利用硫酸焙烧和苏打浸出法生产矿石型碳酸锂的生命周期评估:硫酸钠电渗析的影响

IF 4.8 2区 材料科学 Q1 METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING
Heikki Lappalainen , Heini Elomaa , Jari Aromaa , Mari Lundström
{"title":"利用硫酸焙烧和苏打浸出法生产矿石型碳酸锂的生命周期评估:硫酸钠电渗析的影响","authors":"Heikki Lappalainen ,&nbsp;Heini Elomaa ,&nbsp;Jari Aromaa ,&nbsp;Mari Lundström","doi":"10.1016/j.hydromet.2025.106450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The environmental footprints of batteries and battery chemicals play an important role in the transition towards decarbonized transportation. Lithium carbonate is a conventional lithium salt that is used in manufacturing lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles and other applications. It is mainly produced either from lithium rich brines or from spodumene ores, the latter being generally more energy intensive due to minerals processing steps and high temperature operations. Finding the process routes for lithium carbonate with the lowest possible environmental impacts is crucial for minimizing the whole battery life cycle environmental footprints. In this work, a simulation-based life cycle assessment was conducted for producing lithium carbonate from spodumene concentrate using two different hydrometallurgical process routes: Sulfuric acid roasting and soda leaching. In the sulfuric acid roasting process, the treatment of generated sodium sulfate was also investigated, as sodium sulfate is a common and hard-to-abate waste from many industrial processes. An electrodialysis method described in the literature was used to convert sodium sulfate into sodium hydroxide and sulfuric acid, which were re-used in the process, or allocated as marketable products in the life cycle assessment. The life cycle impact assessment shows that the soda leaching process exhibits reduced environmental impacts in all chosen impact categories, often reaching a reduction of 40–50 % compared to the sulfuric acid roasting process. The largest sources of environmental impacts in both processes were energy generation and sodium carbonate production. The sodium sulfate treatment scenario in the sulfuric acid roasting process showed lowered environmental impacts when compared to the baseline scenario, except in water use, which was significantly higher. If the level of water use can be curtailed through process optimization and reaction efficiency, electrodialysis could be seen as an environmentally feasible method for sodium sulfate waste treatment in existing sulfuric acid roasting processes. Nevertheless, it can be suggested that in lithium refining from spodumene ore a preferred processing strategy would be to avoid sulfate generating unit processes altogether if technologically possible.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13193,"journal":{"name":"Hydrometallurgy","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 106450"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Life cycle assessment of ore-based lithium carbonate production using sulfuric acid roasting and soda leaching: Impact of sodium sulfate electrodialysis\",\"authors\":\"Heikki Lappalainen ,&nbsp;Heini Elomaa ,&nbsp;Jari Aromaa ,&nbsp;Mari Lundström\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hydromet.2025.106450\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The environmental footprints of batteries and battery chemicals play an important role in the transition towards decarbonized transportation. Lithium carbonate is a conventional lithium salt that is used in manufacturing lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles and other applications. It is mainly produced either from lithium rich brines or from spodumene ores, the latter being generally more energy intensive due to minerals processing steps and high temperature operations. Finding the process routes for lithium carbonate with the lowest possible environmental impacts is crucial for minimizing the whole battery life cycle environmental footprints. In this work, a simulation-based life cycle assessment was conducted for producing lithium carbonate from spodumene concentrate using two different hydrometallurgical process routes: Sulfuric acid roasting and soda leaching. In the sulfuric acid roasting process, the treatment of generated sodium sulfate was also investigated, as sodium sulfate is a common and hard-to-abate waste from many industrial processes. An electrodialysis method described in the literature was used to convert sodium sulfate into sodium hydroxide and sulfuric acid, which were re-used in the process, or allocated as marketable products in the life cycle assessment. The life cycle impact assessment shows that the soda leaching process exhibits reduced environmental impacts in all chosen impact categories, often reaching a reduction of 40–50 % compared to the sulfuric acid roasting process. The largest sources of environmental impacts in both processes were energy generation and sodium carbonate production. The sodium sulfate treatment scenario in the sulfuric acid roasting process showed lowered environmental impacts when compared to the baseline scenario, except in water use, which was significantly higher. If the level of water use can be curtailed through process optimization and reaction efficiency, electrodialysis could be seen as an environmentally feasible method for sodium sulfate waste treatment in existing sulfuric acid roasting processes. Nevertheless, it can be suggested that in lithium refining from spodumene ore a preferred processing strategy would be to avoid sulfate generating unit processes altogether if technologically possible.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hydrometallurgy\",\"volume\":\"233 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106450\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hydrometallurgy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304386X25000155\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrometallurgy","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304386X25000155","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Life cycle assessment of ore-based lithium carbonate production using sulfuric acid roasting and soda leaching: Impact of sodium sulfate electrodialysis
The environmental footprints of batteries and battery chemicals play an important role in the transition towards decarbonized transportation. Lithium carbonate is a conventional lithium salt that is used in manufacturing lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles and other applications. It is mainly produced either from lithium rich brines or from spodumene ores, the latter being generally more energy intensive due to minerals processing steps and high temperature operations. Finding the process routes for lithium carbonate with the lowest possible environmental impacts is crucial for minimizing the whole battery life cycle environmental footprints. In this work, a simulation-based life cycle assessment was conducted for producing lithium carbonate from spodumene concentrate using two different hydrometallurgical process routes: Sulfuric acid roasting and soda leaching. In the sulfuric acid roasting process, the treatment of generated sodium sulfate was also investigated, as sodium sulfate is a common and hard-to-abate waste from many industrial processes. An electrodialysis method described in the literature was used to convert sodium sulfate into sodium hydroxide and sulfuric acid, which were re-used in the process, or allocated as marketable products in the life cycle assessment. The life cycle impact assessment shows that the soda leaching process exhibits reduced environmental impacts in all chosen impact categories, often reaching a reduction of 40–50 % compared to the sulfuric acid roasting process. The largest sources of environmental impacts in both processes were energy generation and sodium carbonate production. The sodium sulfate treatment scenario in the sulfuric acid roasting process showed lowered environmental impacts when compared to the baseline scenario, except in water use, which was significantly higher. If the level of water use can be curtailed through process optimization and reaction efficiency, electrodialysis could be seen as an environmentally feasible method for sodium sulfate waste treatment in existing sulfuric acid roasting processes. Nevertheless, it can be suggested that in lithium refining from spodumene ore a preferred processing strategy would be to avoid sulfate generating unit processes altogether if technologically possible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hydrometallurgy
Hydrometallurgy 工程技术-冶金工程
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
6.40%
发文量
144
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: Hydrometallurgy aims to compile studies on novel processes, process design, chemistry, modelling, control, economics and interfaces between unit operations, and to provide a forum for discussions on case histories and operational difficulties. Topics covered include: leaching of metal values by chemical reagents or bacterial action at ambient or elevated pressures and temperatures; separation of solids from leach liquors; removal of impurities and recovery of metal values by precipitation, ion exchange, solvent extraction, gaseous reduction, cementation, electro-winning and electro-refining; pre-treatment of ores by roasting or chemical treatments such as halogenation or reduction; recycling of reagents and treatment of effluents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信