意外硬脑膜穿刺和硬脑膜穿刺后头痛的发生率和处理:回顾性数据库研究。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
European Journal of Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1097/EJA.0000000000002130
Stav Cohen, Chaim Greenberger, Boris Aptekman, Victor Rabkin, Carolyn F Weiniger
{"title":"意外硬脑膜穿刺和硬脑膜穿刺后头痛的发生率和处理:回顾性数据库研究。","authors":"Stav Cohen, Chaim Greenberger, Boris Aptekman, Victor Rabkin, Carolyn F Weiniger","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is a common complication of neuraxial block resulting from either intentional dural puncture (IDP) or accidental dural puncture (ADP).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective was to estimate the rate of PDPH and ADP following introduction of a real-time documentation system in April 2018. Secondary objectives included examining the use of epidural blood patch (EBP) and investigating risk factors associated with ADP and PDPH.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Secondary care at a tertiary hospital from January 2017 to April 2022.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Three hundred and eleven adult parturients after neuraxial block, with PDPH or a reported ADP, were identified during the procedure or postpartum.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Implementation of a real-time documentation system in April 2018 to improve PDPH and ADP documentation.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Rates of PDPH and ADP, performance of epidural blood patch, and risk factors associated with PDPH and ADP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall rate of PDPH was 0.4% (164/39888), 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.0036 to 0.0049, and the rate of ADP was 0.9% (284/31635), 95% CI 0.0078 to 0.0099. During the real-time documentation period, the rates were 0.44% (157/35376), 95% CI 0.0038 to 0.0052, and 0.99% (279/28121), 95% CI 0.0088 to 0.0111, for PDPH and ADP respectively. Thirty-two (10.3%) cases had IDP, and 279 (89.7%) had ADP. Among 279 ADP cases, 76.3% were identified during the procedure, 10.4% were suspected and 13.3% were identified postpartum. Cases of ADP identified postpartum had more emergency room visits (19%). Epidural blood patch was administered in 72% of PDPH cases, with a high first-time success rate (89.5%); Eleven women received EBP after IDP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Postdural puncture headache remains a significant concern. In our cohort, 13.3% of ADP cases were detected postpartum, posing an increased challenge and underscoring the critical importance of follow-up care. We confirm that epidural blood patch may be required following any neuraxial block.</p>","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"492-499"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence and management of accidental dural puncture and postdural puncture headache in parturients: Retrospective database study.\",\"authors\":\"Stav Cohen, Chaim Greenberger, Boris Aptekman, Victor Rabkin, Carolyn F Weiniger\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is a common complication of neuraxial block resulting from either intentional dural puncture (IDP) or accidental dural puncture (ADP).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective was to estimate the rate of PDPH and ADP following introduction of a real-time documentation system in April 2018. Secondary objectives included examining the use of epidural blood patch (EBP) and investigating risk factors associated with ADP and PDPH.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Secondary care at a tertiary hospital from January 2017 to April 2022.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Three hundred and eleven adult parturients after neuraxial block, with PDPH or a reported ADP, were identified during the procedure or postpartum.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Implementation of a real-time documentation system in April 2018 to improve PDPH and ADP documentation.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Rates of PDPH and ADP, performance of epidural blood patch, and risk factors associated with PDPH and ADP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall rate of PDPH was 0.4% (164/39888), 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.0036 to 0.0049, and the rate of ADP was 0.9% (284/31635), 95% CI 0.0078 to 0.0099. During the real-time documentation period, the rates were 0.44% (157/35376), 95% CI 0.0038 to 0.0052, and 0.99% (279/28121), 95% CI 0.0088 to 0.0111, for PDPH and ADP respectively. Thirty-two (10.3%) cases had IDP, and 279 (89.7%) had ADP. Among 279 ADP cases, 76.3% were identified during the procedure, 10.4% were suspected and 13.3% were identified postpartum. Cases of ADP identified postpartum had more emergency room visits (19%). Epidural blood patch was administered in 72% of PDPH cases, with a high first-time success rate (89.5%); Eleven women received EBP after IDP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Postdural puncture headache remains a significant concern. In our cohort, 13.3% of ADP cases were detected postpartum, posing an increased challenge and underscoring the critical importance of follow-up care. We confirm that epidural blood patch may be required following any neuraxial block.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"492-499\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002130\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002130","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:硬脊膜穿刺后头痛(PDPH)是由故意硬脊膜穿刺(IDP)或意外硬脊膜穿刺(ADP)引起的神经轴传导阻滞的常见并发症。目的:主要目的是估计2018年4月引入实时文件系统后PDPH和ADP的发生率。次要目的包括检查硬膜外血贴片(EBP)的使用和调查与ADP和PDPH相关的危险因素。设计:回顾性队列研究。环境:2017年1月至2022年4月在一家三级医院接受二级护理。患者:311例经神经轴阻滞的成年产妇,在手术过程中或产后确诊为PDPH或ADP。干预措施:2018年4月实施实时文件系统,以改进PDPH和ADP文件。主要结局指标:PDPH和ADP的发生率,硬膜外血贴的表现,以及与PDPH和ADP相关的危险因素。结果:PDPH总发生率为0.4%(164/39888),95%可信区间(CI)为0.0036 ~ 0.0049;ADP总发生率为0.9% (284/31635),95% CI为0.0078 ~ 0.0099。在实时记录期间,PDPH和ADP的发生率分别为0.44% (157/35376),95% CI为0.0038 ~ 0.0052,0.99% (279/28121),95% CI为0.0088 ~ 0.0111。IDP 32例(10.3%),ADP 279例(89.7%)。279例ADP中,76.3%在术中确诊,10.4%为疑似,13.3%为产后确诊。产后确诊的ADP患者有更多的急诊室就诊(19%)。72%的PDPH患者使用硬膜外血贴(EBP),首次成功率高(89.5%);11名妇女在IDP后接受硬膜外补血。结论:硬脊膜穿刺后头痛仍然值得关注。在我们的队列中,13.3%的ADP病例是在产后发现的,这带来了更大的挑战,并强调了随访护理的重要性。我们确认,在任何神经轴阻滞后,可能需要硬膜外补血。试验注册:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incidence and management of accidental dural puncture and postdural puncture headache in parturients: Retrospective database study.

Background: Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is a common complication of neuraxial block resulting from either intentional dural puncture (IDP) or accidental dural puncture (ADP).

Objectives: The primary objective was to estimate the rate of PDPH and ADP following introduction of a real-time documentation system in April 2018. Secondary objectives included examining the use of epidural blood patch (EBP) and investigating risk factors associated with ADP and PDPH.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Secondary care at a tertiary hospital from January 2017 to April 2022.

Patients: Three hundred and eleven adult parturients after neuraxial block, with PDPH or a reported ADP, were identified during the procedure or postpartum.

Interventions: Implementation of a real-time documentation system in April 2018 to improve PDPH and ADP documentation.

Main outcome measures: Rates of PDPH and ADP, performance of epidural blood patch, and risk factors associated with PDPH and ADP.

Results: The overall rate of PDPH was 0.4% (164/39888), 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.0036 to 0.0049, and the rate of ADP was 0.9% (284/31635), 95% CI 0.0078 to 0.0099. During the real-time documentation period, the rates were 0.44% (157/35376), 95% CI 0.0038 to 0.0052, and 0.99% (279/28121), 95% CI 0.0088 to 0.0111, for PDPH and ADP respectively. Thirty-two (10.3%) cases had IDP, and 279 (89.7%) had ADP. Among 279 ADP cases, 76.3% were identified during the procedure, 10.4% were suspected and 13.3% were identified postpartum. Cases of ADP identified postpartum had more emergency room visits (19%). Epidural blood patch was administered in 72% of PDPH cases, with a high first-time success rate (89.5%); Eleven women received EBP after IDP.

Conclusions: Postdural puncture headache remains a significant concern. In our cohort, 13.3% of ADP cases were detected postpartum, posing an increased challenge and underscoring the critical importance of follow-up care. We confirm that epidural blood patch may be required following any neuraxial block.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
351
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA) publishes original work of high scientific quality in the field of anaesthesiology, pain, emergency medicine and intensive care. Preference is given to experimental work or clinical observation in man, and to laboratory work of clinical relevance. The journal also publishes commissioned reviews by an authority, editorials, invited commentaries, special articles, pro and con debates, and short reports (correspondences, case reports, short reports of clinical studies).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信