Donna S Macmillan, Pravin Ambure, Vicente Aranda, Yannick Bayona, Vera Bonderovic, Jay Dawick, Nicolas Fabre, Stephan Fischer, Geoff Hodges, Ágata Llobet-Mut, Sophie Loisel-Joubert, Claudia Rivetti, Jayne Roberts, Kristin Schirmer, Eva Serrano-Candelas, Blanca Serrano Ramón, Ricky A Stackhouse
{"title":"使用非动物定义方法解决急性毒性危害分类的挑战。","authors":"Donna S Macmillan, Pravin Ambure, Vicente Aranda, Yannick Bayona, Vera Bonderovic, Jay Dawick, Nicolas Fabre, Stephan Fischer, Geoff Hodges, Ágata Llobet-Mut, Sophie Loisel-Joubert, Claudia Rivetti, Jayne Roberts, Kristin Schirmer, Eva Serrano-Candelas, Blanca Serrano Ramón, Ricky A Stackhouse","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute fish toxicity is an ecotoxicological endpoint that provides important information about a chemical's potential to elicit (an) adverse effect(s) on fish. These effects are typically studied using in vivo tests, but for animal welfare reasons as well as the quest for increased species relevance, biological coverage, mechanistic understanding of effects, and throughput, there have been significant efforts in recent years to reduce or replace the use of animals in (eco)toxicological hazard assessment by developing defined approaches (DA) or integrated approaches to testing and assessment. To this end, a novel score-based DA has been developed as a proof-of-concept, which integrates three in silico predictions from freely available (quantitative) structure activity relationship models: the VEGA Fish (KNN-Read-Across) and Fathead Minnow (KNN-IRFMN) models and the United States Environmental Protection Agency ECOSAR Fish 96-h LC50 model, along with in vitro RTgill-W1 data. The DA provides a categorical output aligned with the United Nations Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling framework (Acute Category 1, Acute Category 2, Acute Category 3, or Not Classified) with an overall accuracy of 80%, offering a reliable alternative to traditional in vivo testing methods for acute fish toxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":"2659-2672"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing the challenges of acute fish toxicity hazard classification using a non-animal defined approach.\",\"authors\":\"Donna S Macmillan, Pravin Ambure, Vicente Aranda, Yannick Bayona, Vera Bonderovic, Jay Dawick, Nicolas Fabre, Stephan Fischer, Geoff Hodges, Ágata Llobet-Mut, Sophie Loisel-Joubert, Claudia Rivetti, Jayne Roberts, Kristin Schirmer, Eva Serrano-Candelas, Blanca Serrano Ramón, Ricky A Stackhouse\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Acute fish toxicity is an ecotoxicological endpoint that provides important information about a chemical's potential to elicit (an) adverse effect(s) on fish. These effects are typically studied using in vivo tests, but for animal welfare reasons as well as the quest for increased species relevance, biological coverage, mechanistic understanding of effects, and throughput, there have been significant efforts in recent years to reduce or replace the use of animals in (eco)toxicological hazard assessment by developing defined approaches (DA) or integrated approaches to testing and assessment. To this end, a novel score-based DA has been developed as a proof-of-concept, which integrates three in silico predictions from freely available (quantitative) structure activity relationship models: the VEGA Fish (KNN-Read-Across) and Fathead Minnow (KNN-IRFMN) models and the United States Environmental Protection Agency ECOSAR Fish 96-h LC50 model, along with in vitro RTgill-W1 data. The DA provides a categorical output aligned with the United Nations Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling framework (Acute Category 1, Acute Category 2, Acute Category 3, or Not Classified) with an overall accuracy of 80%, offering a reliable alternative to traditional in vivo testing methods for acute fish toxicity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2659-2672\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf046\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
鱼类急性毒性是一个生态毒理学终点,它提供了一种化学品对鱼类产生不良影响的潜力的重要信息。这些影响通常使用体内试验进行研究,但出于动物福利的原因,以及寻求增加物种相关性、生物覆盖率、对影响的机制理解和吞吐量,近年来已作出重大努力,通过制定确定方法(DA)或综合测试和评估方法(IATA),减少或取代(生态)毒理学危害评估中动物的使用。为此,研究人员开发了一种新的基于评分的数据分析方法,该方法整合了三种来自免费(Q) sar的计算机预测:VEGA Fish (KNN-Read-Across)和fahead Minnow (KNN-IRFMN)模型和美国环境保护署(USEPA) ECOSAR Fish 96-h LC50模型,以及体外rtggil - w1数据。DA提供与联合国全球统一分类和标签系统(GHS)框架一致的分类输出(急性1类、急性2类、急性3类或未分类),总体准确率为80%,为鱼类急性毒性的传统体内测试方法提供了可靠的替代方案。
Addressing the challenges of acute fish toxicity hazard classification using a non-animal defined approach.
Acute fish toxicity is an ecotoxicological endpoint that provides important information about a chemical's potential to elicit (an) adverse effect(s) on fish. These effects are typically studied using in vivo tests, but for animal welfare reasons as well as the quest for increased species relevance, biological coverage, mechanistic understanding of effects, and throughput, there have been significant efforts in recent years to reduce or replace the use of animals in (eco)toxicological hazard assessment by developing defined approaches (DA) or integrated approaches to testing and assessment. To this end, a novel score-based DA has been developed as a proof-of-concept, which integrates three in silico predictions from freely available (quantitative) structure activity relationship models: the VEGA Fish (KNN-Read-Across) and Fathead Minnow (KNN-IRFMN) models and the United States Environmental Protection Agency ECOSAR Fish 96-h LC50 model, along with in vitro RTgill-W1 data. The DA provides a categorical output aligned with the United Nations Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling framework (Acute Category 1, Acute Category 2, Acute Category 3, or Not Classified) with an overall accuracy of 80%, offering a reliable alternative to traditional in vivo testing methods for acute fish toxicity.
期刊介绍:
The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...]
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.