基于web的生态证据输入表单为合成应用程序提供了一致的、可访问的提取和可视化

IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Caroline E. Ridley, Casey Hansen, Peter Byrley, Tara Greaver, S. Douglas Kaylor, R. Byron Rice, Kate A. Schofield, Andrew Shapiro
{"title":"基于web的生态证据输入表单为合成应用程序提供了一致的、可访问的提取和可视化","authors":"Caroline E. Ridley,&nbsp;Casey Hansen,&nbsp;Peter Byrley,&nbsp;Tara Greaver,&nbsp;S. Douglas Kaylor,&nbsp;R. Byron Rice,&nbsp;Kate A. Schofield,&nbsp;Andrew Shapiro","doi":"10.1111/csp2.13278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Applying scientific evidence to conservation, environmental management, and policy-making improves outcomes. When synthesizing existing evidence, substantial resources are required to access and read scientific publications and extract and analyze decision-relevant information. To improve this process, we developed a free, publicly available, web-based evidence entry form tailored to extract information about cause-effect relationships from ecological publications. The form enables storage, retrieval, reuse, and visualization of qualitative and quantitative ecological and environmental evidence extracted from publications. Evidence can be analyzed for a wide range of synthesis purposes (e.g., causal assessments, hypothesis testing) and approaches (e.g., rapid reviews, meta-analyses). The database schema underlying the form logically relates information about (a) a publication, (b) its experimental design(s), and (c) reported cause-effect relationships. An ontology of controlled terminology enables consistent extraction and characterization of causes and effects across users, facilitating evidence reuse. Future capabilities include customization of terminology and incorporation of study quality information.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"7 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.13278","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Web-based ecological evidence entry form enables consistent, accessible extraction and visualization for synthesis applications\",\"authors\":\"Caroline E. Ridley,&nbsp;Casey Hansen,&nbsp;Peter Byrley,&nbsp;Tara Greaver,&nbsp;S. Douglas Kaylor,&nbsp;R. Byron Rice,&nbsp;Kate A. Schofield,&nbsp;Andrew Shapiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/csp2.13278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Applying scientific evidence to conservation, environmental management, and policy-making improves outcomes. When synthesizing existing evidence, substantial resources are required to access and read scientific publications and extract and analyze decision-relevant information. To improve this process, we developed a free, publicly available, web-based evidence entry form tailored to extract information about cause-effect relationships from ecological publications. The form enables storage, retrieval, reuse, and visualization of qualitative and quantitative ecological and environmental evidence extracted from publications. Evidence can be analyzed for a wide range of synthesis purposes (e.g., causal assessments, hypothesis testing) and approaches (e.g., rapid reviews, meta-analyses). The database schema underlying the form logically relates information about (a) a publication, (b) its experimental design(s), and (c) reported cause-effect relationships. An ontology of controlled terminology enables consistent extraction and characterization of causes and effects across users, facilitating evidence reuse. Future capabilities include customization of terminology and incorporation of study quality information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conservation Science and Practice\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.13278\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conservation Science and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.13278\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.13278","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将科学证据应用于保护、环境管理和决策可以改善结果。在综合现有证据时,需要大量资源来获取和阅读科学出版物,提取和分析与决策有关的信息。为了改进这一过程,我们开发了一个免费的、公开的、基于网络的证据输入表,用于从生态学出版物中提取有关因果关系的信息。这种形式可以存储、检索、再利用和可视化从出版物中提取的定性和定量的生态和环境证据。证据分析可以用于广泛的综合目的(例如,因果评估,假设检验)和方法(例如,快速回顾,元分析)。表单底层的数据库模式逻辑地将以下信息联系起来:(a)出版物,(b)实验设计,以及(c)报告的因果关系。受控术语本体能够在用户之间一致地提取和描述因果关系,从而促进证据的重用。未来的功能包括术语定制和研究质量信息的整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Web-based ecological evidence entry form enables consistent, accessible extraction and visualization for synthesis applications

Web-based ecological evidence entry form enables consistent, accessible extraction and visualization for synthesis applications

Applying scientific evidence to conservation, environmental management, and policy-making improves outcomes. When synthesizing existing evidence, substantial resources are required to access and read scientific publications and extract and analyze decision-relevant information. To improve this process, we developed a free, publicly available, web-based evidence entry form tailored to extract information about cause-effect relationships from ecological publications. The form enables storage, retrieval, reuse, and visualization of qualitative and quantitative ecological and environmental evidence extracted from publications. Evidence can be analyzed for a wide range of synthesis purposes (e.g., causal assessments, hypothesis testing) and approaches (e.g., rapid reviews, meta-analyses). The database schema underlying the form logically relates information about (a) a publication, (b) its experimental design(s), and (c) reported cause-effect relationships. An ontology of controlled terminology enables consistent extraction and characterization of causes and effects across users, facilitating evidence reuse. Future capabilities include customization of terminology and incorporation of study quality information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Conservation Science and Practice
Conservation Science and Practice BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
240
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信