通过最小共同祖先约束简化和表征dag和系统发育网络。

IF 2 4区 数学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Anna Lindeberg, Marc Hellmuth
{"title":"通过最小共同祖先约束简化和表征dag和系统发育网络。","authors":"Anna Lindeberg, Marc Hellmuth","doi":"10.1007/s11538-025-01419-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rooted phylogenetic networks, or more generally, directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), are widely used to model species or gene relationships that traditional rooted trees cannot fully capture, especially in the presence of reticulate processes or horizontal gene transfers. Such networks or DAGs are typically inferred from observable data (e.g., genomic sequences of extant species), providing only an estimate of the true evolutionary history. However, these inferred DAGs are often complex and difficult to interpret. In particular, many contain vertices that do not serve as least common ancestors (LCAs) for any subset of the underlying genes or species, thus may lack direct support from the observable data. In contrast, LCA vertices are witnessed by historical traces justifying their existence and thus represent ancestral states substantiated by the data. To reduce unnecessary complexity and eliminate unsupported vertices, we aim to simplify a DAG to retain only LCA vertices while preserving essential evolutionary information. In this paper, we characterize <math><mtext>LCA</mtext></math> -relevant and <math><mtext>lca</mtext></math> -relevant DAGs, defined as those in which every vertex serves as an LCA (or unique LCA) for some subset of taxa. We introduce methods to identify LCAs in DAGs and efficiently transform any DAG into an <math><mtext>LCA</mtext></math> -relevant or <math><mtext>lca</mtext></math> -relevant one while preserving key structural properties of the original DAG or network. This transformation is achieved using a simple operator \" <math><mo>⊖</mo></math> \" that mimics vertex suppression.</p>","PeriodicalId":9372,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Mathematical Biology","volume":"87 3","pages":"44"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11821803/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simplifying and Characterizing DAGs and Phylogenetic Networks via Least Common Ancestor Constraints.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Lindeberg, Marc Hellmuth\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11538-025-01419-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Rooted phylogenetic networks, or more generally, directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), are widely used to model species or gene relationships that traditional rooted trees cannot fully capture, especially in the presence of reticulate processes or horizontal gene transfers. Such networks or DAGs are typically inferred from observable data (e.g., genomic sequences of extant species), providing only an estimate of the true evolutionary history. However, these inferred DAGs are often complex and difficult to interpret. In particular, many contain vertices that do not serve as least common ancestors (LCAs) for any subset of the underlying genes or species, thus may lack direct support from the observable data. In contrast, LCA vertices are witnessed by historical traces justifying their existence and thus represent ancestral states substantiated by the data. To reduce unnecessary complexity and eliminate unsupported vertices, we aim to simplify a DAG to retain only LCA vertices while preserving essential evolutionary information. In this paper, we characterize <math><mtext>LCA</mtext></math> -relevant and <math><mtext>lca</mtext></math> -relevant DAGs, defined as those in which every vertex serves as an LCA (or unique LCA) for some subset of taxa. We introduce methods to identify LCAs in DAGs and efficiently transform any DAG into an <math><mtext>LCA</mtext></math> -relevant or <math><mtext>lca</mtext></math> -relevant one while preserving key structural properties of the original DAG or network. This transformation is achieved using a simple operator \\\" <math><mo>⊖</mo></math> \\\" that mimics vertex suppression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Mathematical Biology\",\"volume\":\"87 3\",\"pages\":\"44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11821803/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Mathematical Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-025-01419-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Mathematical Biology","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-025-01419-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有根系统发育网络,或更一般地说,有向无环图(dag),被广泛用于模拟物种或基因关系,传统的有根树不能完全捕获,特别是在存在网状过程或水平基因转移的情况下。这种网络或dag通常是从可观察到的数据(例如,现存物种的基因组序列)推断出来的,只能提供对真实进化历史的估计。然而,这些推断出的dag通常很复杂,难以解释。特别是,许多包含的顶点不作为潜在基因或物种的任何子集的最小共同祖先(lca),因此可能缺乏可观察数据的直接支持。相比之下,LCA顶点由历史痕迹见证,证明了它们的存在,因此代表了由数据证实的祖先状态。为了减少不必要的复杂性和消除不支持的顶点,我们的目标是简化DAG,只保留LCA顶点,同时保留必要的进化信息。在本文中,我们描述了LCA相关和LCA相关的dag,定义为那些每个顶点都充当某个分类群子集的LCA(或唯一LCA)的dag。我们介绍了识别DAG中的LCA的方法,并有效地将任何DAG转换为LCA相关或LCA相关的DAG,同时保留原始DAG或网络的关键结构属性。这种转换是使用一个简单的操作符“- - -”来实现的,它模拟了顶点抑制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simplifying and Characterizing DAGs and Phylogenetic Networks via Least Common Ancestor Constraints.

Rooted phylogenetic networks, or more generally, directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), are widely used to model species or gene relationships that traditional rooted trees cannot fully capture, especially in the presence of reticulate processes or horizontal gene transfers. Such networks or DAGs are typically inferred from observable data (e.g., genomic sequences of extant species), providing only an estimate of the true evolutionary history. However, these inferred DAGs are often complex and difficult to interpret. In particular, many contain vertices that do not serve as least common ancestors (LCAs) for any subset of the underlying genes or species, thus may lack direct support from the observable data. In contrast, LCA vertices are witnessed by historical traces justifying their existence and thus represent ancestral states substantiated by the data. To reduce unnecessary complexity and eliminate unsupported vertices, we aim to simplify a DAG to retain only LCA vertices while preserving essential evolutionary information. In this paper, we characterize LCA -relevant and lca -relevant DAGs, defined as those in which every vertex serves as an LCA (or unique LCA) for some subset of taxa. We introduce methods to identify LCAs in DAGs and efficiently transform any DAG into an LCA -relevant or lca -relevant one while preserving key structural properties of the original DAG or network. This transformation is achieved using a simple operator " " that mimics vertex suppression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.60%
发文量
123
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, the official journal of the Society for Mathematical Biology, disseminates original research findings and other information relevant to the interface of biology and the mathematical sciences. Contributions should have relevance to both fields. In order to accommodate the broad scope of new developments, the journal accepts a variety of contributions, including: Original research articles focused on new biological insights gained with the help of tools from the mathematical sciences or new mathematical tools and methods with demonstrated applicability to biological investigations Research in mathematical biology education Reviews Commentaries Perspectives, and contributions that discuss issues important to the profession All contributions are peer-reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信