平衡评价采用稳定逆概率处理加权。研究中采用了不同样本量的蒙特卡罗模拟研究和1000个重复的家庭调查数据。结果:GPS被修剪为1%和99%,与未修剪的结果相比,结果更好。广义增强模型在模拟和实际数据中都表现良好,在估计平均治疗效果时产生更大的有效样本量和更小的指标。在结果模型中,MSM作为协变量优于GPS。结论:当GPS接近0或1时,修剪GPS是很重要的,而不会因为修剪而损失更多的信息。在GPS模型选择中,加权后的有效样本量应与相关、绝对标准化平均差等方法配合使用。GBM应用于GPS估计计数处理。当使用加权GPS方法时,MSM对结果模型非常重要。最后,产前保健服务的数量对特定年龄儿童疫苗接种的可能性有越来越大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Causal Effect of Count Treatment on Ordinal Outcome Using Generalized Propensity Score: Application to Number of Antenatal Care and Age Specific Childhood Vaccination.

Background: Many of the studies in causal inference using propensity scores relied on binary treatments where it is estimated by logistic regression or machine learning algorithms. Since 2000s, attention has been given for multiple values (categorical) and continuous treatments and the propensity score associated with such treatments is called generalized propensity score (GPS). However, there is scant literature on the use of count treatments in causal inference. Besides, effective sample size, after weighting, along with other methods has not been practiced for GPS model performance measure. The study was done with the aim of using count treatments in causal inference; select appropriate GPS and outcome models for such treatment and ordinal outcome.

Method: A family of count models and a generalized boosted model (GBM) were used for GPS estimation. Their performance was measured in terms of covariate balancing power, effective sample size and the average treatment effect after GPS-based weighting. Marginal structural modeling (MSM) and covariate adjustment using GPS were used to estimate treatment effect on ordinal outcome. Stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting was used for covariate balancing assessment. Monte Carlo simulation study at various sample sizes with 1000 replication and household survey data were used in the study.

Result: GPS was trimmed at 1% and 99% which gave better results as compared to untrimmed results. The generalized boosted model performed well both in simulation and actual data producing a larger effective sample size and smaller metrics when estimating average treatment effect on the outcome. The MSM was found better than GPS as a covariate in the outcome model.

Conclusion: It is important to trim GPS when it approaches zero or one without loss of more information due to trimming. Effective sample size after weighting should be used along with other methods such as correlation and absolute standardized mean differences for GPS model selection. GBM should be used for GPS estimation for count treatments. MSM is important for the outcome model when weighting GPS method is used. Finally, the number of antenatal care services had an increasing effect on the probability of age-specific childhood vaccination.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
1.40%
发文量
57
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health is an esteemed international publication, offering a platform for peer-reviewed articles that drive advancements in global epidemiology and international health. Our mission is to shape global health policy by showcasing cutting-edge scholarship and innovative strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信