Hanna-Mari Lahtinen , Kirsi Honkalampi , Tegan Insoll , Juha Nurmi , Ethel Quayle , Anna Katariina Ovaska , Nina Vaaranen-Valkonen
{"title":"调查儿童性虐待材料使用者之间的差异:来自指控和未指控个人的匿名自我报告","authors":"Hanna-Mari Lahtinen , Kirsi Honkalampi , Tegan Insoll , Juha Nurmi , Ethel Quayle , Anna Katariina Ovaska , Nina Vaaranen-Valkonen","doi":"10.1016/j.chiabu.2025.107299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The dark web has become a more prevalent platform for the distribution of child sexual abuse material (CSAM). Most CSAM users remain undetected by law enforcement, and little is known about the population not convicted.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of the study was to contribute to the research on CSAM users by investigating the differences between CSAM users who self-report having been charged for sexual offenses against a child or an adult and those who self-report not having been charged of such offenses.</div></div><div><h3>Participants and setting</h3><div>We analyzed anonymous survey data from 2384 respondents who sought CSAM on the dark web. Most of the respondents were young males (18–34-year-olds) searching for material depicting girls. The sample was divided into three groups: 1) those who admitted to having been charged for sexual offenses against children (CS offenders, <em>n</em> = 474); 2) those who admitted to having been charged for sexual offenses against adults (AS offenders, <em>n</em> = 620); and 3) those who admitted to no charges (NC group, <em>n</em> = 1290).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used multinomial logistic regression analysis to analyze differences in self-reported behavior and motivation to access CSAM between the three groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Those who had a previous history of violent offenses, had groomed children online, had physical contact with children, and searched for material depicting infants and toddlers were significantly more likely to belong to the CS or AS offenders group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We found significant differences between the groups in their individual, motivational, and behavioral characteristics that have important implications for investigating sexual crimes and assessing and treating sexual offenders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51343,"journal":{"name":"Child Abuse & Neglect","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 107299"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the disparities among child sexual abuse material users: Anonymous self-reports from both charged and uncharged individuals\",\"authors\":\"Hanna-Mari Lahtinen , Kirsi Honkalampi , Tegan Insoll , Juha Nurmi , Ethel Quayle , Anna Katariina Ovaska , Nina Vaaranen-Valkonen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chiabu.2025.107299\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The dark web has become a more prevalent platform for the distribution of child sexual abuse material (CSAM). Most CSAM users remain undetected by law enforcement, and little is known about the population not convicted.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of the study was to contribute to the research on CSAM users by investigating the differences between CSAM users who self-report having been charged for sexual offenses against a child or an adult and those who self-report not having been charged of such offenses.</div></div><div><h3>Participants and setting</h3><div>We analyzed anonymous survey data from 2384 respondents who sought CSAM on the dark web. Most of the respondents were young males (18–34-year-olds) searching for material depicting girls. The sample was divided into three groups: 1) those who admitted to having been charged for sexual offenses against children (CS offenders, <em>n</em> = 474); 2) those who admitted to having been charged for sexual offenses against adults (AS offenders, <em>n</em> = 620); and 3) those who admitted to no charges (NC group, <em>n</em> = 1290).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used multinomial logistic regression analysis to analyze differences in self-reported behavior and motivation to access CSAM between the three groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Those who had a previous history of violent offenses, had groomed children online, had physical contact with children, and searched for material depicting infants and toddlers were significantly more likely to belong to the CS or AS offenders group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We found significant differences between the groups in their individual, motivational, and behavioral characteristics that have important implications for investigating sexual crimes and assessing and treating sexual offenders.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child Abuse & Neglect\",\"volume\":\"161 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107299\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child Abuse & Neglect\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213425000547\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Abuse & Neglect","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213425000547","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Investigating the disparities among child sexual abuse material users: Anonymous self-reports from both charged and uncharged individuals
Background
The dark web has become a more prevalent platform for the distribution of child sexual abuse material (CSAM). Most CSAM users remain undetected by law enforcement, and little is known about the population not convicted.
Objective
The aim of the study was to contribute to the research on CSAM users by investigating the differences between CSAM users who self-report having been charged for sexual offenses against a child or an adult and those who self-report not having been charged of such offenses.
Participants and setting
We analyzed anonymous survey data from 2384 respondents who sought CSAM on the dark web. Most of the respondents were young males (18–34-year-olds) searching for material depicting girls. The sample was divided into three groups: 1) those who admitted to having been charged for sexual offenses against children (CS offenders, n = 474); 2) those who admitted to having been charged for sexual offenses against adults (AS offenders, n = 620); and 3) those who admitted to no charges (NC group, n = 1290).
Methods
We used multinomial logistic regression analysis to analyze differences in self-reported behavior and motivation to access CSAM between the three groups.
Results
Those who had a previous history of violent offenses, had groomed children online, had physical contact with children, and searched for material depicting infants and toddlers were significantly more likely to belong to the CS or AS offenders group.
Conclusions
We found significant differences between the groups in their individual, motivational, and behavioral characteristics that have important implications for investigating sexual crimes and assessing and treating sexual offenders.
期刊介绍:
Official Publication of the International Society for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect The International Journal, provides an international, multidisciplinary forum on all aspects of child abuse and neglect, with special emphasis on prevention and treatment; the scope extends further to all those aspects of life which either favor or hinder child development. While contributions will primarily be from the fields of psychology, psychiatry, social work, medicine, nursing, law enforcement, legislature, education, and anthropology, the Journal encourages the concerned lay individual and child-oriented advocate organizations to contribute.