美国基于微藻的可再生柴油和可持续航空燃料的地理解决技术经济和生命周期评估比较

IF 11.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Jonah M. Greene, David Quiroz, Braden J. Limb, Jason C. Quinn
{"title":"美国基于微藻的可再生柴油和可持续航空燃料的地理解决技术经济和生命周期评估比较","authors":"Jonah M. Greene, David Quiroz, Braden J. Limb, Jason C. Quinn","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.4c06742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study integrates high-resolution thermal and biological modeling with techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment to evaluate and compare two different microalgae biorefinery configurations targeting renewable diesel (RD) and sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) production in the United States at the county level. A dynamic engineering process model captures mass and energy balances for biomass growth, storage, dewatering, and conversion with hourly resolution. The modeled configurations enable large-scale biofuel production by supporting facilities in remote locations and cultivation on marginal lands. The two pathways under examination share identical biomass production and harvesting assumptions but differ in their conversion processes. The first pathway evaluates hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) to produce RD, while the second pathway explores the hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids (HEFA) process to produce SAF. Results indicate that the minimum fuel selling price (MFSP) for HTL could decrease from 3.72–$7.26 to 1.48–$4.10 per liter of gasoline equivalent (LGE<sup>–1</sup>), and for HEFA from 5.79–$10.93 to 1.73–$4.48 LGE<sup>–1</sup> under future scenarios with increased lipid content and reduced CO<sub>2</sub> delivery costs. Optimization analyses reveal pathways to achieve a MFSP of $0.75 LGE<sup>–1</sup> and 70% greenhouse gas emissions reductions compared to petroleum fuels for both pathways. The study also examines water footprint, land-use change emissions, and additional environmental impacts. Discussion focuses on outlining strategic research and development investments to reduce production costs and environmental burdens from microalgae biofuels.","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geographically-Resolved Techno-Economic and Life Cycle Assessment Comparing Microalgae-Based Renewable Diesel and Sustainable Aviation Fuel in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Jonah M. Greene, David Quiroz, Braden J. Limb, Jason C. Quinn\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.est.4c06742\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study integrates high-resolution thermal and biological modeling with techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment to evaluate and compare two different microalgae biorefinery configurations targeting renewable diesel (RD) and sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) production in the United States at the county level. A dynamic engineering process model captures mass and energy balances for biomass growth, storage, dewatering, and conversion with hourly resolution. The modeled configurations enable large-scale biofuel production by supporting facilities in remote locations and cultivation on marginal lands. The two pathways under examination share identical biomass production and harvesting assumptions but differ in their conversion processes. The first pathway evaluates hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) to produce RD, while the second pathway explores the hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids (HEFA) process to produce SAF. Results indicate that the minimum fuel selling price (MFSP) for HTL could decrease from 3.72–$7.26 to 1.48–$4.10 per liter of gasoline equivalent (LGE<sup>–1</sup>), and for HEFA from 5.79–$10.93 to 1.73–$4.48 LGE<sup>–1</sup> under future scenarios with increased lipid content and reduced CO<sub>2</sub> delivery costs. Optimization analyses reveal pathways to achieve a MFSP of $0.75 LGE<sup>–1</sup> and 70% greenhouse gas emissions reductions compared to petroleum fuels for both pathways. The study also examines water footprint, land-use change emissions, and additional environmental impacts. Discussion focuses on outlining strategic research and development investments to reduce production costs and environmental burdens from microalgae biofuels.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c06742\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c06742","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究将高分辨率热能和生物建模与技术经济分析和生命周期评估相结合,对美国县级可再生柴油(RD)和可持续航空燃料(SAF)生产的两种不同微藻生物精炼厂配置进行评估和比较。动态工程过程模型以每小时为单位,捕捉生物质生长、储存、脱水和转化过程中的质量和能量平衡。模型配置通过支持偏远地区的设施和贫瘠土地上的种植,实现了大规模生物燃料生产。所研究的两种途径具有相同的生物质生产和收获假设,但在转化过程中有所不同。第一种途径评估了生产 RD 的热液液化(HTL)工艺,而第二种途径则探索了生产 SAF 的加氢处理酯和脂肪酸(HEFA)工艺。结果表明,在未来脂质含量增加和二氧化碳输送成本降低的情况下,HTL 的最低燃料销售价格(MFSP)可从每升汽油当量 3.72 美元至 7.26 美元降至 1.48 美元至 4.10 美元,HEFA 的最低燃料销售价格可从每升汽油当量 5.79 美元至 10.93 美元降至 1.73 美元至 4.48 美元。优化分析揭示了实现 0.75 LGE-1 美元 MFSP 的途径,以及这两种途径与石油燃料相比减少 70% 温室气体排放的途径。研究还考察了水足迹、土地利用变化排放和其他环境影响。讨论的重点是概述战略性研发投资,以降低微藻生物燃料的生产成本和环境负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Geographically-Resolved Techno-Economic and Life Cycle Assessment Comparing Microalgae-Based Renewable Diesel and Sustainable Aviation Fuel in the United States

Geographically-Resolved Techno-Economic and Life Cycle Assessment Comparing Microalgae-Based Renewable Diesel and Sustainable Aviation Fuel in the United States
This study integrates high-resolution thermal and biological modeling with techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment to evaluate and compare two different microalgae biorefinery configurations targeting renewable diesel (RD) and sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) production in the United States at the county level. A dynamic engineering process model captures mass and energy balances for biomass growth, storage, dewatering, and conversion with hourly resolution. The modeled configurations enable large-scale biofuel production by supporting facilities in remote locations and cultivation on marginal lands. The two pathways under examination share identical biomass production and harvesting assumptions but differ in their conversion processes. The first pathway evaluates hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) to produce RD, while the second pathway explores the hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids (HEFA) process to produce SAF. Results indicate that the minimum fuel selling price (MFSP) for HTL could decrease from 3.72–$7.26 to 1.48–$4.10 per liter of gasoline equivalent (LGE–1), and for HEFA from 5.79–$10.93 to 1.73–$4.48 LGE–1 under future scenarios with increased lipid content and reduced CO2 delivery costs. Optimization analyses reveal pathways to achieve a MFSP of $0.75 LGE–1 and 70% greenhouse gas emissions reductions compared to petroleum fuels for both pathways. The study also examines water footprint, land-use change emissions, and additional environmental impacts. Discussion focuses on outlining strategic research and development investments to reduce production costs and environmental burdens from microalgae biofuels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
环境科学与技术
环境科学与技术 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
17.50
自引率
9.60%
发文量
12359
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences. Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信