一氧化碳和二甲醚对247.15 K至临界条件下CO2流气泡点的影响

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q3 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Franklin Okoro, Antonin Chapoy*, Pezhman Ahmadi and Rod Burgass, 
{"title":"一氧化碳和二甲醚对247.15 K至临界条件下CO2流气泡点的影响","authors":"Franklin Okoro,&nbsp;Antonin Chapoy*,&nbsp;Pezhman Ahmadi and Rod Burgass,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jced.4c0060610.1021/acs.jced.4c00606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The quality of CO<sub>2</sub> streams in carbon capture, utilization, and storage is critical, as even small amounts of impurities can significantly affect phase behavior and operational integrity. This study investigated how carbon monoxide (CO) and dimethyl ether (DME), at concentrations of 0.5–5%, impact the bubble points of CO<sub>2</sub> streams compared to pure CO<sub>2</sub> at equal temperatures. Experiments were conducted from 247.15 K to near-critical conditions using constant composition expansion methods. The measurement uncertainties were 0.14 K and 0.03 MPa for the temperatures and pressures, respectively, and the composition uncertainties were 0.0009 and 0.0011 mol/mol for CO<sub>2</sub>–CO and CO<sub>2</sub>–DME systems, respectively. Results showed that CO had a greater effect on the bubble points of CO<sub>2</sub> than DME, attributed to CO’s lower molecular weight. In contrast, DME caused a negative deviation from pure CO<sub>2</sub> vapor pressures due to its heavier molecular weight. Model validations using the Peng–Robinson and Multi-Fluid Helmholtz Energy Approximation equations of state revealed that both provided accurate predictions, with MFHEA outperforming PR, achieving deviations below 2.5%. These findings indicate that noncondensable gases like CO increase the risk of two-phase flow during CO<sub>2</sub> transport, particularly at low temperatures, emphasizing the need for careful impurity management in CCUS systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":42,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data","volume":"70 2","pages":"1004–1012 1004–1012"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.jced.4c00606","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Carbon Monoxide and Dimethyl Ether on the Bubble Points of CO2 Streams from 247.15 K to Critical Conditions\",\"authors\":\"Franklin Okoro,&nbsp;Antonin Chapoy*,&nbsp;Pezhman Ahmadi and Rod Burgass,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jced.4c0060610.1021/acs.jced.4c00606\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >The quality of CO<sub>2</sub> streams in carbon capture, utilization, and storage is critical, as even small amounts of impurities can significantly affect phase behavior and operational integrity. This study investigated how carbon monoxide (CO) and dimethyl ether (DME), at concentrations of 0.5–5%, impact the bubble points of CO<sub>2</sub> streams compared to pure CO<sub>2</sub> at equal temperatures. Experiments were conducted from 247.15 K to near-critical conditions using constant composition expansion methods. The measurement uncertainties were 0.14 K and 0.03 MPa for the temperatures and pressures, respectively, and the composition uncertainties were 0.0009 and 0.0011 mol/mol for CO<sub>2</sub>–CO and CO<sub>2</sub>–DME systems, respectively. Results showed that CO had a greater effect on the bubble points of CO<sub>2</sub> than DME, attributed to CO’s lower molecular weight. In contrast, DME caused a negative deviation from pure CO<sub>2</sub> vapor pressures due to its heavier molecular weight. Model validations using the Peng–Robinson and Multi-Fluid Helmholtz Energy Approximation equations of state revealed that both provided accurate predictions, with MFHEA outperforming PR, achieving deviations below 2.5%. These findings indicate that noncondensable gases like CO increase the risk of two-phase flow during CO<sub>2</sub> transport, particularly at low temperatures, emphasizing the need for careful impurity management in CCUS systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data\",\"volume\":\"70 2\",\"pages\":\"1004–1012 1004–1012\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.jced.4c00606\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jced.4c00606\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jced.4c00606","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在碳捕获、利用和储存过程中,二氧化碳流的质量至关重要,因为即使是少量的杂质也会显著影响相行为和操作完整性。本研究考察了0.5-5%浓度的一氧化碳(CO)和二甲醚(DME)在相同温度下对二氧化碳流气泡点的影响。在247.15 K至近临界条件下,采用恒成分膨胀法进行了实验。温度和压力的测量不确定度分别为0.14 K和0.03 MPa, CO2-CO和CO2-DME体系的组成不确定度分别为0.0009和0.0011 mol/mol。结果表明,由于CO的分子量较低,CO对CO2气泡点的影响大于二甲醚。相比之下,二甲醚由于其较重的分子量而导致了与纯二氧化碳蒸气压的负偏差。使用Peng-Robinson和多流体亥姆霍兹能量近似状态方程进行的模型验证表明,两者都提供了准确的预测,其中MFHEA优于PR,偏差低于2.5%。这些发现表明,像CO这样的不可冷凝气体会增加二氧化碳输送过程中两相流的风险,特别是在低温下,这强调了CCUS系统中需要仔细管理杂质的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Carbon Monoxide and Dimethyl Ether on the Bubble Points of CO2 Streams from 247.15 K to Critical Conditions

The quality of CO2 streams in carbon capture, utilization, and storage is critical, as even small amounts of impurities can significantly affect phase behavior and operational integrity. This study investigated how carbon monoxide (CO) and dimethyl ether (DME), at concentrations of 0.5–5%, impact the bubble points of CO2 streams compared to pure CO2 at equal temperatures. Experiments were conducted from 247.15 K to near-critical conditions using constant composition expansion methods. The measurement uncertainties were 0.14 K and 0.03 MPa for the temperatures and pressures, respectively, and the composition uncertainties were 0.0009 and 0.0011 mol/mol for CO2–CO and CO2–DME systems, respectively. Results showed that CO had a greater effect on the bubble points of CO2 than DME, attributed to CO’s lower molecular weight. In contrast, DME caused a negative deviation from pure CO2 vapor pressures due to its heavier molecular weight. Model validations using the Peng–Robinson and Multi-Fluid Helmholtz Energy Approximation equations of state revealed that both provided accurate predictions, with MFHEA outperforming PR, achieving deviations below 2.5%. These findings indicate that noncondensable gases like CO increase the risk of two-phase flow during CO2 transport, particularly at low temperatures, emphasizing the need for careful impurity management in CCUS systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data
Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
19.20%
发文量
324
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data is a monthly journal devoted to the publication of data obtained from both experiment and computation, which are viewed as complementary. It is the only American Chemical Society journal primarily concerned with articles containing data on the phase behavior and the physical, thermodynamic, and transport properties of well-defined materials, including complex mixtures of known compositions. While environmental and biological samples are of interest, their compositions must be known and reproducible. As a result, adsorption on natural product materials does not generally fit within the scope of Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信