森林和草原土壤温室气体通量对土地管理的响应:一个全球元分析

IF 8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Huanhuan Liu , Yuqi Miao , Yu Chen , Yifan Shen , Yongfa You , Zhuonan Wang , Chengcheng Gang
{"title":"森林和草原土壤温室气体通量对土地管理的响应:一个全球元分析","authors":"Huanhuan Liu ,&nbsp;Yuqi Miao ,&nbsp;Yu Chen ,&nbsp;Yifan Shen ,&nbsp;Yongfa You ,&nbsp;Zhuonan Wang ,&nbsp;Chengcheng Gang","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Land management practices significantly influence soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Despite individual measurements of the impacts of forest and grassland ecosystem management practices (FGEM) on GHG emissions, a comprehensive global-scale synthesis and comparison remain absent. In this study, a global meta-analysis was conducted to analyze the responses of three key soil GHGs, including carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), and nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O), to various FGEM, including forest burning (FB) and thinning (FT), grassland grazing (GG), fencing (GF), and mowing (GM) based on 1643 observations from 317 individual studies. Moderator factors and the underlying mechanisms driving these responses were also explored. Results revealed that in managed forests, FB significantly reduced soil CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions, while FT decreased soil CH<sub>4</sub> uptake capacity without affecting CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. In managed grasslands, GG reduced soil CO<sub>2</sub> emission, while GF increased it; both had neutral impacts on soil CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes. GM did not affect GHG fluxes. Overall, forest management decreased soil CO<sub>2</sub> emission and CH<sub>4</sub> uptake capacity, whereas grassland management had a neutral effect on soil GHG fluxes. Temporal analysis revealed diminishing effects of FGEM on CO<sub>2</sub> emissions over the long term. Soil CH<sub>4</sub> uptake exhibited divergent responses over time, and soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions remained relatively constant. Compared to managed grassland, soil GHG fluxes in managed forests were more sensitive to aridity conditions, with forest management generally restraining soil CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions and CH<sub>4</sub> uptake in humid regions. Meta-regression analysis highlighted carbon content, soil temperature, and soil moisture as primary drives of changes in soil CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes, while soil N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes were more susceptible to soil organic carbon and microbial biomass nitrogen. The dependence of soil GHG fluxes on climate zones and management duration should be integrated into Earth system models for more accurate predictions of the impact of human interference.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"967 ","pages":"Article 178773"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Responses of soil greenhouse gas fluxes to land management in forests and grasslands: A global meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Huanhuan Liu ,&nbsp;Yuqi Miao ,&nbsp;Yu Chen ,&nbsp;Yifan Shen ,&nbsp;Yongfa You ,&nbsp;Zhuonan Wang ,&nbsp;Chengcheng Gang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Land management practices significantly influence soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Despite individual measurements of the impacts of forest and grassland ecosystem management practices (FGEM) on GHG emissions, a comprehensive global-scale synthesis and comparison remain absent. In this study, a global meta-analysis was conducted to analyze the responses of three key soil GHGs, including carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), and nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O), to various FGEM, including forest burning (FB) and thinning (FT), grassland grazing (GG), fencing (GF), and mowing (GM) based on 1643 observations from 317 individual studies. Moderator factors and the underlying mechanisms driving these responses were also explored. Results revealed that in managed forests, FB significantly reduced soil CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions, while FT decreased soil CH<sub>4</sub> uptake capacity without affecting CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. In managed grasslands, GG reduced soil CO<sub>2</sub> emission, while GF increased it; both had neutral impacts on soil CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes. GM did not affect GHG fluxes. Overall, forest management decreased soil CO<sub>2</sub> emission and CH<sub>4</sub> uptake capacity, whereas grassland management had a neutral effect on soil GHG fluxes. Temporal analysis revealed diminishing effects of FGEM on CO<sub>2</sub> emissions over the long term. Soil CH<sub>4</sub> uptake exhibited divergent responses over time, and soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions remained relatively constant. Compared to managed grassland, soil GHG fluxes in managed forests were more sensitive to aridity conditions, with forest management generally restraining soil CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions and CH<sub>4</sub> uptake in humid regions. Meta-regression analysis highlighted carbon content, soil temperature, and soil moisture as primary drives of changes in soil CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes, while soil N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes were more susceptible to soil organic carbon and microbial biomass nitrogen. The dependence of soil GHG fluxes on climate zones and management duration should be integrated into Earth system models for more accurate predictions of the impact of human interference.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science of the Total Environment\",\"volume\":\"967 \",\"pages\":\"Article 178773\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science of the Total Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969725004085\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969725004085","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土地管理实践显著影响土壤温室气体(GHG)排放。尽管对森林和草地生态系统管理措施(FGEM)对温室气体排放的影响进行了个别测量,但目前仍缺乏全面的全球尺度综合和比较。本研究基于317个独立研究的1643个观测数据,对二氧化碳(CO2)、甲烷(CH4)和氧化亚氮(N2O)三种关键土壤温室气体(CO2)对森林燃烧(FB)和疏林(FT)、草地放牧(GG)、围栏(GF)和刈割(GM)等不同FGEM的响应进行了全球meta分析。本文还探讨了调节因素和驱动这些反应的潜在机制。结果表明,在经销林中,FB显著降低了土壤CO2和N2O的排放,而FT降低了土壤CH4的吸收能力,但不影响CO2和N2O的排放。在管理草原,GG降低了土壤CO2排放,GF增加了土壤CO2排放;两者对土壤CH4和N2O通量的影响均为中性。转基因不影响温室气体通量。总体而言,森林管理降低了土壤CO2排放和CH4吸收能力,而草地管理对土壤温室气体通量的影响为中性。时间分析显示,从长期来看,FGEM对CO2排放的影响逐渐减弱。土壤CH4吸收随时间的变化呈现出不同的响应,土壤N2O排放保持相对稳定。与管理过的草地相比,管理过的森林土壤温室气体通量对干旱条件更为敏感,森林管理通常会抑制潮湿地区土壤CO2和N2O排放以及CH4吸收。meta回归分析显示,碳含量、土壤温度和土壤湿度是土壤CO2和CH4通量变化的主要驱动因素,而土壤N2O通量更容易受到土壤有机碳和微生物量氮的影响。土壤温室气体通量对气候带和管理持续时间的依赖性应纳入地球系统模型,以便更准确地预测人类干扰的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Responses of soil greenhouse gas fluxes to land management in forests and grasslands: A global meta-analysis

Responses of soil greenhouse gas fluxes to land management in forests and grasslands: A global meta-analysis
Land management practices significantly influence soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Despite individual measurements of the impacts of forest and grassland ecosystem management practices (FGEM) on GHG emissions, a comprehensive global-scale synthesis and comparison remain absent. In this study, a global meta-analysis was conducted to analyze the responses of three key soil GHGs, including carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O), to various FGEM, including forest burning (FB) and thinning (FT), grassland grazing (GG), fencing (GF), and mowing (GM) based on 1643 observations from 317 individual studies. Moderator factors and the underlying mechanisms driving these responses were also explored. Results revealed that in managed forests, FB significantly reduced soil CO2 and N2O emissions, while FT decreased soil CH4 uptake capacity without affecting CO2 and N2O emissions. In managed grasslands, GG reduced soil CO2 emission, while GF increased it; both had neutral impacts on soil CH4 and N2O fluxes. GM did not affect GHG fluxes. Overall, forest management decreased soil CO2 emission and CH4 uptake capacity, whereas grassland management had a neutral effect on soil GHG fluxes. Temporal analysis revealed diminishing effects of FGEM on CO2 emissions over the long term. Soil CH4 uptake exhibited divergent responses over time, and soil N2O emissions remained relatively constant. Compared to managed grassland, soil GHG fluxes in managed forests were more sensitive to aridity conditions, with forest management generally restraining soil CO2 and N2O emissions and CH4 uptake in humid regions. Meta-regression analysis highlighted carbon content, soil temperature, and soil moisture as primary drives of changes in soil CO2 and CH4 fluxes, while soil N2O fluxes were more susceptible to soil organic carbon and microbial biomass nitrogen. The dependence of soil GHG fluxes on climate zones and management duration should be integrated into Earth system models for more accurate predictions of the impact of human interference.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信