冠状动脉疾病干预对肺移植候选人的预后意义。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiology Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1159/000543400
Eran Yerushalmi, Tal Abu, David Hasdai, Yaron Aviv, Ran Kornowski, Keren Skalsky
{"title":"冠状动脉疾病干预对肺移植候选人的预后意义。","authors":"Eran Yerushalmi, Tal Abu, David Hasdai, Yaron Aviv, Ran Kornowski, Keren Skalsky","doi":"10.1159/000543400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lung transplantation (LT) is a lifesaving procedure in patients with end stage lung failure. The prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with lung disease is comparably high, and coronary angiography is widely used for coronary anatomy assessment prior to LT. Detection of significant CAD usually results in revascularization to minimize posttransplant cardiovascular events. We aim to examine the prognostic significance of CAD interventions on LT candidates pre- and post-LT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From a retrospective registry of 450 LT candidates undergoing cardiac catheterization during 2014-2019, patients were assessed for the presence of significant CAD and percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary outcome was defined as occurrence of major advance cardiac events (MACE) in LT candidates while on the waiting list. MACE comprising of cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, target-vessel revascularization, and coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Secondary outcomes were the occurrence of MACE posttransplant according to the coronary intervention status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MACE was recorded in 22 LT candidates, with a higher incidence in the intervention group compared to the nonintervention group (8.3% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.007). 28.6% of MACE events in the intervention group occurred in the first month after intervention. Cardiovascular mortality accounted for 8.6% of all deaths, without significant difference between the intervention and nonintervention group (16.0% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.155). The rates of MACE post-LT were mildly and nonsignificantly increased in the intervention group compared to the nonintervention group (11.1% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.18).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pre-LT routine coronary intervention does not necessarily protect patients from experiencing MACE while on the waiting list or post-LT.</p>","PeriodicalId":9391,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Prognostic Significance of Coronary Artery Disease Interventions in Lung Transplant Candidates.\",\"authors\":\"Eran Yerushalmi, Tal Abu, David Hasdai, Yaron Aviv, Ran Kornowski, Keren Skalsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000543400\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lung transplantation (LT) is a lifesaving procedure in patients with end stage lung failure. The prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with lung disease is comparably high, and coronary angiography is widely used for coronary anatomy assessment prior to LT. Detection of significant CAD usually results in revascularization to minimize posttransplant cardiovascular events. We aim to examine the prognostic significance of CAD interventions on LT candidates pre- and post-LT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From a retrospective registry of 450 LT candidates undergoing cardiac catheterization during 2014-2019, patients were assessed for the presence of significant CAD and percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary outcome was defined as occurrence of major advance cardiac events (MACE) in LT candidates while on the waiting list. MACE comprising of cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, target-vessel revascularization, and coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Secondary outcomes were the occurrence of MACE posttransplant according to the coronary intervention status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MACE was recorded in 22 LT candidates, with a higher incidence in the intervention group compared to the nonintervention group (8.3% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.007). 28.6% of MACE events in the intervention group occurred in the first month after intervention. Cardiovascular mortality accounted for 8.6% of all deaths, without significant difference between the intervention and nonintervention group (16.0% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.155). The rates of MACE post-LT were mildly and nonsignificantly increased in the intervention group compared to the nonintervention group (11.1% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.18).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pre-LT routine coronary intervention does not necessarily protect patients from experiencing MACE while on the waiting list or post-LT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543400\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543400","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肺移植(LT)是终末期肺衰竭患者的救命手段。肺部疾病患者的冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患病率相对较高,冠状动脉造影被广泛用于移植前的冠状动脉解剖评估。检测到明显的CAD通常会导致血运重建术,以尽量减少移植后心血管事件。我们的目的是研究冠心病干预对LT患者在LT前和LT后的预后意义。方法:从2014-2019年接受心导管术的450名LT候选人的回顾性登记中,评估患者是否存在明显的CAD和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。主要终点被定义为等待名单上的LT候选人发生主要进展性心脏事件(MACE)。MACE包括心血管死亡率、非致死性心肌梗死、靶血管重建术和冠状动脉搭桥手术。次要结局是根据冠脉介入状态观察移植后MACE的发生情况。结果:22名LT候选人中记录了MACE,干预组的发生率高于非干预组(8.3%对4.4%,p = 0.007)。28.6%的MACE事件发生在干预后的第一个月。心血管死亡率占所有死亡的8.6%,干预组和非干预组之间无显著差异(16.0%比7.2%,p = 0.155)。与非干预组相比,干预组lt后MACE发生率轻度且无显著升高(11.1%比4.5%,p = 0.18)。结论:肝移植前常规冠状动脉介入治疗不一定能保护患者在等待名单上或肝移植后不发生MACE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Prognostic Significance of Coronary Artery Disease Interventions in Lung Transplant Candidates.

Introduction: Lung transplantation (LT) is a lifesaving procedure in patients with end stage lung failure. The prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with lung disease is comparably high, and coronary angiography is widely used for coronary anatomy assessment prior to LT. Detection of significant CAD usually results in revascularization to minimize posttransplant cardiovascular events. We aim to examine the prognostic significance of CAD interventions on LT candidates pre- and post-LT.

Methods: From a retrospective registry of 450 LT candidates undergoing cardiac catheterization during 2014-2019, patients were assessed for the presence of significant CAD and percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary outcome was defined as occurrence of major advance cardiac events (MACE) in LT candidates while on the waiting list. MACE comprising of cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, target-vessel revascularization, and coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Secondary outcomes were the occurrence of MACE posttransplant according to the coronary intervention status.

Results: MACE was recorded in 22 LT candidates, with a higher incidence in the intervention group compared to the nonintervention group (8.3% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.007). 28.6% of MACE events in the intervention group occurred in the first month after intervention. Cardiovascular mortality accounted for 8.6% of all deaths, without significant difference between the intervention and nonintervention group (16.0% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.155). The rates of MACE post-LT were mildly and nonsignificantly increased in the intervention group compared to the nonintervention group (11.1% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.18).

Conclusion: Pre-LT routine coronary intervention does not necessarily protect patients from experiencing MACE while on the waiting list or post-LT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiology
Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
56
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ''Cardiology'' features first reports on original clinical, preclinical and fundamental research as well as ''Novel Insights from Clinical Experience'' and topical comprehensive reviews in selected areas of cardiovascular disease. ''Editorial Comments'' provide a critical but positive evaluation of a recent article. Papers not only describe but offer critical appraisals of new developments in non-invasive and invasive diagnostic methods and in pharmacologic, nutritional and mechanical/surgical therapies. Readers are thus kept informed of current strategies in the prevention, recognition and treatment of heart disease. Special sections in a variety of subspecialty areas reinforce the journal''s value as a complete record of recent progress for all cardiologists, internists, cardiac surgeons, clinical physiologists, pharmacologists and professionals in other areas of medicine interested in current activity in cardiovascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信